Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 132 - GENERAL PROVISIONS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 132.185 (2026)

“Interested person” defined

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 132.185  “Interested person” defined.  “Interested person” means a person whose right or interest under an estate or trust may be materially affected by a decision of a fiduciary or a decision of the court. The fiduciary or court shall determine who is an interested person according to the particular purposes of, and matter involved in, a proceeding.

      (Added to NRS by 1999, 2252; A 2007, 2395; 2011, 1435; 2015, 3526)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2021–2025 · leading case: In Re: Est. Of Harris (Nev. 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re: Est. Of Harris (Nev. 2022). · cites it 6× “” NRS 132.185; see also NRS 132.390. Supreme Court OF NEvaDA (0) 1947 RRO Here, the district court determined that appellant was not an interested person in the underlying matter under NRS 132.”
New York Times Co. v. Dist. Ct. (doe 1 Trust) (civil), 141 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 71 (Nev. 2025). “041(3) provides that none of the foregoing statutory provisions "shall be construed to abridge the power of any court of competent jurisdiction to order the production of unredacted and complete copies of' previously redacted or sealed documents "to an interested person, as…”
In Re: Est. Of Starkey (Nev. 2021). · cites it 2× “" NRS 132.185; see also NRS 132.390. Here, appellant claims no right under the estate and the district court appears to have determined that he is not an interested person for the purposes of contesting the confirmation of sale.”
New York Times Co. v. Dist. Ct. (doe 1 Trust) (civil), 141 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 71 (Nev. 2025). “041(3) provides that none of the foregoing statutory provisions “shall be construed to abridge the power of any court of competent jurisdiction to order the production of unredacted and complete copies of” previously redacted or sealed documents “to an interested person, as…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.