New Mexico Statutes
N.M. Stat. § 45-5B-201 (2026)
Authority that requires specific grant; grant of general
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NM-LEGnmonesource.com
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
authority.
A. An agent under a power of attorney may do the following on behalf of the
principal or with the principal's property only if the power of attorney expressly grants
the agent the authority and exercise of the authority is not otherwise prohibited by
another agreement or instrument to which the authority or property is subject:
(1) create, amend, revoke or terminate an inter vivos trust;
(2) make a gift;
(3) create or change rights of survivorship;
(4) create or change a beneficiary designation;
(5) delegate authority granted under the power of attorney;
(6) waive the principal's right to be a beneficiary of a joint and survivor
annuity, including a survivor benefit under a retirement plan;
(7) exercise fiduciary powers that the principal has authority to delegate; or
(8) disclaim property, including a power of appointment.
B. Notwithstanding a grant of authority to do an act described in Subsection A of
this section, unless the power of attorney otherwise provides, an agent that is not an
ancestor, spouse or descendant of the principal shall not exercise authority under a
power of attorney to create in the agent, or in an individual to whom the agent owes a
legal obligation of support, an interest in the principal's property, whether by gift, right of
survivorship, beneficiary designation, disclaimer or otherwise.
C. Subject to Subsections A, B, D and E of this section, if a power of attorney grants
to an agent authority to do all acts that a principal could do, the agent has the general
authority described in Sections 204 through 216 [45-5B-204 to 45-5B-216 NMSA 1978]
of the Uniform Power of Attorney Act.
D. Unless the power of attorney otherwise provides, a grant of authority to make a
gift is subject to the provisions of Section 217 [45-5B-217 NMSA 1978] of the Uniform
Power of Attorney Act.
E. Subject to Subsections A, B and D of this section, if the subjects over which
authority is granted in a power of attorney are similar or overlap, the broadest authority
controls.
F. Authority granted in a power of attorney is exercisable with respect to property
that the principal has when the power of attorney is executed or acquires later, whether
or not the property is located in this state and whether or not the authority is exercised
or the power of attorney is executed in this state.
G. An act performed by an agent pursuant to a power of attorney has the same
effect and inures to the benefit of and binds the principal and the principal's successors
in interest as if the principal had performed the act.
History: Laws 2007, ch. 135, § 201; 1978 Comp., § 46B-1-201 recompiled as § 45-5B-
201 by Laws 2011, ch. 124, § 102.
ANNOTATIONS
Recompilations. — Laws 2011, ch. 124, § 102 recompiled former 46B-1-201 NMSA
1978 as 45-5B-201 NMSA 1978, effective January 1, 2012.Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2018–2023 · leading case: Braswell v. Whitefeather (N.M. Ct. App. 2023).
Braswell v. Whitefeather (N.M. Ct. App. 2023). “” See NMSA 1978, § 45-5B-201(A)(2) (2011). Plaintiff argued that the conveyance constituted a gift because Sanchez had not received consideration.”
Campbell v. Lieb (N.M. Ct. App. 2018). “Section 45-5B-201(G) (“An act performed by an agent pursuant to a power 18 of attorney has the same effect and inures to the benefit of and binds the principal and 19 the principal’s successors in interest as if the principal had performed the act.”
N.M. Stat. § 45-5B-201(A)(2): 1 case
Braswell v. Whitefeather (N.M. Ct. App. 2023). “” See NMSA 1978, § 45-5B-201(A)(2) (2011). Plaintiff argued that the conveyance constituted a gift because Sanchez had not received consideration.”
N.M. Stat. § 45-5B-201(A)(3): 1 case
Braswell v. Whitefeather (N.M. Ct. App. 2023). “” See NMSA 1978, § 45-5B-201(A)(2) (2011). Plaintiff argued that the conveyance constituted a gift because Sanchez had not received consideration.”
N.M. Stat. § 45-5B-201(A)(4): 1 case
Braswell v. Whitefeather (N.M. Ct. App. 2023). “” See NMSA 1978, § 45-5B-201(A)(2) (2011). Plaintiff argued that the conveyance constituted a gift because Sanchez had not received consideration.”
N.M. Stat. § 45-5B-201(G): 1 case
Campbell v. Lieb (N.M. Ct. App. 2018). “Section 45-5B-201(G) (“An act performed by an agent pursuant to a power 18 of attorney has the same effect and inures to the benefit of and binds the principal and 19 the principal’s successors in interest as if the principal had performed the act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.