NRS
501.100 Legislative declaration regarding wildlife.
1. Wildlife in this State not domesticated
and in its natural habitat is part of the natural resources belonging to the
people of the State of Nevada.
2. The preservation, protection,
management and restoration of wildlife within the State contribute immeasurably
to the aesthetic, recreational and economic aspects of these natural resources.
[Part 8:101:1947; A 1949,
292; 1943 NCL § 3035.08]—(NRS A 1969,
1347)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
3
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1988–2021 · leading case:
State v. Morros, 766 P.2d 263 (Nev. 1988).
State v. Morros, 766 P.2d 263 (Nev. 1988).
· cites it 2× “Nevada law recognizes the recreational value of wildlife, NRS 501.100(2), 4 and the need to provide wildlife with water.”
Nevada Dep't of Wildlife v. Bentz, 792 P.2d 28 (Nev. 1990).
· cites it 5× “*298 The third issue presented is whether the court erred in holding that GCR 173 fails to protect wildlife for economic reasons pursuant to NRS 501.100. NRS 501.100 states: 1. Wildlife in this state not domesticated and in its natural habitat is part of the natural resources…”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 501.100(2): 3 cases
State v. Morros, 766 P.2d 263 (Nev. 1988).
“Nevada law recognizes the recreational value of wildlife, NRS 501.100(2), 4 and the need to provide wildlife with water.”
Nevada Dep't of Wildlife v. Bentz, 792 P.2d 28 (Nev. 1990).
“*298 The third issue presented is whether the court erred in holding that GCR 173 fails to protect wildlife for economic reasons pursuant to NRS 501.100. NRS 501.100 states: 1. Wildlife in this state not domesticated and in its natural habitat is part of the natural resources…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.