Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 48 - ADMISSIBILITY GENERALLY
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 48.095 (2026)

Subsequent remedial measures

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 48.095  Subsequent remedial measures.

      1.  When, after an event, measures are taken which, if taken previously, would have made the event less likely to occur, evidence of the subsequent measures is not admissible to prove negligence or culpable conduct in connection with the event.

      2.  This section does not require the exclusion of evidence of subsequent remedial measures when offered for another purpose, such as proving ownership, control, feasibility of precautionary measures, or impeachment.

      (Added to NRS by 1971, 781)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1984–2014 · leading case: Jeep Corp. v. Murray, 708 P.2d 297 (Nev. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jeep Corp. v. Murray, 708 P.2d 297 (Nev. 1985). · cites it 9× “Appellants argue that our holding in Ginnis has been vitiated by the subsequent enactment of NRS 48.095 and our recent decision in Jacobson v.”
Jacobson v. Manfredi by Manfredi, 679 P.2d 251 (Nev. 1984). · cites it 2× “NRS 48.095, patterned after Rule 407 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, excludes evidence of subsequent remedial measures to prove negligence or culpable conduct, unless such evidence is offered to prove another purpose such as feasibility of precautionary measures.”
Robinson v. G.G.C., Inc., 808 P.2d 522 (Nev. 1991). “NRS 48.095 provides that subsequent remedial measures are not admissible to prove negligence or culpable conduct.”
Passer v. Gnlv (Nev. 2014). · cites it 3× “NRS 48.095 provides as follows: 1. When, after an event, measures are taken which, if taken previously, would have made the event less likely to occur, evidence of the subsequent measures is not admissible to prove negligence or culpable conduct in connection with the event.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 48.095(2): 2 cases
Jeep Corp. v. Murray, 708 P.2d 297 (Nev. 1985). “Appellants argue that our holding in Ginnis has been vitiated by the subsequent enactment of NRS 48.095 and our recent decision in Jacobson v.”
Passer v. Gnlv (Nev. 2014). “NRS 48.095 provides as follows: 1. When, after an event, measures are taken which, if taken previously, would have made the event less likely to occur, evidence of the subsequent measures is not admissible to prove negligence or culpable conduct in connection with the event.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.