Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 178 - GENERAL PROVISIONS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 178.4851 (2026)

Imposition of bail or conditions of release; signing and filing of document; arrest for violation of condition

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 178.4851  Imposition of bail or conditions of release; signing and filing of document; arrest for violation of condition.

      1.  Except as otherwise provided in subsection 4, the court shall only impose bail or a condition of release, or both, on a person as it deems to be the least restrictive means necessary to protect the safety of the community or to ensure that the person will appear at all times and places ordered by the court, with regard to the factors set forth in NRS 178.4853 and 178.498. Such conditions of release may include, without limitation:

      (a) Requiring the person to remain in this State or a certain county within this State;

      (b) Prohibiting the person from contacting or attempting to contact a specific person or from causing or attempting to cause another person to contact that person on the person’s behalf;

      (c) Prohibiting the person from entering a certain geographic area;

      (d) Prohibiting the person from possessing a firearm during the pendency of the case; or

      (e) Prohibiting the person from engaging in specific conduct that may be harmful to the person’s own health, safety or welfare, or the health, safety or welfare of another person.

      2.  A prosecuting attorney may request that a court impose bail or a condition of release, or both, on a person. If the request includes the imposition of bail, the prosecuting attorney must prove by clear and convincing evidence that the imposition of bail is necessary to protect the safety of the community or to ensure that the person will appear at all times and places ordered by the court, with regard to the factors set forth in NRS 178.4853 and 178.498.

      3.  If a court imposes bail or any condition of release, or both, other than release on recognizance with no other conditions of release, the court shall make findings of fact for such a determination and state its reasoning on the record, and, if the determination includes the imposition of a condition of release, the findings of fact must include why the condition of release constitutes the least restrictive means necessary to protect the safety of the community or to ensure that the person will appear at the times and places ordered by the court.

      4.  A person arrested for murder of the first degree may be admitted to bail unless the proof is evident or the presumption great by any competent court or magistrate authorized by law to do so in the exercise of discretion, giving due weight to the evidence and to the nature and circumstances of the offense.

      5.  The person must sign a document before the person’s release stating that:

      (a) The person will appear at all times and places as ordered by the court releasing the person and as ordered by any court before which the charge is subsequently heard;

      (b) The person will comply with the other conditions which have been imposed by the court and are stated in the document;

      (c) If the person fails to appear when so ordered and is taken into custody outside of this State, the person waives all rights relating to extradition proceedings; and

      (d) The person understands that any court of competent jurisdiction may revoke the order of release without bail and may order the person into custody or require the person to furnish bail or otherwise ensure the protection of the safety of the community or the person’s appearance, if applicable.

      6.  The document signed pursuant to subsection 5 must be filed with the clerk of the court of competent jurisdiction and becomes effective upon the signature of the person to be released.

      7.  If a person fails to comply with a condition of release imposed pursuant to this section, the court may, after providing the person with reasonable notice and an opportunity for a hearing:

      (a) Deem such conduct a contempt pursuant to NRS 22.010;

      (b) Impose such additional conditions of release as the court deems necessary to protect the safety of the community or to ensure the person will appear at the times and places ordered by the court;

      (c) Increase the amount of bail pursuant to NRS 178.499, if applicable; or

      (d) Revoke bail and remand the person into custody.

      8.  If a person fails to appear as ordered by the court and a jurisdiction incurs any costs in returning a person to the jurisdiction to stand trial, the person failing to appear is responsible for paying those costs as restitution.

      9.  An order issued pursuant to this section that imposes a condition on a person must include a provision ordering a law enforcement officer to arrest the person if the law enforcement officer has probable cause to believe that the person has violated a condition of release.

      10.  Nothing in this section shall be construed to require a court to receive the request of a prosecuting attorney before imposing a condition of release.

      (Added to NRS by 1981, 1584; A 1987, 454; 1997, 3359; 2001, 1226; 2007, 53, 1020; 2021, 3579; 2023, 2505)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2005–2022 · leading case: Johnston v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 2022 NV 67 (Nev. 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Johnston v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 2022 NV 67 (Nev. 2022). · cites it 30× “And we hold that NRS 178.4851 and Valdez-Jimenez require the district court to make findings of fact on the record that each condition of pretrial release is the least restrictive means of ensuring public safety and the defendant's return to court.”
United States v. Raymond Lee Scott, 450 F.3d 863 (9th Cir. 2006). “See Nev.Rev.Stat. § 178.4851(2); see also id.”
United States v. Raymond Lee Scott, 424 F.3d 888 (9th Cir. 2005). “See Nev.Rev.Stat. § 178.4851(2); see also id.”
Valdez-jimenez (jose) Vs. Dist. Ct. (state) c/w 76845, 2020 NV 20 (Nev. 2020). · cites it 4× “6 We agree that this "good cause" requirement to 6NRS 178.4851(1) states: Upon a showing of good cause, a court may release without bail any person entitled to bail if it appears to the court that it can impose conditions on the person that will adequately protect the health,…”
Valdez-jimenez (jose) Vs. Dist. Ct. (state) c/w 76845, 2020 NV 20 (Nev. 2020). · cites it 2× “6 We agree that this "good cause" requirement to 6NRS 178.4851(1) states: Upon a showing of good cause, a court may release without bail any person entitled to bail if it appears to the court that it can impose conditions on the person that will adequately protect the health,…”
United States v. Scott (9th Cir. 2005). “See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 178.4851 (2); see also id.”
United States v. Scott (9th Cir. 2006). “See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 178.4851 (2); see also id.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 178.4851(1) — 3 cases
Johnston v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 2022 NV 67 (Nev. 2022). “And we hold that NRS 178.4851 and Valdez-Jimenez require the district court to make findings of fact on the record that each condition of pretrial release is the least restrictive means of ensuring public safety and the defendant's return to court.”
Valdez-jimenez (jose) Vs. Dist. Ct. (state) c/w 76845, 2020 NV 20 (Nev. 2020). “6 We agree that this "good cause" requirement to 6NRS 178.4851(1) states: Upon a showing of good cause, a court may release without bail any person entitled to bail if it appears to the court that it can impose conditions on the person that will adequately protect the health,…”
Valdez-jimenez (jose) Vs. Dist. Ct. (state) c/w 76845, 2020 NV 20 (Nev. 2020). “6 We agree that this "good cause" requirement to 6NRS 178.4851(1) states: Upon a showing of good cause, a court may release without bail any person entitled to bail if it appears to the court that it can impose conditions on the person that will adequately protect the health,…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 178.4851(2) — 2 cases
United States v. Raymond Lee Scott, 450 F.3d 863 (9th Cir. 2006). “See Nev.Rev.Stat. § 178.4851(2); see also id.”
United States v. Raymond Lee Scott, 424 F.3d 888 (9th Cir. 2005). “See Nev.Rev.Stat. § 178.4851(2); see also id.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 178.4851(3) — 1 case
Johnston v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 2022 NV 67 (Nev. 2022). “And we hold that NRS 178.4851 and Valdez-Jimenez require the district court to make findings of fact on the record that each condition of pretrial release is the least restrictive means of ensuring public safety and the defendant's return to court.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 178.4851(4) — 1 case
Johnston v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 2022 NV 67 (Nev. 2022). “And we hold that NRS 178.4851 and Valdez-Jimenez require the district court to make findings of fact on the record that each condition of pretrial release is the least restrictive means of ensuring public safety and the defendant's return to court.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 178.4851(7) — 1 case
Johnston v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 2022 NV 67 (Nev. 2022). “And we hold that NRS 178.4851 and Valdez-Jimenez require the district court to make findings of fact on the record that each condition of pretrial release is the least restrictive means of ensuring public safety and the defendant's return to court.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 178.4851(7)(a) — 1 case
Johnston v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 2022 NV 67 (Nev. 2022). “And we hold that NRS 178.4851 and Valdez-Jimenez require the district court to make findings of fact on the record that each condition of pretrial release is the least restrictive means of ensuring public safety and the defendant's return to court.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 178.4851(7)(c) — 1 case
Johnston v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 2022 NV 67 (Nev. 2022). “And we hold that NRS 178.4851 and Valdez-Jimenez require the district court to make findings of fact on the record that each condition of pretrial release is the least restrictive means of ensuring public safety and the defendant's return to court.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 178.4851(9) — 1 case
Johnston v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 2022 NV 67 (Nev. 2022). “And we hold that NRS 178.4851 and Valdez-Jimenez require the district court to make findings of fact on the record that each condition of pretrial release is the least restrictive means of ensuring public safety and the defendant's return to court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.