New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Judiciary Law § 478 (2026)
Practicing or appearing as attorney-at-law without being admitted and registered
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 478. Practicing or appearing as attorney-at-law without being admitted and registered. It shall be unlawful for any natural person to practice or appear as an attorney-at-law or as an attorney and counselor-at-law for a person other than himself or herself in a court of record in this state, or to furnish attorneys or counsel or an attorney and counsel to render legal services, or to hold himself or herself out to the public as being entitled to practice law as aforesaid, or in any other manner, or to assume to be an attorney or counselor-at-law, or to assume, use, or advertise the title of lawyer, or attorney and counselor-at-law, or attorney-at-law or counselor-at-law, or attorney, or counselor, or attorney and counselor, or equivalent terms in any language, in such manner as to convey the impression that he or she is a legal practitioner of law or in any manner to advertise that he or she either alone or together with any other persons or person has, owns, conducts or maintains a law office or law and collection office, or office of any kind for the practice of law, without having first been duly and regularly licensed and admitted to practice law in the courts of record of this state, and without having taken the constitutional oath. Provided, however, that nothing in this section shall be held to apply (1) to officers of societies for the prevention of cruelty to animals, duly appointed, when exercising the special powers conferred upon such corporations under section fourteen hundred three of the not-for-profit corporation law; or (2) to law students who have completed at least two semesters of law school or persons who have graduated from a law school, who have taken the examination for admittance to practice law in the courts of record in the state immediately available after graduation from law school, or the examination immediately available after being notified by the board of law examiners that they failed to pass said exam, and who have not been notified by the board of law examiners that they have failed to pass two such examinations, acting under the supervision of a legal aid organization when such students and persons are acting under a program approved by the appellate division of the supreme court of the department in which the principal office of such organization is located and specifying the extent to which such students and persons may engage in activities otherwise prohibited by this statute; or (3) to law students who have completed at least two semesters of law school, or to persons who have graduated from a law school approved pursuant to the rules of the court of appeals for the admission of attorneys and counselors-at-law and who have taken the examination for admission to practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law immediately available after graduation from law school or the examination immediately available after being notified by the board of law examiners that they failed to pass said exam, and who have not been notified by the board of law examiners that they have failed to pass two such examinations, when such students or persons are acting under the supervision of the state or a subdivision thereof or of any officer or agency of the state or a subdivision thereof, pursuant to a program approved by the appellate division of the supreme court of the department within which such activities are taking place and specifying the extent to which they may engage in activities otherwise prohibited by this statute and those powers of the supervising governmental entity or officer in connection with which they may engage in such activities; or (4) an attorney and counselor-at-law or the equivalent who is admitted to the bar in another state, territory, district or foreign country and who has been admitted to practice pro hac vice in the state of New York within the limitations prescribed in the rules of the court of appeals; or (5) an attorney licensed as a legal consultant under rules adopted by the court of appeals pursuant to subdivision six of section fifty-three of this chapter and rendering legal services in the state within limitations prescribed in such rules.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 117
cases (30 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case: El Gemayel v. Seaman, 533 N.E.2d 245 (N.Y. 1988).
El Gemayel v. Seaman, 533 N.E.2d 245 (N.Y. 1988). “dant did not contract with plaintiff as Mary was his client; that enforcement of any contract between the defendant and plaintiff was barred by the Statute of Frauds as there was no signed writing evidencing defendant’s intent to answer for the debt of another (General…”
People v. Carter, 566 N.E.2d 119 (N.Y. 1990). “If there remains any doubt on the subject, it should be dispelled by the special exemptions in Judiciary Law §§478 and 484 for law students or recent law graduates who are "acting under the supervision of the state or a subdivision thereof or of any officer or agency of the…”
Discover Bank v. Gilliam, 2021 NY Slip Op 05949 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021). “ranting the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the complaint; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Orange County, to provide the defendant with an opportunity to serve and file an answer,…”
People v. Romero, 698 N.E.2d 424 (N.Y. 1998). “The Attorney-General presented the matter to the Grand Jury on November 30, 1995, which that same day indicted defendant on one count of each of three charges: offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree (a charge that was dismissed before trial); unauthorized…”
People v. Adekoya, 50 Misc. 3d 99 (N.Y. App. Term. 2015). “Defendant was charged with, and pleaded guilty to, practicing or appearing as an attorney-at-law without being admitted and registered (Judiciary Law § 478). The factual portion of the accusatory instrument alleged that defendant had appeared in New York State Supreme Court…”
Matter of Sharon B., 530 N.E.2d 832 (N.Y. 1988). “Both sections, however, specifically except "officers of societies for the prevention of cruelty, duly appointed, when exercising the special powers conferred upon such corporations under section fourteen hundred three of the not-for-profit corporation law”.”
Benjamin v. Koeppel, 650 N.E.2d 829 (N.Y. 1995). “In this State, a person is authorized to practice law if that person has been admitted to practice and has taken the requisite oath (see, Judiciary Law § 478; see also, §§ 466, 476-a [1] [b]).”
Matter of Barry, 2021 NY Slip Op 05916 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021). “Noting that language, we emphasize that a suspended attorney's continuing use of any medium that conveys that he or she is an attorney in good standing is improper ( see Judiciary Law § 478; Rules for Attorney Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.”
Gabayzadeh v. Taylor, 639 F. Supp. 2d 298 (E.D.N.Y 2009). “2d 579, 579 (2d Dep’t 1988)); see also N.Y. Judiciary Law §§ 478 , 484. “[A]ppearance pro se denotes (in law [L]atin) the appearance for one’s self; so that a person ordinarily may not appear pro se in the cause of another person or entity.”
People v. Jacobs, 844 N.E.2d 1126 (N.Y. 2005). “Shamis later pleaded guilty to the crime of practicing or appearing as an attorney-at-law without being admitted and registered (see Judiciary Law §§ 478, 485). . Nevertheless, in People v Kieser ( 79 NY2d 936, 937 [1992]), we explained that “not every defect in an individual’s…”
Doscher v. Mannatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, 2017 NY Slip Op 1973 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017). “Plaintiff also failed to state a cause of action under Judiciary Law § 478, because the statute does not apply to attorney misconduct during an arbitral proceeding.”
People v. Williams, 137 A.D.3d 1709 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016). “30), and two counts of practicing or appearing as an attorney-at-law without being admitted and registered (Judiciary Law § 478). The convictions arose from defendant filing two notices of retainer and appearance with the New York State Workers’ Compensation Board.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.