N.M. Stat. » Chapter 57 — Trade Practices and Regulations
New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 57-14-1 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This act [57-14-1 to 57-14-9 NMSA 1978] may be cited as the "Price Discrimination Act".

History: 1953 Comp., § 49-11-1, enacted by Laws 1961, ch. 229, § 1.

ANNOTATIONS

Cross references. — For restraints of trade generally, see 57-1-1 NMSA 1978 et seq.

Act parallels federal act. — The Price Discrimination Act (57-14-1 to 57-14-9) adopted by the New Mexico legislature, except for its provision permitting damages, closely parallels the Robinson-Patman Act, adopted by congress as an amendment to the Clayton Anti-Trust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13 (1976). Jay Walton Enters., Inc. v. Rio Grande Oil Co., 1987-NMCA-070, 106 N.M. 55, 738 P.2d 927, cert. denied, 106 N.M. 7, 738 P.2d 125.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1987–2011 · leading case: Coll v. First Am. Title Ins., 642 F.3d 876 (10th Cir. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Coll v. First Am. Title Ins., 642 F.3d 876 (10th Cir. 2011). “Plaintiffs failed to state claims against the Insurer Defendants under the New Mexico Price Discrimination Act Plaintiffs mention the New Mexico Price Discrimination Act (“PDA”), N.M. Stat. §§ 57-14-1 through 57-14-9, only in the prayers for relief included in their complaints,…”
Jay Walton Enter., Inc. v. Rio Grande Oil Co., 738 P.2d 927 (N.M. Ct. App. 1987). “Thereafter, plaintiff filed suit against defendants, alleging that defendants’ actions constituted a violation of the New Mexico Price Discrimination Act, NMSA 1978, Sections 57-14-1 to -9, and had forced plaintiff out of business.”
Michelson v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, 669 F. Supp. 1244 (S.D.N.Y. 1987). “The 1985 decision dismissed both claims as to Merrill Lynch on res judicata grounds to the extent they relate to Merrill Lynch's handling of Michelson's account.”
Michelson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 669 F. Supp. 1244 (S.D.N.Y. 1987). “The 1985 decision dismissed both claims as to Merrill Lynch on res judicata grounds to the extent they relate to Merrill Lynch’s handling of Michelson’s account.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.