N.M. Stat. » N.M. Stat. / Chapter 22 / Article 10
New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 22-10-11 (2026)

Recompiled.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar 
ANNOTATIONS

Recompilations. — Laws 2003, ch. 153, § 72 recompiled former 22-10-11 NMSA 1978
as 22-10A-21 NMSA 1978, effective April 4, 2003.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1980–2001 · leading case: Swinney v. Deming Bd. of Educ., 873 P.2d 238 (N.M. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Swinney v. Deming Bd. of Educ., 873 P.2d 238 (N.M. 1994). · cites it 14× “Before examining the contractual rights that Swinney contends entitle him to notice and a hearing, we first look at the different treatment afforded teachers and administrators in our statutes and case law.”
Bd. of Educ. of Alamogordo Pub. Schs. Dist. No. 1 v. Jennings, 651 P.2d 1037 (N.M. Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 9× “1978] that would indicate that a binding contract was not made? Local Board contends that under § 22-10-11(A), N.M.S.A. 1978, there was no binding contract because it was not on the proper form.”
State Ex Rel. Stratton v. Roswell Indep. Schs., 806 P.2d 1085 (N.M. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 4× “Additionally, we conclude that Casey’s contract is with the Roswell school district, not with the “state” or a “municipality” as the terms are used in article IV, section 28. Finally, Roswell Schools has had the “authority” to enter into an employment contract with Casey for the…”
Keller v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of Albuquerque, 182 F. Supp. 2d 1148 (D.N.M. 2001). · cites it 2× “Temporal Scope of Damages NMSA 1978 § 22-10-11(E) states that “a person employed by contract pursuant to this section has no legitimate expectation of reemployment, and no contract entered into pursuant to this section shall be construed as an implied promise of continued…”
Naranjo v. Bd. of Educ. of the Espanola Pub. Schs., 891 P.2d 542 (N.M. 1995). · cites it 4× “33, § 19 (codified at NMSA 1978, Section 22-10-11 (Repl.Pamp.1993)). That section provides: “Except as provided in Section 22-10-12 NMSA 1978, a person employed by contract pursuant to this section has no legitimate objective expectancy of reemployment, and no contract entered…”
Bd. of Educ. of Alamogordo Pub. Schs. Dist. No. 1 v. Bryant, 624 P.2d 1017 (N.M. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 2× “Section 22-10-11, N.M.S.A.1978 [§ 77-8-8, N.”
— N.M. Stat. § 22-10-11(A) — 1 case
Bd. of Educ. of Alamogordo Pub. Schs. Dist. No. 1 v. Jennings, 651 P.2d 1037 (N.M. Ct. App. 1982). “1978] that would indicate that a binding contract was not made? Local Board contends that under § 22-10-11(A), N.M.S.A. 1978, there was no binding contract because it was not on the proper form.”
— N.M. Stat. § 22-10-11(B)(4) — 1 case
Swinney v. Deming Bd. of Educ., 873 P.2d 238 (N.M. 1994). “Before examining the contractual rights that Swinney contends entitle him to notice and a hearing, we first look at the different treatment afforded teachers and administrators in our statutes and case law.”
— N.M. Stat. § 22-10-11(B)(5) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Stratton v. Roswell Indep. Schs., 806 P.2d 1085 (N.M. Ct. App. 1991). “Additionally, we conclude that Casey’s contract is with the Roswell school district, not with the “state” or a “municipality” as the terms are used in article IV, section 28. Finally, Roswell Schools has had the “authority” to enter into an employment contract with Casey for the…”
— N.M. Stat. § 22-10-11(E) — 3 cases
Swinney v. Deming Bd. of Educ., 873 P.2d 238 (N.M. 1994). “Before examining the contractual rights that Swinney contends entitle him to notice and a hearing, we first look at the different treatment afforded teachers and administrators in our statutes and case law.”
Keller v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of Albuquerque, 182 F. Supp. 2d 1148 (D.N.M. 2001). “Temporal Scope of Damages NMSA 1978 § 22-10-11(E) states that “a person employed by contract pursuant to this section has no legitimate expectation of reemployment, and no contract entered into pursuant to this section shall be construed as an implied promise of continued…”
Naranjo v. Bd. of Educ. of the Espanola Pub. Schs., 891 P.2d 542 (N.M. 1995). “33, § 19 (codified at NMSA 1978, Section 22-10-11 (Repl.Pamp.1993)). That section provides: “Except as provided in Section 22-10-12 NMSA 1978, a person employed by contract pursuant to this section has no legitimate objective expectancy of reemployment, and no contract entered…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.