Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616C.320 (2026)
Resolution of disputed decision of self-insured employer or employer who is member of association of self-insured public or private employers or insured by private carrier
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 616C.320 Resolution of disputed decision of self-insured employer or
employer who is member of association of self-insured public or private
employers or insured by private carrier. If
an employee of a self-insured employer, an employer who is a member of an
association of self-insured public or private employers or an employer insured
by a private carrier is dissatisfied with a decision of his or her employer,
the association or the private carrier, the employee may seek to resolve the
dispute pursuant to NRS 616C.315 to 616C.385, inclusive.
(Added to NRS by 1979, 1039; A 1993, 737; 1995, 2032; 2025, 3311)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2010–2020 · leading case: Assoc. Risk Mgmt., Inc. Vs. Ibanez, 2020 NV 91 (Nev. 2020).
Assoc. Risk Mgmt., Inc. Vs. Ibanez, 2020 NV 91 (Nev. 2020). “Ibanez sought review of ARM's determinations pursuant to NRS 616C.320. The hearing officer initially affirmed ARM's denial of benefits, but the appeals officer reversed, granting Ibanez PTD status pursuant to the "odd-lot doctrine.”
City of Las Vegas v. Lawson, 245 P.3d 1175 (Nev. 2010). “315; NRS 616C.320. The hearing officer concluded that “a medical question exists relative to the etiology of [Lawson’s] diagnosed breast cancer” and remanded the matter to the City for a new determination, without addressing the timeliness of Lawson’s claim.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.