N.M. Stat. » Chapter 66 — Motor Vehicles
New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 66-5-28 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

History: 1953 Comp., § 64-5-28, enacted by Laws 1978, ch. 35, § 250; 1979, ch. 71, § 4; 1989, ch. 14, § 21; repealed by Laws 2009, ch. 200, § 8.

ANNOTATIONS

Repeals. — Laws 2009, ch. 200, § 8 repealed 66-5-28 NMSA 1978, as enacted by Laws 1978, ch. 35, § 250, relating to requirement that the court forward revoked drivers' licenses to the division and definitions of "convicted" and "conviction", effective July 1, 2009. For provisions of former section, see the 2008 NMSA 1978 on NMOneSource.com.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1994–1995 · leading case: Town of Bernalillo v. Garcia, 884 P.2d 501 (N.M. Ct. App. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Town of Bernalillo v. Garcia, 884 P.2d 501 (N.M. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “Both NMSA 1978, Section 66-5-28(B) (Repl.Pamp.1989), and SCRA 8-703(D) prohibit revocation based on a conviction that is under appeal; and a first DWI offense cannot be the basis for automatic revocation anyway, unless the person convicted does not attend DWI school, see NMSA…”
Collyer v. State of New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Dep't, 913 P.2d 665 (N.M. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “The DA has Statutory Authority to Bind all State Agencies Foreseeably Affected by the Plea Agreement.”
N.M. Stat. § 66-5-28(A): 1 case
Collyer v. State of New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Dep't, 913 P.2d 665 (N.M. Ct. App. 1995). “The DA has Statutory Authority to Bind all State Agencies Foreseeably Affected by the Plea Agreement.”
N.M. Stat. § 66-5-28(B): 1 case
Town of Bernalillo v. Garcia, 884 P.2d 501 (N.M. Ct. App. 1994). “Both NMSA 1978, Section 66-5-28(B) (Repl.Pamp.1989), and SCRA 8-703(D) prohibit revocation based on a conviction that is under appeal; and a first DWI offense cannot be the basis for automatic revocation anyway, unless the person convicted does not attend DWI school, see NMSA…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.