New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Banking Law § 641 (2026)
License
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 641. License. 1. No person shall engage in the business of selling or issuing checks, or engage in the business of receiving money for transmission or transmitting the same, without a license therefor obtained from the superintendent as provided in this article, nor shall any person engage in such business as an agent, except as an agent of a licensee or as agent of a payee; provided, however, that nothing in this article shall apply to a bank, trust company, private banker, foreign banking corporation licensed pursuant to article two of this chapter or foreign banking company authorized to operate pursuant to the International Banking Act of 1978 (12 USC 3101 et seq.), as amended, savings bank, savings and loan association, an investment company, a national banking association, federal reserve bank, corporation organized under the provisions of section twenty-five-a of an act of congress entitled the "Federal Reserve Act", federal savings bank, federal savings and loan association or state or federal credit union. 2. Application for a license required under this article shall be in writing, under oath, and in the form prescribed by the superintendent, and shall contain the following: (a) The exact name of the applicant and, if incorporated, the date of incorporation and the state where incorporated. (b) The complete address of the principal office from which the business is to be conducted, and where the books and records of the applicant are maintained and to be maintained, showing the street and number, if any, and the municipality and county; (c) If the applicant has one or more branches, subsidiaries or affiliates engaging in this state in the business of selling or issuing checks, or of receiving money for transmission or transmitting the same, the complete name and address of each; (d) The name and residence address of the applicant, if an individual or, if a partnership, of its partners or, if a corporation or association, of the directors, trustees and principal officers thereof, and of any stockholder owning twenty per centum or more of any class of its stock; and (e) Such other pertinent information as the superintendent may require. 3. Application for a license shall be accompanied by an investigation fee as prescribed pursuant to section eighteen-a of this chapter, which shall not be refunded.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1999–2014 · leading case: United States v. Mazza-Alaluf, 607 F. Supp. 2d 484 (S.D.N.Y. 2009).
United States v. Mazza-Alaluf, 607 F. Supp. 2d 484 (S.D.N.Y. 2009). “N.Y. Banking Law § 641 (1) (McKinney 2008).”
Tupi Cambios S.A. v. Morgenthau, 48 A.D.3d 278 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008). “d Aníbal Contreras, the principal of Beacon Hill, under CPLR article 13-A, seeking the forfeiture of funds in their possession or control on the ground that the funds were instrumentalities of criminal activity, to wit, Beacon Hill’s and Contreras’ violation of certain…”
Tupi Cambios, S.A. v. Morgenthau, 44 Misc. 3d 800 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2014). “Defendant, in his official capacity and by his subordinates, prosecuted BHSC and Contreras for transmission of money in New York without the appropriate license in violation of Banking Law §§ 641 and 650. Ultimately, the indictment initiating the prosecution was dismissed…”
Slemish Corp. v. Morgenthau, 63 A.D.3d 418 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009). “Beacon Hill subsequently pleaded guilty to violations of Banking Law §§ 641 and 650 (2) (b) (1) and entered into a stipulation providing, among other things, for forfeiture, pursuant to CPLR article 13A, of most of the funds in its own and its clients’ Chase accounts, including…”
United States v. Velastegui, 56 F. Supp. 2d 313 (S.D.N.Y. 1999). “” N.Y. Banking Law § 641 . The law permits a licensee to conduct its business “through or by means of such agents and subagents as the licensee may from time to time designate or appoint.”
United States v. Ali, 561 F. Supp. 2d 269 (E.D.N.Y 2008). “” N.Y. Banking Law § 641 (McKinney 1999). The indictment charged each defendant with one count of operating or aiding and abetting another in the operation of an unlicensed money transmitting business and another of conspiracy to operate such a business.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.