Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 176A - PROBATION AND SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 176A.287 (2026)

Ineligibility for program: Exceptions

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 176A.287  Ineligibility for program: Exceptions.

      1.  Except as otherwise provided in subsection 2, a defendant is not eligible for assignment to a program of treatment established pursuant to NRS 176A.280 if:

      (a) The offense committed by the defendant was a category A felony or a sexual offense as defined in NRS 179D.097 that is punishable as a category B felony; or

      (b) The defendant was discharged or released from the Armed Forces of the United States, a reserve component thereof or the National Guard under dishonorable conditions.

      2.  A defendant described in paragraph (b) of subsection 1 may be assigned to a program of treatment established pursuant to NRS 176A.280 if a justice court, municipal court or district court, as applicable, determines that extraordinary circumstances exist which warrant the assignment of the defendant to the program.

      (Added to NRS by 2017, 3019; A 2019, 2445, 4396)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2018–2018 · leading case: State v. Second Jud. Dist. Court of Nev., 432 P.3d 154 (Nev. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Second Jud. Dist. Court of Nev., 432 P.3d 154 (Nev. 2018). · cites it 4× “NRS 176A.287(1). For example, a defendant who "[h]as previously been assigned to such a program" is not eligible for assignment.”
State Vs. Dist. Ct. (hearn (matthew)), 2018 NV 96 (Nev. 2018). · cites it 6× “NRS 176A.287(1). For example, a defendant who "[hi as previously been assigned to such a program" is not eligible for assignment.”
State Vs. Dist. Ct. (hearn (matthew)), 2018 NV 96 (Nev. 2018). · cites it 3× “NRS 176A.287(1). For example, a defendant who "[hi as previously been assigned to such a program" is not eligible for assignment.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 176A.287(1): 3 cases
State v. Second Jud. Dist. Court of Nev., 432 P.3d 154 (Nev. 2018). “NRS 176A.287(1). For example, a defendant who "[h]as previously been assigned to such a program" is not eligible for assignment.”
State Vs. Dist. Ct. (hearn (matthew)), 2018 NV 96 (Nev. 2018). “NRS 176A.287(1). For example, a defendant who "[hi as previously been assigned to such a program" is not eligible for assignment.”
State Vs. Dist. Ct. (hearn (matthew)), 2018 NV 96 (Nev. 2018). “NRS 176A.287(1). For example, a defendant who "[hi as previously been assigned to such a program" is not eligible for assignment.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 176A.287(1)(a): 3 cases
State v. Second Jud. Dist. Court of Nev., 432 P.3d 154 (Nev. 2018). “NRS 176A.287(1). For example, a defendant who "[h]as previously been assigned to such a program" is not eligible for assignment.”
State Vs. Dist. Ct. (hearn (matthew)), 2018 NV 96 (Nev. 2018). “NRS 176A.287(1). For example, a defendant who "[hi as previously been assigned to such a program" is not eligible for assignment.”
State Vs. Dist. Ct. (hearn (matthew)), 2018 NV 96 (Nev. 2018). “NRS 176A.287(1). For example, a defendant who "[hi as previously been assigned to such a program" is not eligible for assignment.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 176A.287(1)(b): 1 case
State v. Second Jud. Dist. Court of Nev., 432 P.3d 154 (Nev. 2018). “NRS 176A.287(1). For example, a defendant who "[h]as previously been assigned to such a program" is not eligible for assignment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.