N.M. Stat. » N.M. Stat. / Chapter 32 / Article 10
New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 32-1-38 (2026)

2

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar 
32-1-39     32A-1-17
32-1-40     32A-1-18
32-1-41     32A-1-19
32-1-42     32A-1-20
32-1-43     32A-2-24
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases, 1979–1997 · leading case: State v. ADAM M., 1998-NMCA-014, 953 P.2d 40.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. ADAM M., 1998-NMCA-014, 953 P.2d 40. · cites it 14× “See NMSA 1978, § 32-1-38 (1992) (current version at NMSA 1978, § 32A-2-23 (1995); NMSA 1978, § 32A-2-24 (1993)); State v.”
Spear v. McDermott, 916 P.2d 228 (N.M. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “See NMSA 1978, § 32-1-38 (Repl.Pamp.1989), currently codified at NMSA 1978, § 32A-4-24 (Repl.”
State v. Michael V., 756 P.2d 585 (N.M. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 5× “The state argues that because the court never loses jurisdiction over a child on probation, the sentence term is always subject to modification by the court.”
Matter of Mary L., 778 P.2d 449 (N.M. Ct. App. 1989). · cites it 2× “] NMSA 1978, Section 32-1-38(D) (Repl. 1986), provides also in part that: If the child is an adjudicated abused child, the abused child shall not be returned to the respondent parent * * * without a hearing by the court to determine that the conditions in the home leading to…”
State v. Doe, 619 P.2d 194 (N.M. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 2× “Section 32-1-38(B), supra. The applicable statutory provision is § 32-l-38(A), supra, which reads: A.”
State v. Dennis F., 725 P.2d 595 (N.M. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “§ 32-1-38(A)(1). A child, like an adult, may have his commitment suspended and be placed on probation.”
State Ex Rel. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Patrick R., 729 P.2d 1387 (N.M. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 3× “If the finding is that the child is an abused child, the procedural safeguards of Section 32-1-38 NMSA 1978 shall apply with respect to the return of the child to the respondents.”
State v. Sanders, 628 P.2d 1134 (N.M. Ct. App. 1981). “See § 32-1-38 (1980 Cum.Supp.). Defendant testified that he did not learn of the results of the September 28th hearing until April of 1980.”
Matter of Guardianship Petition of Lupe C., 812 P.2d 365 (N.M. Ct. App. 1991). “1 (requiring predisposition studies); § 32-1-38 (providing limitations on the time a dispositional order may remain in force); § 32-1-38.”
State v. Doe, 612 P.2d 238 (N.M. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 2× “But see § 32-1-38, N.M.S.A. 1978; In re Doe, 85 N.”
State v. Doe, 605 P.2d 256 (N.M. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 2× “Section 32-1-38, N.M.S.A.1978, states in part: A.”
State v. Doe, 598 P.2d 1166 (N.M. Ct. App. 1979). “The commitment to the Boys’ School for two years was improper under § 32-1-38(A), N.M.S.A.1978. State v. Doe, 92 N.”
Show all 13 citing cases →
N.M. Stat. § 32-1-38(0): 1 case
State v. Michael V., 756 P.2d 585 (N.M. Ct. App. 1988). “The state argues that because the court never loses jurisdiction over a child on probation, the sentence term is always subject to modification by the court.”
N.M. Stat. § 32-1-38(A): 1 case
State v. Doe, 598 P.2d 1166 (N.M. Ct. App. 1979). “The commitment to the Boys’ School for two years was improper under § 32-1-38(A), N.M.S.A.1978. State v. Doe, 92 N.”
N.M. Stat. § 32-1-38(A)(1): 1 case
State v. Dennis F., 725 P.2d 595 (N.M. Ct. App. 1986). “§ 32-1-38(A)(1). A child, like an adult, may have his commitment suspended and be placed on probation.”
N.M. Stat. § 32-1-38(B): 1 case
State v. Doe, 619 P.2d 194 (N.M. Ct. App. 1980). “Section 32-1-38(B), supra. The applicable statutory provision is § 32-l-38(A), supra, which reads: A.”
N.M. Stat. § 32-1-38(C): 2 cases
State v. Dennis F., 725 P.2d 595 (N.M. Ct. App. 1986). “§ 32-1-38(A)(1). A child, like an adult, may have his commitment suspended and be placed on probation.”
State v. Michael V., 756 P.2d 585 (N.M. Ct. App. 1988). “The state argues that because the court never loses jurisdiction over a child on probation, the sentence term is always subject to modification by the court.”
N.M. Stat. § 32-1-38(D): 1 case
Matter of Mary L., 778 P.2d 449 (N.M. Ct. App. 1989). “] NMSA 1978, Section 32-1-38(D) (Repl. 1986), provides also in part that: If the child is an adjudicated abused child, the abused child shall not be returned to the respondent parent * * * without a hearing by the court to determine that the conditions in the home leading to…”
N.M. Stat. § 32-1-38(F): 1 case
State v. ADAM M., 1998-NMCA-014, 953 P.2d 40. “See NMSA 1978, § 32-1-38 (1992) (current version at NMSA 1978, § 32A-2-23 (1995); NMSA 1978, § 32A-2-24 (1993)); State v.”
N.M. Stat. § 32-1-38(H): 1 case
State v. ADAM M., 1998-NMCA-014, 953 P.2d 40. “See NMSA 1978, § 32-1-38 (1992) (current version at NMSA 1978, § 32A-2-23 (1995); NMSA 1978, § 32A-2-24 (1993)); State v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.