2C:28-4. a. Falsely incriminating another. A person who knowingly gives or causes to be given false information to any law enforcement officer with purpose to implicate another commits a crime of the third degree, except the offense is a crime of the second degree if the false information which the actor gave or caused to be given would implicate the person in a crime of the first or second degree.
For the purposes of this subsection, knowledge of the grade of the crime about which the defendant gave false information is not an element of the offense and it shall not be a defense that the defendant did not know of the grade of the crime. b. Fictitious reports. A person commits a crime of the fourth degree if he:
(1) Reports or causes to be reported to law enforcement authorities an offense or other incident within their concern knowing that it did not occur; or
(2) Pretends to furnish or causes to be furnished such authorities with information relating to an offense or incident when he knows he has no information relating to such offense or incident.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
25
cases (
14 in the last 5 years), 1988–2026 · leading case:
State of New Jersey v. L.S., 132 A.3d 938 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2016).
State of New Jersey v. L.S., 132 A.3d 938 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2016).
· cites it 13× “A person who knowingly gives or causes to be given false information to any law enforcement officer with purpose to implicate another commits a crime of the fourth degree.”
Johnson v. State, 542 A.2d 429 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1988).
· cites it 2× “, N.J. Stat. Ann. § 2C:28-4 (West 1982); 18 Pa.”
Livingston v. City of Englewood New Jersey (D.N.J. 2025).
· cites it 4× “Similarly, Plaintiff cannot maintain his claim for N.J. Stat. Ann. § 2C:28-4(a)5, a state criminal statute, because he does not have standing to assert such a claim.”
Paul D. Lancaster v. New Jersey Transit Corp. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2025).
· cites it 3× “In count three, he alleged harassment and retaliation by defendant Andre Coleman, a regional supervisor, in violation of the LAD, N.J.S.A. 2C:28-4, N.J.S.A. 2C:30-2, N.J.S.”
El v. Atl. City freeholders/Bd. of Commissioners (D.N.J. 2023).
· cites it 2× “False reports to law enforcement agencies, N.J.S.A. § 2C:28-4 is also a criminal offense that does not create a private cause of action against a police officer for alleged false statements in an arrest report.”
R.J.B. v. M.R.G. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2026).
· cites it 2× “2C:33-4(c),4 and false reporting under N.J.S.A. 2C:28-4(b).5 [or she]: (1) [t]akes or detains a minor child with the purpose of concealing the minor child and thereby depriving the child's other parent of custody or parenting time with the minor child[.”
N.J. Stat. § 2C:28-4(a): 9 cases
State of New Jersey v. L.S., 132 A.3d 938 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2016).
“A person who knowingly gives or causes to be given false information to any law enforcement officer with purpose to implicate another commits a crime of the fourth degree.”
Livingston v. City of Englewood New Jersey (D.N.J. 2025).
“Similarly, Plaintiff cannot maintain his claim for N.J. Stat. Ann. § 2C:28-4(a)5, a state criminal statute, because he does not have standing to assert such a claim.”
N.J. Stat. § 2C:28-4(b): 2 cases
State of New Jersey v. L.S., 132 A.3d 938 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2016).
“A person who knowingly gives or causes to be given false information to any law enforcement officer with purpose to implicate another commits a crime of the fourth degree.”
R.J.B. v. M.R.G. (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2026).
“2C:33-4(c),4 and false reporting under N.J.S.A. 2C:28-4(b).5 [or she]: (1) [t]akes or detains a minor child with the purpose of concealing the minor child and thereby depriving the child's other parent of custody or parenting time with the minor child[.”
N.J. Stat. § 2C:28-4(b)(1): 5 cases
State of New Jersey v. L.S., 132 A.3d 938 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2016).
“A person who knowingly gives or causes to be given false information to any law enforcement officer with purpose to implicate another commits a crime of the fourth degree.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.