New York Consolidated Laws

N.Y. Education Law § 6509 (2026)

Definitions of professional misconduct

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NY-LEGnysenate.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 6509. Definitions of professional misconduct. Each of the following
is professional misconduct, and any licensee found guilty of such
misconduct under the procedures prescribed in section sixty-five hundred
ten shall be subject to the penalties prescribed in section sixty-five
hundred eleven:
  (1) Obtaining the license fraudulently,
  (2) Practicing the profession fraudulently, beyond its authorized
scope, with gross incompetence, with gross negligence on a particular
occasion or negligence or incompetence on more than one occasion,
  (3) Practicing the profession while the ability to practice is
impaired by alcohol, drugs, physical disability, or mental disability,
  (4) Being habitually drunk or being dependent on, or a habitual user
of narcotics, barbiturates, amphetamines, hallucinogens, or other drugs
having similar effects,
  (5) (a) Being convicted of committing an act constituting a crime
under:
  (i) New York State law or,
  (ii) Federal law or,
  (iii) The law of another jurisdiction and which, if committed within
this state, would have constituted a crime under New York State law;
  (b) Having been found guilty of improper professional practice or
professional misconduct by a duly authorized professional disciplinary
agency of another state where the conduct upon which the finding was
based would, if committed in New York state, constitute professional
misconduct under the laws of New York state;
  (c) Having been found by the commissioner of health to be in violation
of article thirty-three of the public health law.
  (d) Having his license to practice medicine revoked, suspended or
having other disciplinary action taken, or having his application for a
license refused, revoked or suspended or having voluntarily or otherwise
surrendered his license after a disciplinary action was instituted by a
duly authorized professional disciplinary agency of another state, where
the conduct resulting in the revocation, suspension or other
disciplinary action involving the license or refusal, revocation or
suspension of an application for a license or the surrender of the
license would, if committed in New York state, constitute professional
misconduct under the laws of New York state.
  (6) Refusing to provide professional service to a person because of
such person's race, creed, color, or national origin,
  (7) Permitting, aiding or abetting an unlicensed person to perform
activities requiring a license,
  (8) Practicing the profession while the license is suspended, or
wilfully failing to register or notify the department of any change of
name or mailing address, or, if a professional service corporation
wilfully failing to comply with sections fifteen hundred three and
fifteen hundred fourteen of the business corporation law or, if a
university faculty practice corporation wilfully failing to comply with
paragraphs (b), (c) and (d) of section fifteen hundred three and section
fifteen hundred fourteen of the business corporation law,
  (9) Committing unprofessional conduct, as defined by the board of
regents in its rules or by the commissioner in regulations approved by
the board of regents,
  (10) A violation of section twenty-eight hundred three-d or
twenty-eight hundred five-k of the public health law.
  11. A violation of section six thousand five hundred five-b of this
chapter by a professional other than a professional subject to the
provisions of paragraph (f) of subdivision one of section twenty-eight
hundred five-k of the public health law.
  (12) In the event that the department of environmental conservation
has reported to the department alleged misconduct by an architect or
professional engineer in making a certification under section nineteen
of the tax law (relating to the green building tax credit) the board of
regents, upon a hearing and a finding of willful misconduct, may revoke
the license of such professional or prescribe such other penalty as it
determines to be appropriate.
  (13) In the event that any agency designated pursuant to title four-B
of article four of the real property tax law (relating to the green roof
tax abatement) has reported to the department alleged misconduct by an
architect or engineer in making a certification under such title, the
board of regents, upon a hearing and a finding of willful misconduct,
may revoke the license of such professional or prescribe such other
penalty as it determines to be appropriate.
  (14) In the event that any agency designated pursuant to title four-C
of article four of the real property tax law (relating to the solar
electric generating system tax abatement) has reported to the department
alleged misconduct by an architect or engineer in making a certification
under such title, the board of regents, upon a hearing and a finding of
willful misconduct, may revoke the license of such professional or
prescribe such other penalty as it determines to be appropriate.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 161 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1980–2025 · leading case: Block v. Ambach, 537 N.E.2d 181 (N.Y. 1989).
Block v. Ambach, 537 N.E.2d 181 (N.Y. 1989). · cites it 11× “In October 1984, based on complaints made by the former patient, petitioner was charged by the Office of Professional Discipline of the Education Department with professional misconduct in violation of Education Law § 6509 (9) and 8 NYCRR 29.1 (b) (5) for having had a sexual…”
Klein v. Sobol, 167 A.D.2d 625 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990). · cites it 10× “(hereinafter collectively referred to as the corporations), with various specifications of professional misconduct (see, Education Law § 6509 [2], [9]; 8 NYCRR 29.”
Yong-Myun Rho v. Ambach, 546 N.E.2d 188 (N.Y. 1989). · cites it 3× “In 1985, the State Board of Professional Medical Conduct charged petitioner, who had been licensed to practice medicine in New York since 1970, with professional misconduct under *320 Education Law § 6509 (2). 1 The Board alleged that petitioner, a Deputy Chief Medical Examiner…”
Chase Sci. Rsch., Inc. v. Nia Grp., Inc., 749 N.E.2d 161 (N.Y. 2001). “, 22 NYCRR part 603 [attorney discipline]; Education Law §§ 6509, 6510, 6511 [professional misconduct, proceedings and discipline for accountants, architects, engineers and others, but not insurance agents or brokers]).”
Brokamp v. James, 66 F.4th 374 (2d Cir. 2023). “676, § 7, N.Y. Educ. Law §§ 6509–6511, as well as to various materials included in the licensure legislation’s Bill Jacket.”
Kirschner v. Mills, 274 A.D.2d 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000). · cites it 4× “*787 Petitioner, licensed, as a dentist in New York since 1961, was served in July 1996 with a notice of hearing and an August 1995 statement of charges by the Office of Professional Discipline of the Education Department (hereinafter OPD) charging him with four specifications…”
Ackerman v. Ambach, 142 A.D.2d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988). · cites it 3× “In November 1978, the State Board for Professional Medical Conduct charged petitioner with practicing his profession fraudulently, with gross negligence and/or gross incompetence, with negligence and/or incompetence on more than one occasion in violation of Education Law § 6509…”
Spero v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ., 158 A.D.2d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990). · cites it 3× “Respondent adopted this recommendation and the Commissioner of Education entered an appropriate order.”
Morfesis v. Sobol, 172 A.D.2d 897 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991). · cites it 2× “Petitioner, a licensed physician, was charged with practicing the profession negligently and/or incompetently on more than one occasion and with gross negligence and/or gross incompetence (Education Law § 6509 [2]) as to patients designated A through E.”
Laverne v. Sobol, 149 A.D.2d 758 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989). · cites it 2× “In April 1979 a disciplinary proceeding was commenced against petitioner, a physician duly licensed to practice medicine in New York, charging him with practicing the profession of medicine fraudulently and with unprofessional conduct within the meaning of Education Law § 6509…”
Charlebois v. J.M. Weller Assocs., Inc., 531 N.E.2d 1288 (N.Y. 1988). “Although, as recognized by the majority (majority opn, at 592), a licensee may be disciplined by the State Board of Regents if found guilty of professional misconduct, this statutory protection, though important, is triggered only by carefully delineated and egregious forms of…”
Brestin v. Comm'r of Educ., 116 A.D.2d 357 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986). · cites it 2× “As a result, charges of professional misconduct were filed against petitioner, alleging that he had practiced the profession fraudulently (see, Education Law § 6509 [2]) and that he committed professional misconduct as defined by regulation in willfully making or filing false…”
N.Y. Education Law § 6509(5)(a): 1 case
Foreman v. Ambach, 525 F. Supp. 722 (S.D.N.Y. 1981).
N.Y. Education Law § 6509(9): 3 cases
McGrane v. Reader's Digest Ass'n, Inc., 822 F. Supp. 1044 (S.D.N.Y. 1993).
Damino v. O'NEILL, 702 F. Supp. 949 (E.D.N.Y 1987).
Damino v. Barrell, 702 F. Supp. 954 (E.D.N.Y 1988).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.