New Mexico Statutes
N.M. Stat. § 61-11-1 (2026)
Short title.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NM-LEGnmonesource.com
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Chapter 61, Article 11 NMSA 1978 may be cited as the "Pharmacy Act".
History: 1953 Comp., § 67-9-33, enacted by Laws 1969, ch. 29, § 1; 1997, ch. 131, § 1.
ANNOTATIONS
The 1997 amendment, effective June 20, 1997, substituted "Chapter 61, Article 11
NMSA 1978" for "This act".
Am. Jur. 2d, A.L.R. and C.J.S. references. — Liability of pharmacist who accurately
fills prescription for harm resulting to user, 44 A.L.R.5th 393.Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2017–2021 · leading case: Oakey v. May Maple Pharmacy, Inc., 2017 NMCA 54 (N.M. Ct. App. 2017).
Oakey v. May Maple Pharmacy, Inc., 2017 NMCA 54 (N.M. Ct. App. 2017). “He concluded that the Pharmacy breached the “[s]tandard of [c]are of the [p]rofession of [p]harmacy” and violated the New Mexico Pharmacy Practice Act, NMSA 1978, § 61-11-1 (1997); 16.19.20.41 NMAC; and the federal and state Controlled Substances Acts, 21 U.”
N.M. Boys & Girls Ranch v. N.M. Bd. of Pharmacy, 2022 NMCA 047 (N.M. Ct. App. 2021). “{1} The New Mexico Board of Pharmacy (the Board) appeals the district court’s permanent injunction prohibiting it from enforcing the Pharmacy Act (the Act), NMSA 1978, §§ 61-11-1 to -29 (1969, as amended through 2021)1 and 16.”
Oakey v. May Maple Pharmacy, Inc. (N.M. Ct. App. 2017). “He concluded that the Pharmacy breached the 8 “[s]tandard of [c]are of the [p]rofession of [p]harmacy” and violated the New Mexico 9 Pharmacy Practice Act, NMSA 1978, § 61-11-1 (1997); 16.19.20.41 NMAC; and the 10 federal and state Controlled Substances Acts, 21 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.