New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Education Law § 3813 (2026)
Presentation of claims against the governing body of any school district or certain state supported schools
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 3813. Presentation of claims against the governing body of any school district or certain state supported schools. 1. No action or special proceeding, for any cause whatever, except as hereinafter provided, relating to district property or property of schools provided for in article eighty-five of this chapter or chapter ten hundred sixty of the laws of nineteen hundred seventy-four or claim against the district or any such school, or involving the rights or interests of any district or any such school shall be prosecuted or maintained against any school district, board of education, board of cooperative educational services, school provided for in article eighty-five of this chapter or chapter ten hundred sixty of the laws of nineteen hundred seventy-four or any officer of a school district, board of education, board of cooperative educational services, or school provided for in article eighty-five of this chapter or chapter ten hundred sixty of the laws of nineteen hundred seventy-four unless it shall appear by and as an allegation in the complaint or necessary moving papers that a written verified claim upon which such action or special proceeding is founded was presented to the governing body of said district or school within three months after the accrual of such claim, and that the officer or body having the power to adjust or pay said claim has neglected or refused to make an adjustment or payment thereof for thirty days after such presentment. In the case of an action or special proceeding for monies due arising out of contract, accrual of such claim shall be deemed to have occurred as of the date payment for the amount claimed was denied. 2. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary hereinbefore contained in this section, no action or special proceeding founded upon tort shall be prosecuted or maintained against any of the parties named in this section or against any teacher or member of the supervisory or administrative staff or employee where the alleged tort was committed by such teacher or member or employee acting in the discharge of his duties within the scope of his employment and/or under the direction of the board of education, trustee or trustees, or governing body of the school unless a notice of claim shall have been made and served in compliance with section fifty-e of the general municipal law. Every such action shall be commenced pursuant to the provisions of section fifty-i of the general municipal law; provided, however, that this section shall not apply to: (i) any claim to recover damages for physical, psychological, or other injury or condition suffered as a result of conduct which would constitute a sexual offense as defined in article one hundred thirty of the penal law committed against a child less than eighteen years of age, incest as defined in section 255.27, 255.26 or 255.25 of the penal law committed against a child less than eighteen years of age, or the use of a child in a sexual performance as defined in section 263.05 of the penal law committed against a child less than eighteen years of age; or (ii) any civil claim or cause of action revived pursuant to section two hundred fourteen-j of the civil practice law and rules. 2-a. Upon application, the court, in its discretion, may extend the time to serve a notice of claim. The extension shall not exceed the time limited for the commencement of an action by the claimant against any district or any such school. In determining whether to grant the extension, the court shall consider, in particular, whether the district or school or its attorney or its insurance carrier or other agent acquired actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim within the time specified in subdivision one of this section or within a reasonable time thereafter. The court shall also consider all other relevant facts and circumstances, including: whether the claimant was an infant, or mentally or physically incapacitated, or died before the time limited for service of the notice of claim; whether the claimant failed to serve a timely notice of claim by reason of his justifiable reliance upon settlement representations made by an authorized representative of the district or school or its insurance carrier; whether the claimant in serving a notice of claim made an excusable error concerning the identity of the district or school against which the claim should be asserted; and whether the delay in serving the notice of claim substantially prejudiced the district or school in maintaining its defense on the merits. An application for leave to serve a late notice shall not be denied on the ground that it was made after commencement of an action against the district or school. Nothing contained in this subdivision shall affect claims arising out of contracts entered into by the parties before the effective date of this subdivision; nor shall anything contained in this subdivision affect non-contractual claims which have accrued before the effective date of this subdivision. 2-b. Except as provided in subdivision two of this section and, notwithstanding any other provision of law providing a longer period of time in which to commence an action or special proceeding, no action or special proceeding shall be commenced against any entity specified in subdivision one of this section more than one year after the cause of action arose; provided, however, that nothing contained in this subdivision shall be deemed to modify or supersede any provision of law specifying a shorter period of time in which to commence an action or special proceeding against any such entity. For purposes of this subdivision, a cause of action against the school district of residence for reimbursement of tuition costs incurred pursuant to subdivision four of section thirty-two hundred two of this chapter by the school district in which a family home at board is located shall arise as of the date payment for the amount claimed was denied. 3. The provisions of this section shall not supersede, alter or affect the provisions of section twenty-five hundred twelve of this chapter. 4. In any action for personal injuries by a passenger on a school bus against a school district, school bus operator under contract with a school district, or any agent or employee of a district or operator (including, but not limited to, bus drivers, matrons, teachers serving as chaperones and volunteers) no such person shall be held liable solely because the injured party was not wearing a seat safety belt; provided, however, that nothing contained herein shall be construed to grant immunity from liability for failure to: (a) maintain in operating order any equipment required by statute, rule or regulation; (b) comply with applicable statutes, rules or regulations.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 659
cases (116 in the last 5 years), 1980–2026 · leading case: Carlson v. Geneva City Sch. Dist., 679 F. Supp. 2d 355 (W.D.N.Y. 2010).
Carlson v. Geneva City Sch. Dist., 679 F. Supp. 2d 355 (W.D.N.Y. 2010). “Defendants’ motion contends the following: 1) all of Plaintiffs state-law claims must be dismissed, because Plaintiff did not comply with New York General Municipal Law §§ 50-e and 50 — i or New York Education Law § 3813; 2) the state-law claims are barred by the one-year…”
Amorosi v. S Colonie Sch Dist., 880 N.E.2d 6 (N.Y. 2007). “We conclude that the clear and unambiguous language of Education Law § 3813 (2-b) provides that the statute of limitations on such a claim is one year.”
Newcomb v. Middle Country Cent. Sch. Dist., 68 N.E.3d 714 (N.Y. 2016). “The late notice of claim in this case was also brought pursuant to Education Law § 3813 (2-a), which contains a provision equivalent to section 50-e (5), and applies to “any school district, board of education, [and] board of cooperative educational services” (Education Law §…”
Felice v. Eastport/South Manor Cent. Sch. Dist., 50 A.D.3d 138 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008). “(District No. 3) was misplaced. II A timely notice of claim must be served upon a school district before an injured person may commence a tort action against the district (see Education Law § 3813 [2]; General Municipal Law § 50-i [1]; Matter of Padovano v Massapequa Union Free…”
Amorosi v. South Colonie Indep. Cent. Sch. Dist., 880 N.E.2d 6 (N.Y. 2007). “We conclude that the clear and unambiguous language of Education Law § 3813 (2-b) provides that the statute of limitations on such a claim is one year.”
Laface v. E. Suffolk Boces, 349 F. Supp. 3d 126 (E.D.N.Y 2018). “unless it shall appear by and as an allegation in the complaint ... a written verified claim upon which such action or special proceeding is founded was presented to the governing body of said district or school within three months after the accrual of such claim.”
Pratt ex rel. Petranchuk v. Indian River Cent. Sch. Dist., 803 F. Supp. 2d 135 (N.D.N.Y. 2011). “Whether Plaintiffs Were Required to File a Notice of Claim Prior to Commencing this Action in Federal Court Defendants argue that, under New York law, before commencing an action against a school district in this Court, a plaintiff must comply with the Notice of Claim…”
Caputo v. Copiague Union Free Sch. Dist., 218 F. Supp. 3d 186 (E.D.N.Y 2016). “N.Y. Educ. Law § 3813 (2). New York General Municipal Law 50-e, which is referenced in § 3813, requires that a plaintiff must file a notice of claim prior to commencement of a tort action against a municipality, and must serve the notice of claim within ninety (90) days after…”
Yennard v. Herkimer Boces, 241 F. Supp. 3d 346 (N.D.N.Y. 2017). “at 15-16); (5) her state-law claims should not be dismissed based on her failure to serve Defendants with a notice of claim because she has commenced a collateral proceeding in New York State Supreme Court, Herkimer County, seeking leave to file and serve a late notice of claim…”
McClancy v. Plainedge Union Free Sch. Dist., 2017 NY Slip Op 6651 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017). “, 148 AD3d at 910 ; see Education Law § 3813 [2]). “The purpose of the statutory notice of claim requirement is to afford the public corporation an adequate opportunity to investigate the circumstances surrounding the accident and to explore the merits of the claim while…”
Kushner v. Valenti, 285 F. Supp. 2d 314 (E.D.N.Y 2003). “According to defendants, Education Law § 3813(1), which requires a notice of claim to be served on the “governing body” of a school district within three months of the accrual of the claim, see N.Y. Educ. Law § 3813 (1) (McKinney’s 2001), applies to Kushner’s state law…”
Sotomayor v. City of New York, 862 F. Supp. 2d 226 (E.D.N.Y 2012). “Law § 3813 (2-b) (“[N]o action or special proceeding shall be commenced against any [school, school district, board of education, or an ‘officer of a school district, board of education, board of cooperative educational services, or school provided for in article eighty-five of…”
N.Y. Education Law § 3813(1): 42 cases
Carlson v. Geneva City Sch. Dist., 679 F. Supp. 2d 355 (W.D.N.Y. 2010). “Defendants’ motion contends the following: 1) all of Plaintiffs state-law claims must be dismissed, because Plaintiff did not comply with New York General Municipal Law §§ 50-e and 50 — i or New York Education Law § 3813; 2) the state-law claims are barred by the one-year…”
Avgerinos v. Palmyra-Macedon Cent. Sch. Dist., 690 F. Supp. 2d 115 (W.D.N.Y. 2010).
Kushner v. Valenti, 285 F. Supp. 2d 314 (E.D.N.Y 2003). “According to defendants, Education Law § 3813(1), which requires a notice of claim to be served on the “governing body” of a school district within three months of the accrual of the claim, see N.Y. Educ. Law § 3813 (1) (McKinney’s 2001), applies to Kushner’s state law…”
Benedith v. Malverne Union Free Sch. Dist., 38 F. Supp. 3d 286 (E.D.N.Y 2014).
Johnson v. Cnty. of Nassau, 82 F. Supp. 3d 533 (E.D.N.Y 2015).
N.Y. Education Law § 3813(2): 10 cases
Carlson v. Geneva City Sch. Dist., 679 F. Supp. 2d 355 (W.D.N.Y. 2010). “Defendants’ motion contends the following: 1) all of Plaintiffs state-law claims must be dismissed, because Plaintiff did not comply with New York General Municipal Law §§ 50-e and 50 — i or New York Education Law § 3813; 2) the state-law claims are barred by the one-year…”
Benedith v. Malverne Union Free Sch. Dist., 38 F. Supp. 3d 286 (E.D.N.Y 2014).
Caputo v. Copiague Union Free Sch. Dist., 218 F. Supp. 3d 186 (E.D.N.Y 2016). “N.Y. Educ. Law § 3813 (2). New York General Municipal Law 50-e, which is referenced in § 3813, requires that a plaintiff must file a notice of claim prior to commencement of a tort action against a municipality, and must serve the notice of claim within ninety (90) days after…”
Dortz v. City of New York, 904 F. Supp. 127 (S.D.N.Y. 1995).
Avgerinos v. Palmyra-Macedon Cent. Sch. Dist., 690 F. Supp. 2d 115 (W.D.N.Y. 2010).
N.Y. Education Law § 3813(4): 1 case
Cheeseboro v. Little Richie Bus Serv., Inc., 254 F. Supp. 3d 485 (E.D.N.Y 2017).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.