N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. » N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. / Title xxi / Chapter 265
New Hampshire Revised Statutes

N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 265:82 (2026)

Repealed by 2006, 260:37, XIII, eff. Jan. 1, 2007

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NH-GCgc.nh.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
    265:82 Repealed by 2006, 260:37, XIII, eff. Jan. 1, 2007. –
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 139 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2021 · leading case: State v. Hull, 827 A.2d 1001 (N.H. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Hull, 827 A.2d 1001 (N.H. 2003). · cites it 8× “The defendant, Gregg Hull, appeals his convictions for driving under the influence of liquor (DUI), third offense, see RSA 265:82 (Supp. 2002); RSA 265:82-b, 11(b) (Supp.”
State v. Gallagher, 951 A.2d 130 (N.H. 2008). · cites it 10× “Driving records which showed that Gallagher had previously been convicted pursuant to RSA 265:82 (2004) (repealed 2007), and Hughes pursuant to RSA 265:82-a (2004) (repealed 2007), were the bases for the trial court’s finding that each was guilty of a second offense.”
State v. Barkus, 888 A.2d 398 (N.H. 2005). · cites it 7× “See RSA 265:82 (2004). She argues that the Salem District Court (Korbey, J.”
State v. Taylor, 566 A.2d 172 (N.H. 1989). · cites it 6× “RSA 265:82, 1(a) (Supp. 1988). On appeal he argues that the Trial Court’s (Dickson, J.”
State v. O'MALEY, 932 A.2d 1 (N.H. 2007). · cites it 4× “See RSA 265:82 (2004); RSA 265:82-b (Supp.2006).”
State v. Levey, 445 A.2d 1089 (N.H. 1982). · cites it 7× “1979) (current version at RSA 265:82 I), as amended by Laws 1981, 543:2.”
State v. Callahan, 489 A.2d 130 (N.H. 1985). · cites it 12× “Callahan was found guilty of a violation of RSA 265:82 (1982) (now codified at RSA 265:82 (Supp.”
Commonwealth v. Faherty, 99 N.E.3d 821 (Mass. App. Ct. 2018). · cites it 2× “1 For the relevant statutes in effect at the time of the earlier offenses, see N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 265:82 (I) (2004) ; N.”
State v. Koppel, 499 A.2d 977 (N.H. 1985). · cites it 3× “RSA 265:82 (Supp. 1983). In advance of trial, both moved to suppress certain items of evidence, arguing that the use of the roadblocks by the police violated their rights under the State and Federal Constitutions.”
State v. Clyde, 766 A.2d 250 (N.H. 2000). · cites it 11× “See RSA 265:82,1(a) (Supp. 1999). The defendant argues, among other things, that there was insufficient evidence at trial to support her conviction, and that the trial court erred in failing to find that evidence of her blood alcohol concentration of 0.”
State v. Winstead, 836 A.2d 775 (N.H. 2003). · cites it 3× “See RSA 265:82 (Supp. 2002). On appeal, he contends that: (1) the trial court erred when it admitted the results of his blood alcohol test; (2) he was denied equal protection of the law; and (3) the evidence was insufficient to prove he was in control of the vehicle.”
State v. L'Heureux, 846 A.2d 1193 (N.H. 2004). · cites it 5× “See RSA 265:82, 1(b) (Supp. 2003). On appeal, the defendant argues that the trial judge erred in finding, as a matter of law, that the defense of competing harms was unavailable to him.”
Show all 139 citing cases →
N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 265:82(1): 1 case
Snyder v. PennDOT, 38 Pa. D. & C.4th 504 (1998).
N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 265:82(I)(a): 4 cases
Exxon Corp. v. Esso Workers' Union, Inc., 118 F.3d 841 (1st Cir. 1997).
Fisher v. Com. Dept. of Transp., 709 A.2d 1008 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1998).
Rouse v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing, 732 A.2d 35 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1999).
Pepperling v. Commonwealth, Dep't of Transp., 737 A.2d 310 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1999).
N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 265:82(b): 1 case
State v. Seavey, 789 A.2d 621 (N.H. 2001).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.