New York Consolidated Laws

N.Y. Judiciary Law § 773 (2026)

Amount of fine

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NY-LEGnysenate.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 773. Amount of fine. If an actual loss or injury has been caused to
a party to an action or special proceeding, by reason of the misconduct
proved against the offender, and the case is not one where it is
specially prescribed by law, that an action may be maintained to recover
damages for the loss or injury, a fine, sufficient to indemnify the
aggrieved party, must be imposed upon the offender, and collected, and
paid over to the aggrieved party, under the direction of the court. The
payment and acceptance of such a fine constitute a bar to an action by
the aggrieved party, to recover damages for the loss or injury.
  Where it is not shown that such an actual loss or injury has been
caused, a fine may be imposed, not exceeding the amount of the
complainant's costs and expenses, and two hundred and fifty dollars in
addition thereto, and must be collected and paid, in like manner. A
corporation may be fined as prescribed in this section.
  If a fine is imposed to punish an offense committed with respect to an
enforcement procedure under the civil practice law and rules or pursuant
to section two hundred forty-five of the domestic relations law, and it
has not been shown that such an actual loss or injury has been caused
and the defendant has not appeared upon the return of the application,
the order imposing fine, if any, shall include a provision granting the
offender leave to purge himself of the contempt within ten days after
personal service of the order by appearing and satisfying the court that
he is unable to pay the fine or, in the discretion of the court, by
giving an undertaking in a sum to be fixed by the court conditioned upon
payment of the fine plus costs and expenses and his appearance and
performance of the act or duty, the omission of which constitutes the
misconduct for which he is to be punished. The order may also include a
provision committing the offender to prison until the fine plus costs
and expenses are paid, or until he is discharged according to law. Upon
a certified copy of the order imposing fine, together with proof by
affidavit that more than ten days have elapsed since personal service
thereof upon the offender, and that the fine plus costs and expenses has
not been paid, the court may issue without notice a warrant directed to
the sheriff or other enforcement officer of any jurisdiction in which
the offender may be found. The warrant shall command such officer to
arrest the offender forthwith and bring him before the court, or a judge
thereof, to be committed or for such other disposition as the court in
its discretion shall direct.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 182 cases (34 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case: Dep't of Hous. Pres. & Dev. v. Deka Realty Corp., 208 A.D.2d 37 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995).
Dep't of Hous. Pres. & Dev. v. Deka Realty Corp., 208 A.D.2d 37 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995). · cites it 4× “HPD contends that, pursuant to the consent decree, a fine of $13,250 should be imposed for civil contempt which amount represents the maximum statutory fine of $250 (see, Judiciary Law § 773) multiplied by the 53 violations, and a fine of $53,000 should be imposed for criminal…”
Town Bd. of Town of Southampton v. R.K.B. Realty, LLC, 91 A.D.3d 628 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012). · cites it 4× “Judiciary Law § 773 distinguishes between the amount of the fine assessable in two separate types of civil contempt proceedings: “one where actual damage has resulted from the defendants’ contemptuous acts and one where there may be prejudice to a complainant’s rights but it is…”
Ahmad v. Naviwala, 306 A.D.2d 588 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003). · cites it 3× “On March 17, 2003, respondent moved to dismiss that part of petitioner’s appeal which contended that Family Court failed to hold a hearing to determine respondent’s liability under Judiciary Law § 773. By decision and order entered April 7, 2003, this Court withheld…”
Gottlieb v. Gottlieb, 137 A.D.3d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016). · cites it 2× “Legal fees that constitute actual loss or injury as a result of a contempt are routinely awarded as part of the fine (Judiciary Law § 773, see Bell v White , 112 AD3d 1104 [3d Dept 2013], lv dismissed 23 NY3d 984 [2014]).”
Ahmad v. Naviwala, 14 A.D.3d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005). · cites it 6× “Although both parties conceded that Family Court conducted a posttrial counsel fee hearing in March 2003, we found no proof that it also considered petitioner’s request, made pursuant to Judiciary Law § 773, for the expenses she incurred prior to the institution of those…”
Matter of Gonnard v. Guido, 141 A.D.3d 649 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016). · cites it 3× “Thereafter, the mother moved pursuant to Judiciary Law § 773 for an award of attorney’s fees and expenses in the sum of $58,828, consisting of sums incurred with regard to the Family Court proceedings and the father’s appeals.”
Matter of Khan v. Khan, 140 A.D.3d 1252 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016). · cites it 2× “Where, as here, no actual loss or injury was sustained, Judiciary Law § 773 permits that “a fine may be imposed, not exceeding the amount of the complainant’s costs *1255 and expenses, and [$250] in addition thereto” (see Family Ct Act § 156).”
Gabrelian v. Gabrelian, 108 A.D.2d 445 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985). · cites it 2× “Where a party is adjudged to be in civil contempt, a fine sufficient to indemnify the aggrieved party for the loss or injury occasioned by the contempt may be imposed or, where such actual loss or injury is not shown, a fine not exceeding the amount of plaintiff’s actual…”
Hinkson v. Daughtry-Hinkson, 31 A.D.3d 608 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006). · cites it 3× “Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof awarding the defendant damages in the sum of $52,632; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the…”
Cruz v. TD Bank, N.A., 2 N.E.3d 221 (NY 2013). “be good law, any right to bring a plenary action in the Aspen context arises from the fact that the legislature has declared this type of noncompliance with a restraining notice to constitute contempt (see CPLR 5222 [a]; 5251); the dictum is consistent with the general…”
Ortega v. City of New York, 876 N.E.2d 1189 (NY 2007). “Under our civil contempt statutory scheme, a party who suffers a loss or injury as a result of violation of a court order can seek full compensation from the contemnor (see Judiciary Law § 773; State of New York v Unique Ideas, 44 NY2d 345 [1978]).”
Cassarino v. Cassarino, 2017 NY Slip Op 2623 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017). “Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, to determine the extent of the plaintiffs financial losses caused by the defendant’s contempt and to impose an appropriate fine (see Judiciary Law § 773). The plaintiff’s remaining contention, regarding the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.