Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 213 - PARDONS AND PAROLES; REMISSIONS OF FINES AND COMMUTATIONS OF PUNISHMENTS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 213.1213 (2026)

Eligibility for parole of prisoner sentenced to serve two or more concurrent sentences; eligibility for parole of prisoner sentenced to serve two or more consecutive sentences of life imprisonment with the possibility of parole

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 213.1213  Eligibility for parole of prisoner sentenced to serve two or more concurrent sentences; eligibility for parole of prisoner sentenced to serve two or more consecutive sentences of life imprisonment with the possibility of parole.

      1.  If a prisoner is sentenced pursuant to NRS 176.035 to serve two or more concurrent sentences, whether or not the sentences are identical in length or other characteristics, eligibility for parole from any of the concurrent sentences must be based on the sentence which requires the longest period before the prisoner is eligible for parole.

      2.  Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if a prisoner is sentenced pursuant to NRS 176.035 to serve two or more consecutive sentences of life imprisonment with the possibility of parole:

      (a) For offenses committed on or after July 1, 2009, but before July 1, 2014:

             (1) All minimum sentences for such offenses must be aggregated;

             (2) The prisoner shall be deemed to be eligible for parole from all such sentences after serving the minimum aggregate sentence; and

             (3) The Board is not required to consider the prisoner for parole until the prisoner has served the minimum aggregate sentence.

      (b) For offenses committed before July 1, 2009, in cases in which the prisoner has not previously been considered for parole for any such offenses:

             (1) The prisoner may, by submitting a written request to the Director of the Department of Corrections before July 1, 2014, make an irrevocable election to have the minimum sentences for such offenses aggregated; and

             (2) If the prisoner makes such an irrevocable election to have the minimum sentences for such offenses aggregated, the Board is not required to consider the prisoner for parole until the prisoner has served the minimum aggregate sentence.

      (Added to NRS by 1993, 137; A 2009, 1546; 2013, 230)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1994–2022 · leading case: Robbins v. Hutchins, No. 2:20-cv-02087 (D. Nev. July 20, 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Robbins v. Hutchins, No. 2:20-cv-02087 (D. Nev. July 20, 2022). · cites it 2× “Robbins 9 contends that 25 months have been added to his sentence because the NDOC incorrectly applied 10 Nev. Rev. Stat. § 213.1213 , instead of following Nev.”
Newton, Jr. (Charles) v. State, No. 72387 (Nev. June 15, 2017). “NRS 213.1213(1) provides that when a prisoner is serving concurrent sentences, "eligibility for parole from any of the concurrent sentences must be based on the sentence which requires the longest period before the prisoner is eligible for parole.”
Thomas v. Williams, No. 3:21-cv-00096 (D. Nev. July 15, 2021). “" However, another law stated, at the time, "Except as 10 otherwise provided in NRS 213.1213 and as limited by statute for certain specified 11 offenses, a prisoner who was sentenced to prison for a crime committed on or after July 12 1, 1995, may be paroled when he has served…”
Parra (Julio) v. Warden, No. 65076 (Nev. June 12, 2014). “NRS 213.1213(1) provides that eligibility for parole for a prisoner sentenced to two or more concurrent sentences is based on the sentence with the longest term before the prisoner is eligible for parole.”
Mack (Christopher) v. State, No. 65307 (Nev. Sept. 17, 2014). “NRS 213.1213(1) provides that eligibility for parole for a prisoner sentenced to two or more concurrent sentences is based on the sentence with the longest term before the prisoner is eligible for parole.”
Greene v. State, 885 P.2d 609 (Nev. 1994). “120 (emphasis added) provides that “[ejxcept as otherwise provided in NRS 213.1213 and as limited by statute for certain specified offenses, a prisoner may be paroled when he has served one-third of the definite period of time for which he has been sentenced pursuant to NRS 176.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 213.1213(1): 3 cases
Newton, Jr. (Charles) v. State, No. 72387 (Nev. June 15, 2017). “NRS 213.1213(1) provides that when a prisoner is serving concurrent sentences, "eligibility for parole from any of the concurrent sentences must be based on the sentence which requires the longest period before the prisoner is eligible for parole.”
Parra (Julio) v. Warden, No. 65076 (Nev. June 12, 2014). “NRS 213.1213(1) provides that eligibility for parole for a prisoner sentenced to two or more concurrent sentences is based on the sentence with the longest term before the prisoner is eligible for parole.”
Mack (Christopher) v. State, No. 65307 (Nev. Sept. 17, 2014). “NRS 213.1213(1) provides that eligibility for parole for a prisoner sentenced to two or more concurrent sentences is based on the sentence with the longest term before the prisoner is eligible for parole.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.