N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. » N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. / Title xxxiv / Chapter 366
New Hampshire Revised Statutes

N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 366:3 (2026)

Filing of Contracts

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NH-GCgc.nh.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
    366:3 Filing of Contracts. – The original or a verified copy of any contract or arrangement and of any modification thereof or a verified summary of any unwritten contract or arrangement, the consideration of which exceeds $500, hereafter entered into between a public utility and an affiliate providing for the furnishing of managerial, supervisory, construction, engineering, accounting, purchasing, financial, or any other services either to or by a public utility or an affiliate shall be filed by the public utility with the department of energy within 10 days after the date on which the contract is executed or the arrangement entered into. The department may also require a public utility to file in such form as the department may require full information with respect to any purchase from or sale to an affiliate, whether or not made in pursuance of a continuing contract or arrangement.

Source. 1933, 182:1. RL 305:2. 2021, 91:254, eff. July 1, 2021.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1988–2005 · leading case: Appeal of Verizon New England, Inc., 889 A.2d 1027 (N.H. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Appeal of Verizon New England, Inc., 889 A.2d 1027 (N.H. 2005). · cites it 10× “The PUC concluded that the 1999 amendment was a modification of an affiliate contract, and that because it was not filed with the PUC pursuant to RSA 366:3 (1995), it was unenforceable in New Hampshire.”
Appeal of Concord Steam Corp., 543 A.2d 905 (N.H. 1988). · cites it 2× “Lanning’s prefiled statement first expressed the PUC staff’s belief that under RSA 366:3, which requires a utility to file with the PUC a copy of any agreement with an “affiliate,” CSC should have obtained the PUC’s approval of the purchase agreement with *425 WFP.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.