New Mexico Statutes
N.M. Stat. § 28-1-9 (2026)
Exemptions.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NM-LEGnmonesource.com
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Nothing contained in the Human Rights Act shall:
A. apply to any single-family dwelling sold, leased, subleased or rented by an owner
without the making of any notice, statement or advertisement with respect to the sale,
lease, sublease or rental of a dwelling unit that indicates any preference, limitation or
discrimination based on race, color, religion, national origin, ancestry, sex, sexual
orientation or gender identity. This exemption is subject to these further reservations:
(1) to qualify for the exemption, the seller must not be an owner of or own or
have reserved any interest in more than three single-family dwellings; and
(2) if the seller does not currently live in the dwelling or he was not the most
recent occupant, the exemption granted in this section shall only apply to one sale in
twenty-four months;
B. bar any religious or denominational institution or organization that is operated,
supervised or controlled by or that is operated in connection with a religious or
denominational organization from limiting admission to or giving preference to persons
of the same religion or denomination or from making selections of buyers, lessees or
tenants as are calculated by the organization or denomination to promote the religious
or denominational principles for which it is established or maintained, unless
membership in the religious or denominational organization is restricted on account of
race, color, national origin or ancestry;
C. bar any religious or denominational institution or organization that is operated,
supervised or controlled by or that is operated in connection with a religious or
denominational organization from imposing discriminatory employment or renting
practices that are based upon sexual orientation or gender identity; provided, that the
provisions of the Human Rights Act with respect to sexual orientation and gender
identity shall apply to any other:
(1) for-profit activities of a religious or denominational institution or religious
organization subject to the provisions of Section 511(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended; or
(2) nonprofit activities of a religious or denominational institution or religious
organization subject to the provisions of Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended;
D. apply to rooms or units in dwellings containing living quarters occupied or
intended to be occupied by no more than four families living independently of each
other, if the owner actually maintains and occupies one of the living quarters as his
residence;
E. apply to public restrooms, public showers, public dressing facilities or sleeping
quarters in public institutions, where the preference or limitation is based on sex; and
F. prevent the mandatory retirement of an employee upon reaching the age of sixty-
five years or older, if the employer is operating under a retirement plan that meets the
requirements of Public Law 93-406, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974.
History: 1953 Comp., § 4-33-8, enacted by Laws 1969, ch. 196, § 8; 1973, ch. 58, § 2;
1975, ch. 78, § 1; 2003, ch. 383, § 4; 2004, ch. 115, § 2.
ANNOTATIONS
Cross references. — For the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974, see 26 U.S.C. § 410 et seq.
For Section 511(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, see 26 U.S.C. § 511(a).
For Section 501(c)(3), see 26 U.S.C. § 501(c)(3).
The 2004 amendment, effective July 1, 2004, deleted Subsection G, which provided
that the Human Rights Act does not apply to a business that employs fourteen or fewer
full-time employees.
The 2003 amendment, effective July 1, 2003, substituted "sex, sexual orientation or
gender identity" for "or sex" following "national origin, ancestry" in Subsection A; in
Paragraph A(2), substituted "does not currently" for "doesn't presently" near the
beginning, deleted "then" following "most recent occupant", substituted "shall" for "will"
following "in this section"; in Subsection B, substituted "that is operated, supervised" for
"which is operated, or supervised" following "institution or organization", inserted "that"
following "controlled by or"; added present Subsection C and redesignated former
Subsections C to E as Subsections D to F; and added Subsection G.
Law reviews. — For article, "Age Discrimination in Employment: A Comparison of the
Federal and State Laws and Remedies in New Mexico," see 7 N.M.L. Rev. 51 (1976-
77).
For article, "Selecting an Analogous State Limitations Statute in Reconstruction Civil
Rights Claims: The Tenth Circuit's Resolution," see 15 N.M.L. Rev. 11 (1985).
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — Validity, construction, and application of
provisions of § 702 of Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USCS § 2000e-1) exempting
activities of religious organizations from operation of Title VII Equal Employment
Opportunity provisions, 67 A.L.R. Fed. 874.
Actions under Age Discrimination in Employment Act (29 USCS §§ 621 to 634)
challenging hiring or retirement practices in law enforcement employment, 79 A.L.R.
Fed. 373.
Validity, construction, and application of § 804 (c) of Civil Rights Act of 1968 (Fair
Housing Act) (42 USCS § 3604 (c)) prohibiting discriminatory notice, statement, or
advertisement with respect to sale or rental of dwelling, 142 A.L.R. Fed. 1Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1985–2024 · leading case: Elane Photography, LLC v. Willock, 2013 NMSC 040 (N.M. 2013).
Elane Photography, LLC v. Willock, 2013 NMSC 040 (N.M. 2013). “” {64} This is a misreading of Section 28-1-9. Unlike the exemptions in Lukumi Babalu Aye, the exemptions in Section 28-1-9(A) and (D) apply equally to religious and secular conduct.”
Dayton Christian Schs., Inc. v. Ohio Civil Rights Comm'n, 766 F.2d 932 (6th Cir. 1985). “§ 10:5-12(a) (1981); N.M.Stat.Ann. § 28-1-9(B) (1975); N.Y.Executive Law § 296(11) (McKinney 1984); Nev.”
Elane Photography, LLC v. Willock, 2013 NMSC 40 (N.M. 2013). “” {64} This is a misreading of Section 28-1-9. Unlike the exemptions in Lukumi Babalu Aye, the exemptions in Section 28-1-9(A) and (D) apply equally to religious and secular conduct.”
South v. Lujan (N.M. Ct. App. 2024). “Thus, looking to the federal statute in context for guidance 6 demonstrates that the NMHRA’s failure to exempt Tribal Nations does not indicate 7 a legislative intent to make Tribal Nations liable for unlawful discriminatory 8 conduct.”
South v. Lujan (N.M. Ct. App. 2024). “Thus, looking to the federal statute in context for guidance demonstrates that the NMHRA’s failure to exempt Tribal Nations does not indicate a legislative intent to make Tribal Nations liable for unlawful discriminatory conduct.”
N.M. Stat. § 28-1-9(A): 2 cases
Elane Photography, LLC v. Willock, 2013 NMSC 040 (N.M. 2013). “” {64} This is a misreading of Section 28-1-9. Unlike the exemptions in Lukumi Babalu Aye, the exemptions in Section 28-1-9(A) and (D) apply equally to religious and secular conduct.”
Elane Photography, LLC v. Willock, 2013 NMSC 40 (N.M. 2013). “” {64} This is a misreading of Section 28-1-9. Unlike the exemptions in Lukumi Babalu Aye, the exemptions in Section 28-1-9(A) and (D) apply equally to religious and secular conduct.”
N.M. Stat. § 28-1-9(A)(1): 2 cases
Elane Photography, LLC v. Willock, 2013 NMSC 040 (N.M. 2013). “” {64} This is a misreading of Section 28-1-9. Unlike the exemptions in Lukumi Babalu Aye, the exemptions in Section 28-1-9(A) and (D) apply equally to religious and secular conduct.”
Elane Photography, LLC v. Willock, 2013 NMSC 40 (N.M. 2013). “” {64} This is a misreading of Section 28-1-9. Unlike the exemptions in Lukumi Babalu Aye, the exemptions in Section 28-1-9(A) and (D) apply equally to religious and secular conduct.”
N.M. Stat. § 28-1-9(A)(2): 2 cases
Elane Photography, LLC v. Willock, 2013 NMSC 040 (N.M. 2013). “” {64} This is a misreading of Section 28-1-9. Unlike the exemptions in Lukumi Babalu Aye, the exemptions in Section 28-1-9(A) and (D) apply equally to religious and secular conduct.”
Elane Photography, LLC v. Willock, 2013 NMSC 40 (N.M. 2013). “” {64} This is a misreading of Section 28-1-9. Unlike the exemptions in Lukumi Babalu Aye, the exemptions in Section 28-1-9(A) and (D) apply equally to religious and secular conduct.”
N.M. Stat. § 28-1-9(B): 3 cases
Elane Photography, LLC v. Willock, 2013 NMSC 040 (N.M. 2013). “” {64} This is a misreading of Section 28-1-9. Unlike the exemptions in Lukumi Babalu Aye, the exemptions in Section 28-1-9(A) and (D) apply equally to religious and secular conduct.”
Dayton Christian Schs., Inc. v. Ohio Civil Rights Comm'n, 766 F.2d 932 (6th Cir. 1985). “§ 10:5-12(a) (1981); N.M.Stat.Ann. § 28-1-9(B) (1975); N.Y.Executive Law § 296(11) (McKinney 1984); Nev.”
Elane Photography, LLC v. Willock, 2013 NMSC 40 (N.M. 2013). “” {64} This is a misreading of Section 28-1-9. Unlike the exemptions in Lukumi Babalu Aye, the exemptions in Section 28-1-9(A) and (D) apply equally to religious and secular conduct.”
N.M. Stat. § 28-1-9(D): 2 cases
Elane Photography, LLC v. Willock, 2013 NMSC 040 (N.M. 2013). “” {64} This is a misreading of Section 28-1-9. Unlike the exemptions in Lukumi Babalu Aye, the exemptions in Section 28-1-9(A) and (D) apply equally to religious and secular conduct.”
Elane Photography, LLC v. Willock, 2013 NMSC 40 (N.M. 2013). “” {64} This is a misreading of Section 28-1-9. Unlike the exemptions in Lukumi Babalu Aye, the exemptions in Section 28-1-9(A) and (D) apply equally to religious and secular conduct.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.