Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 686A - TRADE PRACTICES AND FRAUDS; FINANCING OF PREMIUMS
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 686A.420 (2026)

Contents of agreement

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 686A.420  Contents of agreement.

      1.  An agreement executed in this state must be dated and signed by the insured. The printed portion of the agreement must be in not less than 8-point type. The agreement must include:

      (a) The name and the address and telephone number of the business of the producer of insurance for the insurance contract to which the agreement relates;

      (b) The name and the address of the business or residence of the insured;

      (c) The name, address and telephone number of the company to which payments must be made;

      (d) A brief description of any insurance policy involved; and

      (e) Such other information as may be required by the Commissioner.

      2.  An agreement must have at its top in type which is more prominent than the text of the agreement, the words “Agreement For Financing Premium” or words of similar meaning. An agreement must contain a notice in type which is more prominent than the text of the agreement which reads as follows:

 

       Notice:

       1.  Do not sign this agreement before you have read it or if it contains any blank spaces.

       2.  You are entitled to a copy of this agreement which is complete.

 

      (Added to NRS by 1985, 1155; A 2017, 2340)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2009–2009 · leading case: AICCO, Inc. v. Lisowski (In Re Silver State Helicopters, LLC), 403 B.R. 849 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
AICCO, Inc. v. Lisowski (In Re Silver State Helicopters, LLC), 403 B.R. 849 (Bankr. D. Nev. 2009). · cites it 2× “Both Orix and the Trustee have argued, however, that (1) the PFAs are invalid under NRS 686A.420 because it lacks the required type size 33 and (2) that AICCO failed to submit to the PFAs to the Nevada Insurance Commissioner for approval under NRS 686A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.