N.M. Stat. » N.M. Stat. / Chapter 8 / Article 2
New Mexico Statutes

N.M. Stat. § 8-2-2 (2026)

Governor-elect; office space and equipment.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NM-LEGnmonesource.com JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar 
Whenever the governor-elect is a different individual than the incumbent governor,
the legislative council shall upon his certification of election provide suitable office space
in the legislative building and furniture and equipment for the temporary use of the
governor-elect and his staff until the inauguration.

History: 1953 Comp., § 4-28-2, enacted by Laws 1967, ch. 116, § 2.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1957–1982 · leading case: Apodaca v. Tome Land & Improvement Co., 577 P.2d 1237 (N.M. 1978).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Apodaca v. Tome Land & Improvement Co., 577 P.2d 1237 (N.M. 1978). · cites it 4× “Section 8-2-2, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.1974) enumerates seven powers which incorporated community land grants possess.”
Davis v. Westland Dev. Co. Ex Rel. Town of Atrisco, 466 P.2d 862 (N.M. 1970). · cites it 4× “By its Point II appellant quotes a portion of § 8-2-2, N.M.S.A., 1953 Comp., as follows: “Provided, however, that no sale of the lands held in common can be made to persons who are non-heirs of the grant unless a majority of such heirs present at a mass meeting to be called…”
Cebolleta Land Grant, Ex Rel. Bd. of Trs. of the Cebolleta Land Grant v. Romero, 644 P.2d 515 (N.M. 1982). “Apodaca involved construction of § 8-2-2, N.M.S.A.1953 [now § 49-2-2(B), N.”
Westland Dev. Co. v. Saavedra, 459 P.2d 141 (N.M. 1969). “This “equity” could have been diminished by sale, mortgage, or otherwise under § 8-2-2, N.M.S.A.1953, by the trustees upon approval of a majority of the heirs present at a mass meeting.”
Armijo v. Town of Atrisco, 312 P.2d 91 (N.M. 1957). “§ 8-2-2, among other things, provides: “ * * * To sell, convey, lease, mortgage or otherwise dispose of so much of the land of the grant under their management and control as is held in common by the owners and proprietors.”
Herrera v. Town of Atrisco, 412 P.2d 253 (N.M. 1966). “However, in his absence, this cannot be. Another point raised by defendant on this appeal has to do with the validity of the lease, it being claimed that it was executed in violation of § 8-2-2, N.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.