NRS
213.1511 Inquiry to determine probable cause to believe violation
occurred: Inquiring officer; place and time of inquiry; oaths.
1. Before a parolee who has been arrested
and is in custody for a violation of his or her parole may be returned to the
custody of the Department of Corrections for that violation, an inquiry must be
conducted to determine whether there is probable cause to believe that the
parolee has committed acts that would constitute such a violation.
2. The inquiry must be conducted before an
inquiring officer who:
(a) Is not directly involved in the case;
(b) Has not made the report of the violation; and
(c) Has not recommended revocation of the parole,
Ê but the
inquiring officer need not be a judicial officer.
3. Except in a case where the parolee is a
fugitive, the inquiry must be held at or reasonably near the place of the
alleged violation or the arrest and within 15 working days after the arrest.
4. Any conviction for violating a federal
or state law or a local ordinance, except a minor traffic offense, which is
committed while the prisoner is on parole constitutes probable cause for the
purposes of subsection 1 and the inquiry required therein need not be held.
5. For the purposes of this section, the
inquiring officer may administer oaths.
(Added to NRS by 1975,
196; A 1979,
169; 1983,
269, 726;
1993,
2885; 2001
Special Session, 203)
Notes of Decisions
Johnson (Corey) v. State (Nev. 2022).
· cites it 7× “NRS 213.1511 states the inquiry generally must be held “within 15 working days \Having considered the pro se brief filed by appellant, we conclude that a response is not necessary, NRAP 46A(c), and that oral argument is not warranted, NRAP 34(f(3).”
Tilbe v. Entitas Found., Inc., 499 F. Supp. 817 (D. Nev. 1980).
“Plaintiff offered no evidentiary support for this allegation, and NRS 213.1511(1), (2) seems to explicitly refute the possibility.”
Bowman v. LV Metro. Police Dept. (D. Nev. 2024).
· cites it 3× “15103(1)(a)(“If there are no other criminal 13 charges pending or warrants outstanding for the parolee, the Division shall take 14 custody of the parolee within [f]ive working days after the inquiry held pursuant 15 to NRS 213.1511 is conducted.”). A parolee is entitled to a…”
Johnson v. Johnson (D. Nev. 2021).
· cites it 2× “30 13 In ground [2],31 Johnson alleges he was arrested on April 16, 2020. He was transferred to 14 HDSP on April 21, 2020, where his preliminary inquiry hearing occurred on May 21, 2020.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 213.1511(1) — 1 case
Tilbe v. Entitas Found., Inc., 499 F. Supp. 817 (D. Nev. 1980).
“Plaintiff offered no evidentiary support for this allegation, and NRS 213.1511(1), (2) seems to explicitly refute the possibility.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 213.1511(3) — 1 case
Johnson (Corey) v. State (Nev. 2022).
“NRS 213.1511 states the inquiry generally must be held “within 15 working days \Having considered the pro se brief filed by appellant, we conclude that a response is not necessary, NRAP 46A(c), and that oral argument is not warranted, NRAP 34(f(3).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.