New Hampshire Revised Statutes
N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 541:6 (2026)
Appeal
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NH-GCgc.nh.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
541:6 Appeal. –
Within thirty days after the application for a rehearing is denied, or, if the application is granted, then within thirty days after the decision on such rehearing, the applicant may appeal by petition to the supreme court.
Source. 1913, 145:18. PL 239:4. 1937, 107:17; 133:78. RL 414:6.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 192
cases (12 in the last 5 years), 1959–2025 · leading case: Bow Sch. Dist. v. Quentin W., 750 F. Supp. 546 (D.N.H. 1990).
Bow Sch. Dist. v. Quentin W., 750 F. Supp. 546 (D.N.H. 1990). “3 Defendants, on the other hand, urge the adoption of the thirty day statute of limitations under RSA 541:6, 4 which governs appeals from certain state administrative agencies.”
In re Cole, 196 A.3d 950 (N.H. 2018). “DOIT argues that we lack subject matter jurisdiction to answer this question because the SEA/SEIU initially listed itself, not Cole, as the petitioner in this case, and did not move to amend the appeal document with Cole's name until after the 30-day jurisdictional deadline of…”
Appeal of Carreau, 945 A.2d 687 (N.H. 2008). “” RSA 541:6. The board denied the petitioner’s motion for rehearing on August 6,2007.”
Appeal of Concord Nat. Gas Corp., 433 A.2d 1291 (N.H. 1981). “Pursuant to RSA 541:6, they appeal from the PUC’s order adopting the rules relating to advertising by utilities and from the PUC’s denial of their motion for rehearing.”
King v. Town of Hanover, 661 A.2d 228 (N.H. 1995). “The superior court instead dismissed the petition on the basis that the thirty-day limitation period of RSA 541:6 (1974) applied, by analogy, to the plaintiff’s claims.”
In re Goffstown Educ. Support Staff, 846 A.2d 1179 (N.H. 2004). “In March 2003, the union timely filed a motion for rehearing, which the board denied in May 2003.”
Soltani v. Smith, 812 F. Supp. 1280 (D.N.H. 1993). “RSA 541:6. Assuming arguendo (1) that plaintiff has alleged facts sufficient to entitle her to the rights and remedies available under the Act, and (2) that plaintiff has “made a reasonable effort to maintain or restore [her] rights”, RSA 275-E:4 I, the court determines that…”
Stephanie Price et al. v. Lori Shibinette, Comm'r of the New Hampshire Dep't of Health & Human Servs. et al., 2021 DNH 179 (D.N.H. 2021). “See N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 541:6 ; N.H. Sup. Ct.”
Byrne & Jones Enter., Inc. d/b/a Byrne & Jones Constr. v. Monroe City R-1 Sch. Dist., 493 S.W.3d 847 (Mo. 2016). “02 (providing "informal resolution” to "[a]ny person or association who disagrees with an award” within 15 days); N.H. Rev. Stat. § 541:6 (appeal to the supreme court may be taken within 30 days after decision on rehearing); N.”
In re Lorden, 594 A.2d 1303 (N.H. 1991). “Accordingly, the plaintiffs rely on RSA 541:6, which details the procedure available to parties seeking review of certain decisions made by State officials.”
Hebert Ex Rel. Hebert v. Manchester, New Hampshire, Sch. Dist., 833 F. Supp. 80 (D.N.H. 1993). “While plaintiffs’ argument has persuasive appeal from a fairness standpoint, in light of Harper this court is constrained to reject it and apply the 30 day limitation period set out in N.H.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 541:6. Even if the court found plaintiffs’ appeal to have been timely when…”
In re Ellis, 636 A.2d 62 (N.H. 1993). “On October 14,1993, the petitioners filed an appeal by petition purportedly pursuant to RSA 541:6 (1974) from a fair hearings decision of the New Hampshire Division of Human Services.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.