Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 445B.790 (2026)

Regulations concerning inspection of stations; grounds for denial, suspension or revocation of license of inspector or station

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 445B.790  Regulations concerning inspection of stations; grounds for denial, suspension or revocation of license of inspector or station.

      1.  The Department of Motor Vehicles shall, by regulation, establish procedures for inspecting authorized inspection stations, authorized stations and fleet stations, and may require the holder of a license for an authorized inspection station, authorized station or fleet station to submit any material or document which is used in the program to control emissions from motor vehicles.

      2.  The Department may deny, suspend or revoke the license of an approved inspector, authorized inspection station, authorized station or fleet station if:

      (a) The approved inspector or the holder of a license for an authorized inspection station, authorized station or fleet station is not complying with the provisions of NRS 445B.700 to 445B.815, inclusive.

      (b) The holder of a license for an authorized inspection station, authorized station or fleet station refuses to furnish the Department with the requested material or document.

      (c) The approved inspector has issued a fraudulent certificate of compliance, whether intentionally or negligently. A “fraudulent certificate” includes, but is not limited to:

             (1) A backdated certificate;

             (2) A postdated certificate; and

             (3) A certificate issued without an inspection.

      (d) The approved inspector does not follow the prescribed test procedure.

      (Added to NRS by 1977, 919; A 1979, 1034; 1985, 1994; 1993, 2857; 1995, 94; 2001, 2620; 2003, 1412; 2015, 80; 2019, 2914, 4345)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2008–2008 · leading case: Nellis Motors v. State, Dep't of Motor Vehs., 197 P.3d 1061 (Nev. 2008).
Nellis Motors v. State, Dep't of Motor Vehs., 197 P.3d 1061 (Nev. 2008). · cites it 3× “Nevada’s legislative intent Nellis Motors argues that the appropriate evidentiary standard should be clear and convincing evidence because when the DMV seeks to revoke emissions licenses under NRS 445B.790 and 445B.800, it is essentially alleging fraud.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 445B.790(2): 1 case
Nellis Motors v. State, Dep't of Motor Vehs., 197 P.3d 1061 (Nev. 2008). “Nevada’s legislative intent Nellis Motors argues that the appropriate evidentiary standard should be clear and convincing evidence because when the DMV seeks to revoke emissions licenses under NRS 445B.790 and 445B.800, it is essentially alleging fraud.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 445B.790(2)(c): 1 case
Nellis Motors v. State, Dep't of Motor Vehs., 197 P.3d 1061 (Nev. 2008). “Nevada’s legislative intent Nellis Motors argues that the appropriate evidentiary standard should be clear and convincing evidence because when the DMV seeks to revoke emissions licenses under NRS 445B.790 and 445B.800, it is essentially alleging fraud.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.