New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 46-5-1 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

History: 1953 Comp., § 33-7-1, enacted by Laws 1965, ch. 26, § 1; repealed by Laws 1993, ch. 174, § 84.

ANNOTATIONS

Repeals. — Laws 1993, ch. 174, § 84 repealed 46-5-1 NMSA 1978, as enacted by Laws 1965, ch. 26, § 1, relating to the short title of the act, effective July 1, 1993. For provisions of former sections, see the 1992 NMSA 1978 on NMOneSource.com.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1960–1977 · leading case: Runyan v. Jaramillo, 567 P.2d 478 (N.M. 1977).
Runyan v. Jaramillo, 567 P.2d 478 (N.M. 1977). · cites it 2× “applied for a non-quota rural liquor dispensing license in accordance with §§ 46-5-1 to 28, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Supp.1975).”
Sw. Distrib. Co. v. Olympia Brewing Co., 565 P.2d 1019 (N.M. 1977). · cites it 2× “§ 46-5-1 et seq., N.M.S.A. 1953; § 46-9-1 et seq.”
Safeway Stores, Inc. v. City of Las Cruces, 484 P.2d 341 (N.M. 1971). · cites it 6× “If a hearing was contemplated what, I ask, were the issues to be resolved? Not the qualifications of the transferee or the propriety of the proposed location.”
Norvell v. Sangre De Cristo Dev. Co., Inc., 372 F. Supp. 348 (D.N.M. 1974). · cites it 3× “iled herein *359 its Memorandum Opinion finding the issues in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants; Now, Therefore, It is adjudged and decreed that the following statutes are applicable to the defendant Sangre de Cristo Development Company, Incorporated, in its…”
State Ex Rel. Dickson v. Kearns, 348 P.2d 1002 (N.M. 1960). · cites it 2× “The statute provides what must be done to obtain a license generally (§ 46-5-1 N.M.S. A.1953) or a dispenser’s license (§ 46-5-2 N.”
City of Santa Rosa v. Jaramillo, 517 P.2d 69 (N.M. 1973). “As stated in § 46-5-1, N.M. S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 7, 1966): “ * * * [T]he sale of all alcoholic liquors in the state of New Mexico shall be licensed, regulated and controlled so as to protect the public health, safety and morals of every community in this state; * * *.”
Cantrell v. Curnutt, 458 P.2d 594 (N.M. 1969). “Appellant further urges that the transfer by her to the partnership was void as being in violation of § 46-5-1, N.M.S.A. 1953. The argument is answered by Valley Country Club, Inc.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.