N.Y. Laws » CHAPTER Labor / ARTICLE New York State Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act
New York Consolidated Laws

N.Y. Labor Law § 860 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NY-LEGnysenate.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar 
§ 860. Short title. This article shall be known and may be cited as
the "New York state worker adjustment and retraining notification act".
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases (9 in the last 5 years), 2011–2024 · leading case: Roberts v. Genting.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Roberts v. Genting (2d Cir. 2023). · cites it 2× “N.Y. Lab. Law § 860 -b; see also id. § 860-b(2) ("An employer required to give notice .”
Conn v. Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP (In re Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2014). · cites it 2× “N.Y. Lab. L. § 860 , et seq. Thus, the statutory language indicates that to qualify for the Exceptions, the employer must deliver written WARN notice.”
Wenzel v. Partsearch Tech., Inc. (In Re Partsearch Tech., Inc.) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2011). · cites it 2× “16, 2005) (finding that a proposed class consisting of 527 employees who asserted claims under the WARN Act satisfied the commonality requirement of Rule 23 because the named plaintiff and the proposed class had a common legal question whether the defendant employer complied…”
Warshun v. New York Cmty. Bancorp, Inc. (E.D.N.Y 2013). “Similarly, the New York Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (“NY WARN Act”), N.Y. Lab. Law § 860 , et seq. also defines employer as a “business enterprise.”
Thielmann v. MF Global Holdings Ltd. (In re MF Global Holdings Ltd.) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2012). “, and the New York Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (“NY WARN Act”), N.Y. Lab. Law § 860 , et seq., seeking damages for all former employees of the Defendants whose employment was terminated with less advance notice than is required under these statutes.”
In re MF Global Inc. (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2014). “§§ 2101-09 (the “Federal WARN Act”) and the New York Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, N.Y. Lab. Law § 860 , et seq. (the "NY WARN Act”).”
Pinsker v. Borders, Inc. (In re BGI, Inc.) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2012). “§§ 2101-02 ; N.Y. Lab. Law § 860 -b; see also Campbell v.”
Kinney v. Pub. Consulting Grp., Inc. (S.D.N.Y. 2023). · cites it 9× “2 N.Y. Lab. Law § 860 et seq. I. BACKGROUND A.”
Farah v. Emirates (S.D.N.Y. 2024). · cites it 7× “, the New York State Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (“NY WARN”), N.Y. LAB. LAW § 860 et seq., Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1965, 42 U.”
Chain v. Land-Air Express of New England, Ltd. (S.D.N.Y. 2020). · cites it 4× “18, 2015) (citing N.Y. LAB. L. § 860 -a(3)). “The New York WARN Act also contains stricter notice requirements, requiring an employer to give 90 days’ notice before termination, as opposed to 60.”
Ien v. TransCare Corp. (In re TransCare Corp.) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2016). · cites it 2× “§ 2102 (a); N.Y. Lab. Law § 860 -b(l) (McKinney’s 2015).”
Kinney v. Pub. Consulting Grp., Inc. (S.D.N.Y. 2022). · cites it 2× “2 N.Y. Lab. Law § 860 ef seq. 12(d). It further permitted Kinney to respond to Defendants’ arguments and attached exhibits by Friday, December 23, 2022.”
Show all 17 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.