Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 21.330 (2026)
Proceedings on claim of third party to property or on denial of debt to judgment debtor
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 21.330 Proceedings on claim of third party to property or on denial of
debt to judgment debtor. If it
appears that a person or corporation alleged to have property of the judgment
debtor, or indebted to the judgment debtor, claims an interest in the property
adverse to him or her, or denies the debt, the court or judge may authorize, by
an order made to that effect, the judgment creditor to institute an action
against such person or corporation for the recovery of such interest or debt;
and the court or judge may, by order, forbid a transfer or other disposition of
such interest or debt until an action can be commenced and prosecuted to
judgment. Such order may be modified or vacated by the judge granting the same,
or the court in which the action is brought, at any time, upon such terms as
may be just.
[1911 CPA § 371; RL § 5313; NCL § 8869]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1999–2019 · leading case: Greene v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court, 990 P.2d 184 (Nev. 1999).
Greene v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court, 990 P.2d 184 (Nev. 1999). “On January 30, 1998, Anderson filed a motion pursuant to NRS 21.330 for leave to amend his complaint to set aside fraudulent conveyances and for an order forbidding any transfer or other disposition of assets.”
Gallegos v. Malco Enter. of Nevada, Inc., 255 P.3d 1287 (Nev. 2011). “As a preliminary matter, the district court erroneously focused its analysis on NRS 21.330. NRS 21.330 allows for execution against property held by a third party that allegedly belongs to a judgment debtor and does not apply when a creditor seeks to execute against property…”
Mona Vs. Dist. Ct. (far West Indus.), 2016 NV 72 (Nev. 2016). “280 and, to the extent [Rhonda] is considered a third party, pursuant to NRS 21.330, to order [Michael] and [Rhonda] to not dispose and/or transfer their assets.”
Mona Vs. Dist. Ct. (far West Indus.), 2016 NV 72 (Nev. 2016). “280 and, to the extent [Rhonda] is considered a third party, pursuant to NRS 21.330, to order [Michael] and [Rhonda] to not dispose and/or transfer their assets.”
Gallegos v. Malco Enter. of Nevada, Inc., 255 P.3d 1287 (Nev. 2011). “[3] As a preliminary matter, the district court erroneously focused its analysis on NRS 21.330. NRS 21.330 allows for execution against property held by a third party that allegedly belongs to a judgment debtor and does not apply when a creditor seeks to execute against property…”
Kirsch v. Redwood Recovery Serv's., LLC (Nev. 2017). “Finally, personal jurisdiction and leave to proceed under NRS 21.330 are issues that remain in and will be decided by the district court, which we anticipate will proceed as expeditiously as its calendar allows.”
Magliarditi Vs. Transfirst Grp., Inc (Nrap 5) (Nev. 2019). “330 to conclude that when a third party possesses property of a judgment debtor but claims an adverse interest in the property, a court cannot simply order that the property be applied toward the judgment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.