N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. » N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. / Title xii / Chapter 159
New Hampshire Revised Statutes

N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 159:6-e (2026)

Violation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NH-GCgc.nh.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
    159:6-e Violation. – Any person aggrieved by a violation of the licensing sections of this chapter by a licensing entity may petition the superior court of the county in which the alleged violation occurred for injunctive relief. The court shall give proceedings under this chapter priority on the court calendar. Such a petitioner may appear with or without counsel. The petition shall be deemed sufficient if it states facts constituting a violation of the licensing sections of this chapter by the licensing entity, and may be filed by the petitioner or the petitioner's counsel with the clerk of court or the justice. The clerk of court or any justice shall order service by copy of the petition on the licensing entity or a person employed by the entity. If the justice finds that time is of the essence, the justice may order notice by any reasonable means, and shall have authority to issue an order ex parte when the justice reasonably deems such an order necessary to insure compliance with the provisions of this chapter.

Source. 1996, 122:1, eff. Jan. 1, 1997.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2004–2009 · leading case: Garand v. Town of Exeter, 977 A.2d 540 (N.H. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Garand v. Town of Exeter, 977 A.2d 540 (N.H. 2009). · cites it 18× “” Finally, the petition stated: This Petition seeks judicial review and redress pursuant to RSA 159:6-e, a reversal of the licensing authority’s denial, and the issuance of an order directing the Exeter Chief of Police to issue [the plaintiff’s] license and an award of all…”
Bleiler v. Chief, Dover Police Dep't, 927 A.2d 1216 (N.H. 2007). “” RSA 159:6-e (2002). The petitioner argues that because the state constitutional right to bear arms is a fundamental right, we must review the constitutionality of RSA 159:6-b under strict scrutiny.”
Silverstein v. Town of Alexandria, 843 A.2d 963 (N.H. 2004). · cites it 2× “An appeal under RSA 159:6-e is limited to the issue of whether the petitioner is entitled to a license.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.