Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 17 - JUDGMENTS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 17.810 (2026)

Uniformity of interpretation

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 17.810  Uniformity of interpretation.  In applying and construing the Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act, consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it.

      (Added to NRS by 2007, 149)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2020–2025 · leading case: Lathigee Vs. British Columbia Sec. Comm'n, 477 P.3d 352 (Nev. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lathigee Vs. British Columbia Sec. Comm'n, 477 P.3d 352 (Nev. 2020). “" NRS 17.810. To this end, we accept as persua.”
LCW Investments, LLC v. Beltway Inv. Grp., Inc., No. 2:24-cv-01428 (D. Nev. June 18, 2025). · cites it 2× “3d at 355 (quoting Nev. Rev. Stat. § 17.810 ). 14 The parties dedicate the majority of their respective briefing to disputing what may be 15 considered by the court when it comes to an action seeking recognition of a foreign judgment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.