New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 33-1-17 (2026)

Private contract.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
A. The corrections department may contract for the operation of any adult female
facility or for housing adult female inmates in a private facility with a person or entity in
the business of providing correctional or jail services to government entities.

    B. The corrections department may contract with a person or entity in the business
of providing correctional or jail services to government entities for:

        (1)    a correctional facility in Guadalupe county of not less than five hundred
fifty and not more than two thousand two hundred beds;

      (2)   a correctional facility in Lea, Chaves or Santa Fe county of not less than
one thousand two hundred and not more than two thousand two hundred beds;

       (3)     design and construction of a support services building, a laundry and an
infirmary at the penitentiary of New Mexico in Santa Fe; or

      (4)    construction of a public facility to house a special incarceration alternative
program for adult male and adult female felony offenders.

   C. The authorization in Subsection B of this section for a correctional facility in
Guadalupe county and a correctional facility in Lea, Chaves or Santa Fe county is
contingent upon construction of both facilities, so that one of the facilities shall not be
constructed unless both of the facilities are constructed, as nearly as practicable,
simultaneously.

    D. The corrections department shall solicit proposals and award any contract under
this section in accordance with the provisions of the Procurement Code [13-1-28 to 13-
1-199 NMSA 1978]. The contract shall include such terms and conditions as the
corrections department may require after consultation with the general services
department; provided that the terms and conditions shall include provisions:

       (1)    setting forth comprehensive standards for conditions of incarceration;
      (2)     that the contractor assumes all liability caused by or arising out of all
aspects of the provision or operation of the facility;

       (3)     for liability insurance or other proof of financial responsibility acceptable to
the general services department covering the contractor and its officers, employees and
agents in an amount sufficient to cover all liability caused by or arising out of all aspects
of the provision or operation of the facility;

        (4)   for termination for cause upon ninety days' notice to the contractor for
failure to meet contract provisions when such failure seriously affects the availability or
operation of the facility;

       (5)   that venue for the enforcement of the contract shall be in the district court
for Santa Fe county;

       (6)    that continuation of the contract is subject to the availability of funds; and

      (7)   that compliance with the contract shall be monitored by the corrections
department and the contract may be terminated for noncompliance.

   E. When the contractor begins operation of a facility for which private contractor
operation is authorized, the contractor's employees performing the functions of
correctional officers shall be deemed correctional officers for the purposes of Sections
33-1-10 and 33-1-11 NMSA 1978 but for no other purpose of state law, unless
specifically stated.

    F. Any contract awarded pursuant to this section may include terms to provide for
the renovation of the facility or for the construction of new buildings. Work performed
pursuant to such terms and conditions shall not be considered a capital project or a
state public works project as defined in Section 13-1-91 NMSA 1978 nor shall it be
subject to the requirements of Section 13-1-150 NMSA 1978, review by the staff
architect of the facilities management division of the general services department or
regulation by the director of that division pursuant to Section 15-3B-6 NMSA 1978.

    G. Any contract entered into by the corrections department with a private contractor
to operate an existing facility shall include a provision securing the right of all persons
employed by that facility prior to the effective date of that contract to be employed by
that contractor in any position for which they qualify before that position is offered to any
person not employed by that facility prior to that date.

History: Laws 1985, ch. 149, § 1; 1988, ch. 79, § 1; 1990, ch. 51, § 2; 1995, ch. 215, §
3; 2013, ch. 115, § 23.

                                      ANNOTATIONS
The 2013 amendment, effective June 14, 2013, changed the name of the property
control division of the general services department to the facilities management division;
in Subsection F, deleted "property control" and added "facilities management" before
"division", and in the second sentence, after "considered a capital project", deleted "as
defined in Section 15-3-23.3 NMSA 1978", after "Section 13-1-150 NMSA 1978",
deleted "or of the Capital Program Act", and after "general services department",
deleted "pursuant to Section 15-3-20 NMSA 1978".

The 1995 amendment, effective June 16, 1995, rewrote Subsection B which read "The
corrections department may contract for the construction of a private facility to house a
special incarceration alternative program for adult male and adult female felony
offenders with a person or entity in the business of providing correctional or jail services
to government entities"; added Subsection C; redesignated former Subsections C
through F as Subsections D through G; in Subsection D, substituted "or operation" for
"and operation" near the end of Paragraphs (2) and (3) and inserted "availability or"
near the end of Paragraph (4); substituted "a facility for which private contractor
operation is authorized" for "the facility" in Subsection E; and substituted "public works
project" for "capital project" in Subsection F.

The 1990 amendment, effective May 16, 1990, added present Subsection B;
designated former Subsection A, beginning with the second sentence, as Subsection C;
redesignated former Subsections B to D as present Subsections D to F; substituted
"any contract under this section" for "the contract in" near the beginning of present
Subsection C; and substituted "this section" for "Section 33-1-17 NMSA 1978" in the
first sentence of present Subsection E.

This section does not require individual officer compliance with training
requirements in order for the independent contractor employee to be considered a
peace officer. State v. Young, 2004-NMSC-015, 135 N.M. 458, 90 P.3d 477.

Employee of corrections contractor not "public employee". — The employee of an
independent corrections contractor is not a "public employee" immune from tort liability
under the New Mexico Tort Claims Act, 41-4-1 NMSA 1978 et seq. Giron v. Corr. Corp.
of Am., 14 F. Supp. 2d 1245 (D.N.M. 1998).

Law reviews. — For note and comment, "The Constitutionality of Faith-Based Prison
Programs: A Real World Analysis Based in New Mexico," see 37 N.M. L. Rev. 487
(2007).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2022 · leading case: Spurlock v. Wagner, 661 F. App'x 536 (10th Cir. 2016).
Spurlock v. Wagner, 661 F. App'x 536 (10th Cir. 2016). · cites it 4× “These appeals and cross-appeals ensued, and raised five issues: (1) whether Defendants *538 must pay the judgment against Officer Townes under N.M. Stat. Ann. § 33-1-17 ; (2) whether the special verdict form properly allowed for Plaintiffs’ comparative fault to be assessed; (3)…”
Pena v. Greffet, 922 F. Supp. 2d 1187 (D.N.M. 2013). · cites it 3× “Section 33-1-17 of the New Mexico Statutes Annotated, which allows for corrections facilities to be owned and operated by private contractors, provides that a private contractor’s "employees performing the functions of correctional officers shall be deemed correctional officers…”
Giron v. Corr. Corp. of Am., 191 F.3d 1281 (10th Cir. 1999). “Torrez (count IV); (5) negligence on the part of CCA and Warden Newton for failing to institute appropriate safeguards against the sexual assault of female inmates by prison employees (count V), and (6) statutory liability on the part of CCA pursuant to N.M. Stat. Ann. § 33-1-17…”
Spurlock v. Townes, 2016 NMSC 014 (N.M. 2016). · cites it 2× “NMSA 1978, § 33-1-17(D)(2) (2013). II. DISCUSSION {13} “Under basic respondeat superior principles, an employer is liable for an employee’s torts committed within the scope of his or her employment.”
Corr. Corp. of Am. of Tennessee, Inc. v. State, 2007 NMCA 148 (N.M. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “THE GRANTS FACILITY {3} In 1988, CCA and NMCD entered into a “Management Services Agreement,” pursuant to NMSA 1978, § 33-1-17 (1995), the statute that allowed the state to contract with the private prison industry to provide prisons and correctional services for the state of…”
Ferrell v. Allstate Ins., 2007 NMCA 017 (N.M. Ct. App. 2006). “Code § 33-1-17 (West, Westlaw through 2006 Sess.”
Spurlock v. Townes, 594 F. App'x 463 (10th Cir. 2014). “We decline to certify Plaintiffs’ first proposed question— concerning whether the judgment entered against Officer Townes constitutes a "liability” imputed to CCA under New Mexico’s mandatory financial responsibility statute for private correctional facilities, N.M. Stat. Ann. §…”
Ferrell v. Allstate Ins. Co., 150 P.3d 1022 (N.M. Ct. App. 2007). “Code § 33-1-17 (West, Westlaw through 2006 Sess.”
Spurlock v. Townes, 2016 NMSC 14 (N.M. 2016). · cites it 2× “NMSA 1978, § 33-1-17(D)(2) (2013). II. DISCUSSION {13} “Under basic respondeat superior principles, an employer is liable for an employee’s torts committed within the scope of his or her employment.”
Hunnicutt, Sr. v. Tafoya-Lucero (D.N.M. 2022). · cites it 2× “NMSA § 33-1-17(B) expressly authorizes NMCD to enter into contracts relating to the operation of correctional facilities.”
Campbell v. Williams (10th Cir. 2000). “” Thus, he believes the Lea County contract to provide such services violates N.M. Stat. Ann. § 33-1-17 (B) and also infringes upon his rights under the First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution.”
— N.M. Stat. § 33-1-17(B) — 1 case
Hunnicutt, Sr. v. Tafoya-Lucero (D.N.M. 2022). “NMSA § 33-1-17(B) expressly authorizes NMCD to enter into contracts relating to the operation of correctional facilities.”
— N.M. Stat. § 33-1-17(D)(2) — 2 cases
Spurlock v. Townes, 2016 NMSC 014 (N.M. 2016). “NMSA 1978, § 33-1-17(D)(2) (2013). II. DISCUSSION {13} “Under basic respondeat superior principles, an employer is liable for an employee’s torts committed within the scope of his or her employment.”
Spurlock v. Townes, 2016 NMSC 14 (N.M. 2016). “NMSA 1978, § 33-1-17(D)(2) (2013). II. DISCUSSION {13} “Under basic respondeat superior principles, an employer is liable for an employee’s torts committed within the scope of his or her employment.”
— N.M. Stat. § 33-1-17(E) — 1 case
Pena v. Greffet, 922 F. Supp. 2d 1187 (D.N.M. 2013). “Section 33-1-17 of the New Mexico Statutes Annotated, which allows for corrections facilities to be owned and operated by private contractors, provides that a private contractor’s "employees performing the functions of correctional officers shall be deemed correctional officers…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.