Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 5.073 (2026)
Conformity of practice and proceedings to those of justice courts; exception; imposition and collection of fees
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 5.073 Conformity of practice and proceedings to those of justice
courts; exception; imposition and collection of fees.
1. The practice and proceedings in the municipal court must conform, as nearly as practicable, to the practice and proceedings of justice courts in similar cases. An appeal perfected transfers the action to the district court for trial anew, unless the municipal court is designated as a court of record as provided in NRS 5.010. The municipal court must be treated and considered as a justice court whenever the proceedings thereof are called into question.
2. Each municipal judge shall charge and collect such fees prescribed in NRS 4.060 that are within the jurisdictional limits of the municipal court.
(Added to NRS by 1989, 903; A 1991, 455; 1997, 115)
RESIDENTIAL CONFINEMENT
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1991–2023 · leading case: Blackjack Bonding v. City of Las Vegas Mun. Court, 14 P.3d 1275 (Nev. 2000).
Blackjack Bonding v. City of Las Vegas Mun. Court, 14 P.3d 1275 (Nev. 2000). “From 1991 to 1997, NRS 5.073 (now NRS 5.073(1)) read, in pertinent part: The practice and proceedings in the municipal court must conform, as nearly as practicable, to the practice and proceedings of justices’ courts in similar cases.”
Sandstrom v. Second Jud. Dist. Court of Nevada ex rel. Cnty. of Washoe, 119 P.3d 1250 (Nev. 2005). “595 provides that “[ajppeals to the district court may be taken from any final judgment of the municipal court in accordance with the provisions of NRS 5.073.” NRS 5.073(1) requires: The practice and proceedings in the municipal court must conform, as nearly as practicable, to…”
City of Las Vegas v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court, 188 P.3d 55 (Nev. 2008). “595, and NRS 5.073. 5 At the hearing before the district court, Meunier began her argument by addressing whether she resided with Bocharski.”
City of Las Vegas v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court, 822 P.2d 115 (Nev. 1991). “See NRS 5.073. The ability of the municipal court to enforce its judgments would be greatly diminished.”
Stilwell v. City of North Las Vegas, 311 P.3d 1177 (Nev. 2013). “He appealed his convictions to the district court for trial anew as provided by NRS 5.073(1) and NRS 266.595. Rather than try the charges de novo in district court, the prosecution dismissed them with prejudice.”
Patterson v. Las Vegas Mun. Court, 535 P.3d 657 (Nev. 2023). “In particular, Patterson points to NRS 5.073 and NRS 266.550. NRS 5.073(1) provides that "[t]he practice and proceedings in the municipal court must conform, as nearly as practicable, to the practice and proceedings of justice courts in similar cases.”
Sparks (lawrence) Vs. Bare, 2016 NV 43 (Nev. 2016). “2 See NRS 5.073(1) (providing that "municipal court must be treated and considered as a justice court whenever the proceedings thereof are called into question" and that an appeal "transfers the action to the district court for trial anew, unless the municipal court is…”
Masters (Joshua) v. Dist. Ct. (City of Las Vegas) C/W 69602 (Nev. 2016). “6, § 6; NRS 5.073(1); NRS 266.565(1); NRS 266.595; Tripp 'The first NRS 484C.”
Sparks (lawrence) Vs. Bare, 2016 NV 43 (Nev. 2016). “2 See NRS 5.073(1) (providing that "municipal court must be treated and considered as a justice court whenever the proceedings thereof are called into question" and that an appeal "transfers the action to the district court for trial anew, unless the municipal court is…”
Clausen v. Dist. Ct. (City of Las Vegas) (Nev. 2015). “The costs of the transcripts may be assessed to a nonindigent appellant. See NRS 4.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 5.073(1): 8 cases
Sandstrom v. Second Jud. Dist. Court of Nevada ex rel. Cnty. of Washoe, 119 P.3d 1250 (Nev. 2005). “595 provides that “[ajppeals to the district court may be taken from any final judgment of the municipal court in accordance with the provisions of NRS 5.073.” NRS 5.073(1) requires: The practice and proceedings in the municipal court must conform, as nearly as practicable, to…”
Blackjack Bonding v. City of Las Vegas Mun. Court, 14 P.3d 1275 (Nev. 2000). “From 1991 to 1997, NRS 5.073 (now NRS 5.073(1)) read, in pertinent part: The practice and proceedings in the municipal court must conform, as nearly as practicable, to the practice and proceedings of justices’ courts in similar cases.”
Stilwell v. City of North Las Vegas, 311 P.3d 1177 (Nev. 2013). “He appealed his convictions to the district court for trial anew as provided by NRS 5.073(1) and NRS 266.595. Rather than try the charges de novo in district court, the prosecution dismissed them with prejudice.”
Sparks (lawrence) Vs. Bare, 2016 NV 43 (Nev. 2016). “2 See NRS 5.073(1) (providing that "municipal court must be treated and considered as a justice court whenever the proceedings thereof are called into question" and that an appeal "transfers the action to the district court for trial anew, unless the municipal court is…”
Patterson v. Las Vegas Mun. Court, 535 P.3d 657 (Nev. 2023). “In particular, Patterson points to NRS 5.073 and NRS 266.550. NRS 5.073(1) provides that "[t]he practice and proceedings in the municipal court must conform, as nearly as practicable, to the practice and proceedings of justice courts in similar cases.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 5.073(2): 1 case
Blackjack Bonding v. City of Las Vegas Mun. Court, 14 P.3d 1275 (Nev. 2000). “From 1991 to 1997, NRS 5.073 (now NRS 5.073(1)) read, in pertinent part: The practice and proceedings in the municipal court must conform, as nearly as practicable, to the practice and proceedings of justices’ courts in similar cases.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.