New Jersey Statutes

N.J. Stat. § 2C:41-6.1 (2026)

Remedies cumulative

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaN.J. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The remedies provided in this act shall be cumulative with each other and other remedies at law.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1990–2025 · leading case: Fairfax Fin. Holdings Ltd. v. S.A.C., 160 A.3d 44 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2017).
Fairfax Fin. Holdings Ltd. v. S.A.C., 160 A.3d 44 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2017). “The New Jersey and federal enactments allow "[a]ny person," who is injured "in his business or property by reason of a violation" of the statute, to "sue therefore" and recover treble damages, plus costs of suit including a reasonable attorney's fee.”
Curley v. Cumberland Farms Dairy, Inc., 728 F. Supp. 1123 (D.N.J. 1990). · cites it 2× “Plaintiffs argue that the New Jersey RICO statute is different from the federal statute because N.J.Stat.Ann. § 2C:41-6.1 states that the “remedies provided in this act shall be cumulative with each other and other remedies at law.”
Semiconductor Energy Lab'y Co. v. Samsung Elec. Co., 204 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2000). “” N.J.S.A. § 2C:41-6.1. Samsung underscores the broad remedies available under the RICO statutes.”
Allstate New Jersey Ins. Co. v. Carteret Comprehensive Med. Care, Pc (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2025). “2017) (fourth alteration in original) (first quoting N.J.S.A. 2C:41-6.1; and then quoting N.J.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.