Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 645 - REAL ESTATE BROKERS AND SALESPERSONS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 645.690 (2026)

Revocation, suspension or denial of renewal of license, permit or registration: Hearing; transcript

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 645.690  Revocation, suspension or denial of renewal of license, permit or registration: Hearing; transcript.

      1.  The hearing on the charges must be held at such time and place as the Commission prescribes. The hearing may be held by the Commission or a majority thereof, and the hearing must be held, if the licensee, permittee or owner-developer so requests in writing, within the northern or southern district, as set forth in NRS 645.100, within which the principal place of business of the licensee, permittee or owner-developer is situated.

      2.  At the hearing, a stenographic transcript of the proceedings must be made if requested or required for judicial review. Any party to the proceedings desiring a transcript must be furnished with a copy upon payment to the Division of the reasonable cost of transcription.

      [Part 21:150:1947; A 1955, 19]—(NRS A 1963, 1075; 1979, 1552; 1981, 1613; 1985, 1273; 2001, 524)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1963–1979 · leading case: Laman v. Nevada Real Est. Advisory Comm'n, 589 P.2d 166 (Nev. 1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Laman v. Nevada Real Est. Advisory Comm'n, 589 P.2d 166 (Nev. 1979). · cites it 3× “Appellant suggests that the admission of this statement, and the Commission’s purported reliance thereon, is a violation of NRS 645.690(2), which provides that at the hearing required before the revocation or suspension of a real estate license, the licensee shall be entitled:…”
Randono v. Nevada Real Est. Comm'n, 379 P.2d 537 (Nev. 1963). “: The Nevada Real Estate Commission, proceeding under NRS 645.690, ordered the revocation of all licenses issued by it to Randono.”
Flanders v. State, Dep't of Com., Real Est. Div., 486 P.2d 499 (Nev. 1971). “Although respondent’s counsel was aware respondent’s investigator was deceased, and must have known NRS 645.690 entitles a licensee “[t]o examine, either in person or by counsel, any and all persons complaining against him, as well as other witnesses whose testimony is relied…”
Briant v. Nevada Real Est. Comm'n, 393 P.2d 617 (Nev. 1964). “*360 OPINION Per Curiam,: In a proceeding under NRS 645.690 the Nevada Real Estate Commission revoked the broker’s license of Briant, and suspended the licenses of Bullard and Buckley, salesmen for Briant.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 645.690(2): 1 case
Laman v. Nevada Real Est. Advisory Comm'n, 589 P.2d 166 (Nev. 1979). “Appellant suggests that the admission of this statement, and the Commission’s purported reliance thereon, is a violation of NRS 645.690(2), which provides that at the hearing required before the revocation or suspension of a real estate license, the licensee shall be entitled:…”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 645.690(2)(a): 1 case
Laman v. Nevada Real Est. Advisory Comm'n, 589 P.2d 166 (Nev. 1979). “Appellant suggests that the admission of this statement, and the Commission’s purported reliance thereon, is a violation of NRS 645.690(2), which provides that at the hearing required before the revocation or suspension of a real estate license, the licensee shall be entitled:…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.