New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Social Services Law § 34 (2026)
General powers and duties of the commissioner
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 34. General powers and duties of the commissioner. 1. The commissioner of social services shall be the chief administrative officer of the department. 2. All the administrative and executive powers and duties of the department shall be vested in the commissioner. 3. The commissioner shall (a) continue to have, exercise, and perform the functions, powers and duties conferred by law upon the commissioner of social services; (b) execute and issue the determinations, decisions, orders, notices, licenses and certificates of the department as may be required in the exercise and performance of the functions, powers and duties conferred upon or vested in the department; (c) take cognizance of the interests of health and welfare of the inhabitants of the state who lack or are threatened with the deprivation of the necessaries of life and of all matters pertaining thereto; (d) exercise general supervision over the work of all local welfare authorities; (e) enforce this chapter and the regulations of the department within the state and in the local governmental units; (f) establish regulations for administration of public assistance and care within the state both by the state itself and by the local governmental units, in accordance with law; (g) provide technical assistance, advisory and consultative services to business, industry and labor to encourage their sponsorship of day care centers; (h) in consultation with the department of education, the department of health, the division for youth, the office for people with developmental disabilities and the office of mental health, establish guidelines for the acceptance by social services officials of notices that children in foster care are at risk of educational placements, as provided for in subparagraph four of paragraph b of subdivision one of section forty-four hundred two of the education law. Such guidelines shall be designed to assure that the social services district receiving such a notice inquire into the educational needs of the child and the circumstances of the foster care placement, and to assure that the social services district responds as appropriate to any request by a committee on special education to participate in the proceedings of the committee; (i) exercise such other powers and perform such other duties as may be required by law. 4. Notwithstanding any inconsistent provision of the civil service law, the commisioner may, if he finds that the chief executive officer of any county or city social services department has failed properly to perform his duties as required by law or rules and regulations of the department, present charges and specifications thereof to the appointing officer or authority of such county or city social services district. Such appointing officer or authority shall, upon receipt of such charges or specifications give notice thereof to the chief executive officer of the social services department and shall make inquiry into the merits of such specifications at a hearing thereon. The commissioner may present his evidence at such hearing and recommend removal or other appropriate sanctions. In the event the appointing authority finds the charges and specifications made by the comissioner are substantiated, the appointing officer or authority shall forthwith remove such chief executive officer or apply other sanctions. Any deputy or other employee of any such officer may also be removed or sanctioned upon the recommendation of the commissioner, in the same manner. Such removal or other sanction may not be appealed to a civil service commission, but may be subject to review pursuant to article seventy-eight of the civil practice law and rules. The provisions of this section shall not be deemed to preclude the exercise of the power of removal or sanction by the officer or authority having the power of appointment. 5. The commissioner or any official by him authorized so to do (a) may conduct any inquiry pertinent or material to the discharge of the duties imposed upon him by law; (b) is empowered to subpoena witnesses, administer oaths, take testimony and compel the production of such books, papers, records and documents as may be relevant to any such investigation. 6. The commissioner may exercise such additional powers and duties as may be required for the effective administration of the department and of the state system of public aid and assistance.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1985–2025 · leading case: Matter of Wittlinger v. Wing, 786 N.E.2d 1270 (NY 2003).
Matter of Wittlinger v. Wing, 786 N.E.2d 1270 (NY 2003). “While, in theory, the State could have signaled its disapproval of the City DSS’s delay by withholding funds from the social services district (see Social Services Law § 20 [3] [e]) or removing or disciplining a local commissioner for *433 dereliction of duty (see Social…”
Thomasel v. Perales, 585 N.E.2d 359 (NY 1991). “In addition, she alleged that the failure of the State DSS to compel the City DSS to pay continued benefits pending her fair hearing violated the duty of the State DSS under State law to supervise and enforce the AFDC program (Social Services Law § 34 [1], [2], [3] [d], [e]).”
Gross v. Perales, 527 N.E.2d 1205 (NY 1988). “From 1981 to 1983, respondent, the New York State Department of Social Services (NYSDSS), audited the City for compliance with the regulations governing the timely termination or reduction of benefits to recipients for the five-year period 1976 to 1980 (see, Social Services Law…”
Matter of Scuderi-Hunter v. Cnty. of Del., 2022 NY Slip Op 01078 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022). “A commissioner is subject to removal or other disciplinary action only for incompetency or misconduct in office following due notice of the charges and a hearing ( see Civil Service Law § 75 [1] [c]; Social Services Law §§ 34 [4]; 116 [2]). The commissioner is "responsible for…”
Goodwin v. Perales, 669 N.E.2d 234 (NY 1996). “Various provisions in the Social Services Law reinforce this by conferring upon DSS the power to establish "rules, regulations and policies to carry out its powers and duties under this chapter” (Social Services Law § 20 [3] [d]) as well as "regulations for [the] administration…”
Chang Il Moon v. New York State Dep't of Soc. Servs., 207 A.D.2d 103 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995). “It follows, therefore, that the authority to issue subpoenas in this case must be determined solely by reference to the specific grant of subpoena power contained in Social Services Law § 34 (5) (b) (see, Matter of Irwin v Board of Regents, supra).”
Benjamin v. McGowan, 275 A.D.2d 290 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000). “” The HRA did not require the production of evidence by the day care center (Social Services Law § 34 [5] [b]) and did not even consult its own records to determine if it had ever confirmed the payment of benefits to petitioner.”
Lamboy v. Gross, 129 Misc. 2d 564 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1985). “The State agency must "supervise all social services work, as the same may be administered by any local unit of government and the social services officials thereof’ (Social Services Law § 20 [2] [b].”
Tsakonas v. Dowling, 227 A.D.2d 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996). “, Matter of Anderson v Bane, supra), petitioner certainly could have requested the ALJ to issue a subpoena pursuant to Social Services Law § 34 (5) (b) and 18 NYCRR 519.”
Mitchell v. Bane, 218 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995). “Respondent has the obligation to supervise the City Agency and the authority "to sanction local districts for failure to comply with State [Department of Social Services] rules ( 42 USC § 602 [a] [3]; Social Services Law § 34 [3] [d]; § 20 [3] [e])” (Matter of Thomasel v…”
Slade v. Koch, 135 Misc. 2d 283 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1987). “Moreover, the Commissioner must "enforce * * * the regulations of the department within the state and in the local governmental units” (Social Services Law § 34 [3] [e]). The State must also require "corrective action” when it discovers a failure to comply with valid and binding…”
Wilkins v. Perales, 128 Misc. 2d 265 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1985). “Concomitant with this the Commissioner of DSS is authorized to promulgate rules and regulations for the administration of all public assistance programs (Social Services Law § 34 [3] [f ]). The Commissioner has also been given the responsibility for the inspection and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.