New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. General Business Law § 870 (2026)
Legislative intent
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 870. Legislative intent. The legislature finds and declares that there exists an unreasonable risk of injury and death associated with the sale of toy weapons which are replica of and cannot be easily distinguished from actual weapons; that in recent years the sale and possession of these imitation weapons has grown; that in nineteen hundred eighty-seven, more than fourteen hundred toy imitation weapons involved in criminal incidents were confiscated by the police in New York city alone, nearly eighty percent more than four years earlier; that when such imitation weapons are perceived as actual weapons fear and dangerous defensive actions often result. The legislature further finds and declares that the purpose of this article is to safeguard the public from the unreasonable risk of death and injury that may result when imitation weapons are perceived as real, by banning the importation, manufacture, distribution and sale of such imitation weapons.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1994–2003 · leading case: Citizens for a Safer Cmty. v. City of Rochester, 164 Misc. 2d 822 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1994).
Citizens for a Safer Cmty. v. City of Rochester, 164 Misc. 2d 822 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1994). “On the other hand, the court does find that 15 USC § 5001 (g) (i) and (ii) relating to air and spring guns and General Business Law § 870 et seq., establish an intent to fully regulate at the State and Federal level the manufacture, sale and possession of air guns, spring guns,…”
People v. Gift & Luggage Outlet, Inc., 194 Misc. 2d 582 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2003). “First and foremost is that the Legislature has wisely concluded that the sale of toy weapons represents a serious threat to public health and safety and has expressed its intent in General Business Law § 870: “The legislature finds and declares that there exists an unreasonable…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.