Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 143 - POWERS AND DUTIES OF PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 143.110 (2026)

Procedure when conversion alleged: Citation; examination; allowance of necessary expenses

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 143.110  Procedure when conversion alleged: Citation; examination; allowance of necessary expenses.

      1.  If a personal representative or other interested person alleges in a petition to the court that any person has, or is suspected to have, concealed, converted, conveyed away or otherwise disposed of any money, goods, chattels or effects of the decedent, or that the person has possession or knowledge of any deeds, conveyances, bonds, contracts or other writings which contain evidence of, or tend to disclose the right, title or interest of the decedent in or to any real or personal property, or any claim or demand, or any last will of the decedent, the court may cause that person to be cited to appear before the court to answer, upon oath, upon the matter of the petition.

      2.  If the person is not in the county where letters have been granted, the person may be cited and examined either before the court of the county where the person may be found, or before the court issuing the citation. If the person appears, and is found innocent, his or her necessary expenses must be allowed out of the estate.

      [108:107:1941; 1931 NCL § 9882.108]—(NRS A 1999, 2293)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1976–1976 · leading case: Peters v. Peters, 557 P.2d 713 (Nev. 1976).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Peters v. Peters, 557 P.2d 713 (Nev. 1976). “On April 2, 1974, respondent filed in the estate proceeding a “Petition for Declaratory Relief to Determine Status of Certain Real and Personal Property,” seeking to have the property described therein declared to be community property and subject to administration in the Estate…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.