New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 46A-6-602 (2026)

Revocation or amendment of revocable trust

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. Unless the terms of a trust expressly provide that the trust is irrevocable, the settlor may revoke or amend the trust. This subsection does not apply to a trust created under an instrument executed before July 1, 2003.

B. If a revocable trust is created or funded by more than one settlor:

(1) to the extent the trust consists of community property, the trust may be revoked by either spouse acting alone but may be amended only by joint action of both spouses;

(2) to the extent the trust consists of property other than community property, each settlor may revoke or amend the trust with regard to the portion of the trust property attributable to that settlor's contribution; and (3) upon the revocation or amendment of the trust by fewer than all of the settlors, the trustee shall promptly notify the other settlors of the revocation or amendment.

C. The settlor may revoke or amend a revocable trust:

(1) by substantial compliance with a method provided in the terms of the trust; or

(2) if the terms of the trust do not provide a method or the method provided in the terms is not expressly made exclusive, by:

(a) a later will or codicil that expressly refers to the trust or specifically devises property that would otherwise have passed according to the terms of the trust; or

(b) any other method manifesting clear and convincing evidence of the settlor's intent.

D. Upon revocation of a revocable trust, the trustee shall deliver the trust property as the settlor directs.

E. A settlor's powers with respect to revocation, amendment or distribution of trust property may be exercised by an agent under a power of attorney only to the extent expressly authorized by the terms of the trust or the power.

F. A conservator of the settlor or, if no conservator has been appointed, a guardian of the settlor may exercise a settlor's powers with respect to revocation, amendment or distribution of trust property only with the approval of the court supervising the conservatorship or guardianship.

G. A trustee who does not know that a trust has been revoked or amended is not liable to the settlor or settlor's successors in interest for distributions made and other actions taken on the assumption that the trust had not been amended or revoked.

History: Laws 2003, ch. 122, § 6-602; 2007, ch. 128, § 16.

ANNOTATIONS

The 2007 amendment, effective July 1, 2007, added Paragraph (3) of Subsection B.

Method of revocation. — Mere filing and service of a divorce petition do not constitute "clear and convincing evidence" of a settlor’s intent to revoke a trust. Less formal methods of trust revocation are usually insufficient means to revoke a trust, "because they provide less reliable indicia of intent" than those methods outlined in either the terms of the trust or in the statutory language of the Uniform Trust Code. Oldham v. Oldham, 2011-NMSC-007, 149 N.M. 215, 247 P.3d 736. Power of surviving spouse to amend community property trust. — Where husband and wife entered into a community property trust which reserved to the grantors the power to amend or revoke the trust by an instrument signed by the grantors and delivered in grantors’ lifetimes to the trustee; the trust provided that the terms of the trust were to be liberally construed in favor of the surviving spouse’s interests and above the interests of the other beneficiaries, that upon the death of one grantor, the surviving grantor had the unrestricted right to take any and all of the trust assets upon demand, that the surviving grantor had the right to redirect the distribution of the trust remainder in the surviving grantor’s last will and testament, and that words used in the plural included the singular; and the attorney who drafted the trust stated that the trust was drafted to confer upon the surviving spouse the power to amend the trust after the death of one spouse, the trust granted to the surviving spouse the power to amend the trust after the death of the other spouse. Cable v. Wells Fargo Bank N.M., N.A., 2010- NMSC-017, 148 N.M. 127, 231 P.3d 108, aff'g on different grounds, 2008-NMCA-005, 143 N.M. 269, 175 P.3d 937.

Amendment by surviving grantor. — Where a trust is silent on amendment after the death of one of the grantors and provides that the surviving grantor has the unrestricted right to withdraw all assets from the trust estate, the power to amend the trust is implied. Cable v. Wells Fargo Bank N.M., N.A., 2008-NMCA-005, 143 N.M. 269, 175 P.3d 937, aff'd, 2010-NMSC-017, 148 N.M. 127, 231 P.3d 10.

Revocation of a trust by a will. — Where the decedent, during the decedent’s lifetime, established a revocable trust which provided that in the event of the death of the decedent’s spouse prior to the complete distribution of the spouse’s share, the spouses’ share would be distributed to the spouse’s relative; Section 5.1 of the trust agreement provided that the decedent reserved the right during the decedent’s lifetime to revoke the trust by an instrument signed by the decedent and delivered to the trustees; Section 5.1 did not expressly state that the requirements of Section 5.1 were the exclusive means by which the trust could be revoked; the spouse died one day before the decedent died; the decedent’s will expressly referred to the trust and provided that the will revoked the trust and that the decedent’s spouse’s share of the trust passed onto the decedent’s estate to be distributed as provided in the decedent’s will, the trust was effectively revoked by the decedent’s will. Schlicht v. Olguin, 2014-NMCA-074.

Law reviews. — For article, "The New Mexico Uniform Trust Code," see 34 N.M.L. Rev. 1 (2004).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2007–2024 · leading case: Oldham v. Oldham, 247 P.3d 736 (N.M. 2011).
Oldham v. Oldham, 247 P.3d 736 (N.M. 2011). · cites it 13× “See § 46A-6-602. A settlor can revoke or amend a revocable trust by complying with a method of revocation “provided in the terms of the trust.”
In Re Cable Fam. Trust June 10, 1987, 231 P.3d 108 (N.M. 2010). · cites it 4× “] Section 46A-6-602(B). The Restatement of the Law of Trusts bolsters the UTC's restriction on community property trust amendments.”
Cable v. Wells Fargo Bank New Mexico, N.A., 2010 NMSC 017 (N.M. 2010). · cites it 4× “] Section 46A-6-602(B). The Restatement of the Law of Trusts bolsters the UTC’s restriction on community property trust amendments.”
Est. of Schlicht v. Olguin, 2014 NMCA 074 (N.M. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 16× “NMSA 1978, Section 46A-6-602(C) (2007) was central to the issue before the court.”
Cordova v. Cordova (N.M. Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 14× “{9} Because Section 46A-6-602(C)(2)(a) allowed Decedent to revoke the Trust with her Will so long as she expressly referred to the Trust in her Will, and she did just that, 3Plaintiffs alternatively argue that it was error for the court to grant the directed verdict because…”
Cable v. Wells Fargo Bank New Mexico, N.A., 175 P.3d 937 (N.M. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “2d 918, 919-20 (1975) (holding that husband could not unilaterally amend trust without wife’s consent while wife was alive, even though the trust agreement contained both a clause permitting the grantors to amend, and a clause stating that the singular was deemed to include the…”
Schlicht v. Olguin, 2014 NMCA 74 (N.M. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 12× “{6} After a hearing in October 2012 on the supplemental briefing, the district court (Judge James Lawrence Sanchez) granted Olguin’s motion in a November 26, 2012, order.”
N.M. Stat. § 46A-6-602(B): 2 cases
In Re Cable Fam. Trust June 10, 1987, 231 P.3d 108 (N.M. 2010). “] Section 46A-6-602(B). The Restatement of the Law of Trusts bolsters the UTC's restriction on community property trust amendments.”
Cable v. Wells Fargo Bank New Mexico, N.A., 2010 NMSC 017 (N.M. 2010). “] Section 46A-6-602(B). The Restatement of the Law of Trusts bolsters the UTC’s restriction on community property trust amendments.”
N.M. Stat. § 46A-6-602(B)(1): 1 case
In Re Cable Fam. Trust June 10, 1987, 231 P.3d 108 (N.M. 2010). “] Section 46A-6-602(B). The Restatement of the Law of Trusts bolsters the UTC's restriction on community property trust amendments.”
N.M. Stat. § 46A-6-602(B)(l): 2 cases
Cable v. Wells Fargo Bank New Mexico, N.A., 2010 NMSC 017 (N.M. 2010). “] Section 46A-6-602(B). The Restatement of the Law of Trusts bolsters the UTC’s restriction on community property trust amendments.”
Cable v. Wells Fargo Bank New Mexico, N.A., 175 P.3d 937 (N.M. Ct. App. 2007). “2d 918, 919-20 (1975) (holding that husband could not unilaterally amend trust without wife’s consent while wife was alive, even though the trust agreement contained both a clause permitting the grantors to amend, and a clause stating that the singular was deemed to include the…”
N.M. Stat. § 46A-6-602(C): 2 cases
Est. of Schlicht v. Olguin, 2014 NMCA 074 (N.M. Ct. App. 2014). “NMSA 1978, Section 46A-6-602(C) (2007) was central to the issue before the court.”
Schlicht v. Olguin, 2014 NMCA 74 (N.M. Ct. App. 2014). “{6} After a hearing in October 2012 on the supplemental briefing, the district court (Judge James Lawrence Sanchez) granted Olguin’s motion in a November 26, 2012, order.”
N.M. Stat. § 46A-6-602(C)(1): 2 cases
Cordova v. Cordova (N.M. Ct. App. 2024). “{9} Because Section 46A-6-602(C)(2)(a) allowed Decedent to revoke the Trust with her Will so long as she expressly referred to the Trust in her Will, and she did just that, 3Plaintiffs alternatively argue that it was error for the court to grant the directed verdict because…”
Schlicht v. Olguin, 2014 NMCA 74 (N.M. Ct. App. 2014). “{6} After a hearing in October 2012 on the supplemental briefing, the district court (Judge James Lawrence Sanchez) granted Olguin’s motion in a November 26, 2012, order.”
N.M. Stat. § 46A-6-602(C)(2): 4 cases
Oldham v. Oldham, 247 P.3d 736 (N.M. 2011). “See § 46A-6-602. A settlor can revoke or amend a revocable trust by complying with a method of revocation “provided in the terms of the trust.”
Est. of Schlicht v. Olguin, 2014 NMCA 074 (N.M. Ct. App. 2014). “NMSA 1978, Section 46A-6-602(C) (2007) was central to the issue before the court.”
Cordova v. Cordova (N.M. Ct. App. 2024). “{9} Because Section 46A-6-602(C)(2)(a) allowed Decedent to revoke the Trust with her Will so long as she expressly referred to the Trust in her Will, and she did just that, 3Plaintiffs alternatively argue that it was error for the court to grant the directed verdict because…”
Schlicht v. Olguin, 2014 NMCA 74 (N.M. Ct. App. 2014). “{6} After a hearing in October 2012 on the supplemental briefing, the district court (Judge James Lawrence Sanchez) granted Olguin’s motion in a November 26, 2012, order.”
N.M. Stat. § 46A-6-602(C)(2)(a): 4 cases
Oldham v. Oldham, 247 P.3d 736 (N.M. 2011). “See § 46A-6-602. A settlor can revoke or amend a revocable trust by complying with a method of revocation “provided in the terms of the trust.”
Est. of Schlicht v. Olguin, 2014 NMCA 074 (N.M. Ct. App. 2014). “NMSA 1978, Section 46A-6-602(C) (2007) was central to the issue before the court.”
Cordova v. Cordova (N.M. Ct. App. 2024). “{9} Because Section 46A-6-602(C)(2)(a) allowed Decedent to revoke the Trust with her Will so long as she expressly referred to the Trust in her Will, and she did just that, 3Plaintiffs alternatively argue that it was error for the court to grant the directed verdict because…”
Schlicht v. Olguin, 2014 NMCA 74 (N.M. Ct. App. 2014). “{6} After a hearing in October 2012 on the supplemental briefing, the district court (Judge James Lawrence Sanchez) granted Olguin’s motion in a November 26, 2012, order.”
N.M. Stat. § 46A-6-602(C)(2)(b): 1 case
Oldham v. Oldham, 247 P.3d 736 (N.M. 2011). “See § 46A-6-602. A settlor can revoke or amend a revocable trust by complying with a method of revocation “provided in the terms of the trust.”
N.M. Stat. § 46A-6-602(C)(l): 2 cases
Oldham v. Oldham, 247 P.3d 736 (N.M. 2011). “See § 46A-6-602. A settlor can revoke or amend a revocable trust by complying with a method of revocation “provided in the terms of the trust.”
Est. of Schlicht v. Olguin, 2014 NMCA 074 (N.M. Ct. App. 2014). “NMSA 1978, Section 46A-6-602(C) (2007) was central to the issue before the court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.