NRS
463.153 Regulations requiring exclusion or ejection of certain persons
from licensed establishments: Hearing; disposition; judicial review.
1. Within 30 days after service by mail or
in person or 60 days after the last publication, as provided in NRS 463.152, the person named may demand a
hearing before the Commission and show cause why the person should have his or
her name taken from such a list. Failure to demand a hearing within the time
allotted in this section precludes the person from having an administrative
hearing, but in no way affects the person’s right to petition for judicial
review as provided in paragraph (b) of subsection 3.
2. Upon receipt of a demand for hearing,
the Commission shall set a time and place for the hearing. This hearing must
not be held later than 30 days after receipt of the demand for the hearing,
unless the time of the hearing is changed by agreement of the Commission and
the person demanding the hearing.
3. If, upon completion of the hearing, the
Commission determines that:
(a) The regulation does not or should not apply
to the person so listed, the Commission shall notify all persons licensed under
NRS 463.220 and 463.225 of its determination.
(b) Placing the person on the exclusion or
ejection list was proper, the Commission shall make and enter in its minutes an
order to that effect. This order is subject to review by any court of competent
jurisdiction in accordance with the provisions of NRS 463.315 to 463.318, inclusive.
(Added to NRS by 1967,
1041; A 1983,
1552; 1985,
717; 1987,
186)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
6
cases (
2 in the last 5 years), 1973–2025 · leading case:
Thomas v. Bible, 694 F. Supp. 750 (D. Nev. 1988).
Thomas v. Bible, 694 F. Supp. 750 (D. Nev. 1988).
· cites it 10× “28.030(1). After the Board has determined that an individual should be placed upon the List, “notice of such determination shall be given to said person,” advising him of his right to a hearing before the Commission pursuant to NGC Reg.”
Spilotro v. State ex rel. Nevada Gaming Comm'n, 661 P.2d 467 (Nev. 1983).
· cites it 2× “312(18) provides that: [a]fter the hearing of a contested matter, the Commission shall render a written decision on the merits which must contain findings of fact, a determination of the issues presented and the penalty to be imposed, if any; and shall thereafter make and enter…”
Spilotro v. State, Ex Rel. Nev. Gaming Com'n, 661 P.2d 467 (Nev. 1983).
· cites it 2× “312(18) provides that: [a]fter the hearing of a contested matter, the Commission shall render a written decision on the merits which must contain findings of fact, a determination of the issues presented and the penalty to be imposed, if any; and shall thereafter make and enter…”
O'Callaghan v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court, 505 P.2d 1215 (Nev. 1973).
“A reading of the Gaming Control Act reveals that the judicial review specified in NRS 463.315 applies to disciplinary or other action against a licensee [NRS 463.”
Hairston v. Nevada Gaming Control Bd. (D. Nev. 2025).
· cites it 5× “He alleges that the Board violated NRS § 463.153 by 15 failing to provide him notice of a complaint seeking to include him on the list.”
Hairston v. Nevada Gaming Control Bd. (D. Nev. 2025).
· cites it 2× “He 25 alleges that the Nevada Gaming Control Board violated NRS § 463.153 by failing to provide 1 || him notice of a complaint seeking to include him on the list.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 463.153(1) — 2 cases
Thomas v. Bible, 694 F. Supp. 750 (D. Nev. 1988).
“28.030(1). After the Board has determined that an individual should be placed upon the List, “notice of such determination shall be given to said person,” advising him of his right to a hearing before the Commission pursuant to NGC Reg.”
Hairston v. Nevada Gaming Control Bd. (D. Nev. 2025).
“He alleges that the Board violated NRS § 463.153 by 15 failing to provide him notice of a complaint seeking to include him on the list.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 463.153(3) — 1 case
O'Callaghan v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court, 505 P.2d 1215 (Nev. 1973).
“A reading of the Gaming Control Act reveals that the judicial review specified in NRS 463.315 applies to disciplinary or other action against a licensee [NRS 463.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 463.153(3)(b) — 1 case
Thomas v. Bible, 694 F. Supp. 750 (D. Nev. 1988).
“28.030(1). After the Board has determined that an individual should be placed upon the List, “notice of such determination shall be given to said person,” advising him of his right to a hearing before the Commission pursuant to NGC Reg.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.