New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Education Law § 6506 (2026)
Supervision by the board of regents
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 6506. Supervision by the board of regents. The board of regents shall supervise the admission to and the practice of the professions. In supervising, the board of regents may: (1) Promulgate rules, except that no rule shall be promulgated concerning article 131-A of this chapter; (2) Establish by rule, high school, preprofessional, professional and other educational qualifications required for licensing in the professions regulated by this title; (3) Charter schools offering educational programs for the professions regulated by this title, and no such school shall operate in this state without such a charter, except Columbia University, any school chartered by special act of the legislature prior to September one, nineteen hundred seventy-one, and schools specifically authorized to conduct such programs by the regents; (4) Appoint such committees as it deems necessary and compensate members of such committees who are not members of the board of regents or the department up to one hundred dollars per day for each day devoted to committee functions, together with their necessary expenses; (5) Waive education, experience and examination requirements for a professional license prescribed in the article relating to the profession, provided the board of regents shall be satisfied that the requirements of such article have been substantially met; (6) Indorse a license issued by a licensing board of another state or country upon the applicant fulfilling the following requirements: (a) Application: file an application with the department; (b) Education: meet educational requirements in accordance with the commissioner's regulations; (c) Experience: have experience satisfactory to the board and in accordance with the commissioner's regulations; (d) Examination: pass an examination satisfactory to the board and in accordance with the commissioner's regulations; (e) Age: be at least twenty-one years of age; (f) Citizenship or immigration status: be a United States citizen or a noncitizen lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States; (g) Character: be of good moral character as determined by the department; and (h) Prior professional conduct: where an application is submitted for licensure endorsement in any profession regulated by this title and the board of regents determines that while engaged in practice in another jurisdiction the applicant: (i) has been subject to disciplinary action by a duly authorized professional disciplinary agency of such other jurisdiction, where the conduct upon which the disciplinary action was based would, if committed in New York state, constitute practicing the profession beyond its authorized scope, with gross incompetence, with gross negligence on a particular occasion, or with negligence or incompetence on more than one occasion under the laws of New York state, or (ii) has voluntarily or otherwise surrendered his or her professional license in another jurisdiction after a disciplinary action was instituted by a duly authorized professional disciplinary agency of such other jurisdiction, based on conduct that would, if committed in New York state, constitute practicing the profession beyond its authorized scope, with gross incompetence, with gross negligence on a particular occasion, or with negligence or incompetence on more than one occasion under the laws of New York state, the board of regents shall evaluate the conduct and may deny licensure endorsement to the applicant based on such conduct; (7) Direct the department to remedy any error, omission, delay or other circumstance in the issuance or registration of a license; (8) Designate a professional conduct officer, who shall be the chief administrative officer of the office of the professions, or his designee, in connection with professional licensing and misconduct proceedings and criminal matters, such officer to be empowered to issue subpoenas and administer oaths in connection with such proceedings; (9) Establish by rule, standards of conduct with respect to advertising, fee splitting, practicing under a name other than that of the individual licensee (when not specifically authorized), proper use of academic or professional degrees or titles tending to imply professional status, and such other ethical practices as such board shall deem necessary, except that no rule shall be established concerning article 131-A of this chapter; and (10) Delegate to department officers the disposition of any licensing matters pursuant to rules.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1975–2025 · leading case: Brokamp v. James, 66 F.4th 374 (2d Cir. 2023).
Brokamp v. James, 66 F.4th 374 (2d Cir. 2023). “See N.Y. Educ. Law § 6506 (6) (granting Board of Regents authority to endorse licenses issued by other states); N.”
Charlebois v. J.M. Weller Assocs., Inc., 531 N.E.2d 1288 (NY 1988). “Engineering and architecture are indisputably among the learned professions which are closely regulated by the State Board of Regents and the State Department of Education (Education Law §§6506, 6507, 6508, 7205, 7303).”
Matter of Hammonds v. New York State Educ. Dept., 2022 NY Slip Op 03959 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022). “8 [c]), or that he was entitled to a waiver based upon having substantially met the examination requirement ( see Education Law § 6506 [5]; 8 NYCRR 24.7 [a] [1]).”
Jaghory v. New York State Dep't of Educ., 131 F.3d 326 (2d Cir. 1997). “New York law grants the Board power to “[wjaive education, experience and examination requirements for a professional license prescribed in the article relating to the profession, provided the board of regents shall be satisfied that the requirements of such article have been…”
Matter of Am. Univ. of Antigua v. CGFNS Int'l, 126 A.D.3d 1146 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015). “In 2010, graduates of petitioners’ nursing school applied to respondent State Education Department and respondent Commissioner of Education (hereinafter collectively referred to as SED) to verify their educational credentials and to take the National Council licensing exam in…”
Karasik v. Bd. of Regents, 130 A.D.2d 923 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987). “In its answer to the petition in this case, respondent notes that if an applicant does not specifically meet the requirements of Education Law § 7603, respondent is entitled to waive the specific requirements if it is satisfied that they have been substantially met (see,…”
In re Doe, 97 F.R.D. 640 (S.D.N.Y. 1982). “N.Y. Educ.Law § 6506 (McKinney’s 1972 & Supp.”
New York State Chiropractic Ass'n v. New York State Bd. of Regents, 120 A.D.2d 177 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986). “It is beyond cavil that the Regents and the Education Department, through the Regents, are vested with the ultimate authority to supervise and administer the admission into and practice of the professions (Education Law § 6504), and that this authority includes the power to…”
New York Pub. Interest Rsch. Grp., Inc. v. Regents of the Univ. of the State of New York, 516 F.2d 350 (2d Cir. 1975). “shall include but shall not be limited to the following: (c) advertising of fixed fees or prices for professional services or the use of words ‘cut rate’, ‘discount’ or other words having a similar connotation in connection with the offering of professional services by a…”
Tomanio v. The Bd. Of Regents Of The Univ. Of The State Of New York, 603 F.2d 255 (2d Cir. 1979). “" Education Law Section 6506, subdivision 5.”
Stone v. Sobol, 171 A.D.2d 235 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991). “The Board of Regents is empowered to supervise the practice of medicine by physicians (see, Education Law § 6506), which includes the power to determine if a physician is guilty of professional misconduct (see, Education Law § 6509) and, if so, mete out appropriate punishment.”
Matter of Winkler v. New York State Educ. Dept. Off. of Prof'l Discipline, 2025 NY Slip Op 02982 (N.Y. App. Div. 2025). “Accordingly, inasmuch as it is undisputed that respondents are otherwise authorized by statute to conduct an investigation and hold these disciplinary proceedings ( see Education Law §§ 6506 [8]; 6507 [4] [h]; 6508 [3]; 6510), Supreme Court correctly determined that the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.