Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 31 - ATTACHMENT, GARNISHMENT AND OTHER EXTRAORDINARY REMEDIES

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 31.270

Service of writ; tender of garnishee’s fees

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 31.270  Service of writ; tender of garnishee’s fees.

      1.  The writ of garnishment shall be served by the sheriff of the county where the garnishee defendant is found, unless the court directs otherwise, in the same manner as provided by rule of court or law of this state for the service of a summons in a civil action.

      2.  At the time of the service of the writ of garnishment, the garnishee shall be paid or tendered by the plaintiff in the action or the officer serving the writ a fee of $5, and unless such sum is paid or tendered to the garnishee defendant or the person upon whom service is made for the garnishee defendant, service shall be deemed incomplete.

      [1911 CPA § 230; A 1953, 548]—(NRS A 1973, 1182)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2008–2022 · leading case: Frank Settelmeyer & Sons, Inc. v. Smith & Harmer, Ltd.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Frank Settelmeyer & Sons, Inc. v. Smith & Harmer, Ltd. (2008) nev “10 NRS 31.270(1). 11 NRS 31.280. 12 Valley Bank of Nevada v.”
MONA VS. DIST. CT. (FAR WEST INDUS.) (2016) nev · cites it 2× “120; NRS 31.270; see also C.H.A. Venture v. G.”
Car-Freshner Corporation v. Scented Promotions, LLC (2022) nvd · cites it 2× “20 9 Nev. Rev. Stat. §§ 31.270 ; 31.280. 21 10 Henry v.”
MONA VS. DIST. CT. (FAR WEST INDUS.) (2016) nev “nt that the district court was attempting to sanction Rhonda under NRCP 37, as trustee of the Mona Family Trust, for failing to produce documents concerning the trust or to appear for an examination, the district court erred in ordering Rhonda's three bank 4 Because Rhonda's…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 31.270(1) — 1 case
Frank Settelmeyer & Sons, Inc. v. Smith & Harmer, Ltd. (2008) nev “10 NRS 31.270(1). 11 NRS 31.280. 12 Valley Bank of Nevada v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.