New York Consolidated Laws

N.Y. Social Services Law § 34 (2026)

General powers and duties of the commissioner

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NY-LEGnysenate.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 34. General powers and duties of the commissioner. 1. The
commissioner of social services shall be the chief administrative
officer of the department.
  2. All the administrative and executive powers and duties of the
department shall be vested in the commissioner.
  3. The commissioner shall
  (a) continue to have, exercise, and perform the functions, powers and
duties conferred by law upon the commissioner of social services;
  (b) execute and issue the determinations, decisions, orders, notices,
licenses and certificates of the department as may be required in the
exercise and performance of the functions, powers and duties conferred
upon or vested in the department;
  (c) take cognizance of the interests of health and welfare of the
inhabitants of the state who lack or are threatened with the deprivation
of the necessaries of life and of all matters pertaining thereto;
  (d) exercise general supervision over the work of all local welfare
authorities;
  (e) enforce this chapter and the regulations of the department within
the state and in the local governmental units;
  (f) establish regulations for administration of public assistance and
care within the state both by the state itself and by the local
governmental units, in accordance with law;
  (g) provide technical assistance, advisory and consultative services
to business, industry and labor to encourage their sponsorship of day
care centers;
  (h) in consultation with the department of education, the department
of health, the division for youth, the office for people with
developmental disabilities and the office of mental health, establish
guidelines for the acceptance by social services officials of notices
that children in foster care are at risk of educational placements, as
provided for in subparagraph four of paragraph b of subdivision one of
section forty-four hundred two of the education law. Such guidelines
shall be designed to assure that the social services district receiving
such a notice inquire into the educational needs of the child and the
circumstances of the foster care placement, and to assure that the
social services district responds as appropriate to any request by a
committee on special education to participate in the proceedings of the
committee;
  (i) exercise such other powers and perform such other duties as may be
required by law.
  4. Notwithstanding any inconsistent provision of the civil service
law, the commisioner may, if he finds that the chief executive officer
of any county or city social services department has failed properly to
perform his duties as required by law or rules and regulations of the
department, present charges and specifications thereof to the appointing
officer or authority of such county or city social services district.
Such appointing officer or authority shall, upon receipt of such charges
or specifications give notice thereof to the chief executive officer of
the social services department and shall make inquiry into the merits of
such specifications at a hearing thereon. The commissioner may present
his evidence at such hearing and recommend removal or other appropriate
sanctions. In the event the appointing authority finds the charges and
specifications made by the comissioner are substantiated, the appointing
officer or authority shall forthwith remove such chief executive officer
or apply other sanctions. Any deputy or other employee of any such
officer may also be removed or sanctioned upon the recommendation of the
commissioner, in the same manner. Such removal or other sanction may not
be appealed to a civil service commission, but may be subject to review
pursuant to article seventy-eight of the civil practice law and rules.
The provisions of this section shall not be deemed to preclude the
exercise of the power of removal or sanction by the officer or authority
having the power of appointment.
  5. The commissioner or any official by him authorized so to do
  (a) may conduct any inquiry pertinent or material to the discharge of
the duties imposed upon him by law;
  (b) is empowered to subpoena witnesses, administer oaths, take
testimony and compel the production of such books, papers, records and
documents as may be relevant to any such investigation.
  6. The commissioner may exercise such additional powers and duties as
may be required for the effective administration of the department and
of the state system of public aid and assistance.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1985–2025 · leading case: Matter of Wittlinger v. Wing, 786 N.E.2d 1270 (NY 2003).
Matter of Wittlinger v. Wing, 786 N.E.2d 1270 (NY 2003). “While, in theory, the State could have signaled its disapproval of the City DSS’s delay by withholding funds from the social services district (see Social Services Law § 20 [3] [e]) or removing or disciplining a local commissioner for *433 dereliction of duty (see Social…”
Thomasel v. Perales, 585 N.E.2d 359 (NY 1991). · cites it 2× “In addition, she alleged that the failure of the State DSS to compel the City DSS to pay continued benefits pending her fair hearing violated the duty of the State DSS under State law to supervise and enforce the AFDC program (Social Services Law § 34 [1], [2], [3] [d], [e]).”
Gross v. Perales, 527 N.E.2d 1205 (NY 1988). “From 1981 to 1983, respondent, the New York State Department of Social Services (NYSDSS), audited the City for compliance with the regulations governing the timely termination or reduction of benefits to recipients for the five-year period 1976 to 1980 (see, Social Services Law…”
Matter of Scuderi-Hunter v. Cnty. of Del., 2022 NY Slip Op 01078 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022). “A commissioner is subject to removal or other disciplinary action only for incompetency or misconduct in office following due notice of the charges and a hearing ( see Civil Service Law § 75 [1] [c]; Social Services Law §§ 34 [4]; 116 [2]). The commissioner is "responsible for…”
Goodwin v. Perales, 669 N.E.2d 234 (NY 1996). “Various provisions in the Social Services Law reinforce this by conferring upon DSS the power to establish "rules, regulations and policies to carry out its powers and duties under this chapter” (Social Services Law § 20 [3] [d]) as well as "regulations for [the] administration…”
Chang Il Moon v. New York State Dep't of Soc. Servs., 207 A.D.2d 103 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995). · cites it 3× “It follows, therefore, that the authority to issue subpoenas in this case must be determined solely by reference to the specific grant of subpoena power contained in Social Services Law § 34 (5) (b) (see, Matter of Irwin v Board of Regents, supra).”
Benjamin v. McGowan, 275 A.D.2d 290 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000). “” The HRA did not require the production of evidence by the day care center (Social Services Law § 34 [5] [b]) and did not even consult its own records to determine if it had ever confirmed the payment of benefits to petitioner.”
Lamboy v. Gross, 129 Misc. 2d 564 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1985). “The State agency must "supervise all social services work, as the same may be administered by any local unit of government and the social services officials thereof’ (Social Services Law § 20 [2] [b].”
Tsakonas v. Dowling, 227 A.D.2d 729 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996). “, Matter of Anderson v Bane, supra), petitioner certainly could have requested the ALJ to issue a subpoena pursuant to Social Services Law § 34 (5) (b) and 18 NYCRR 519.”
Mitchell v. Bane, 218 A.D.2d 537 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995). “Respondent has the obligation to supervise the City Agency and the authority "to sanction local districts for failure to comply with State [Department of Social Services] rules ( 42 USC § 602 [a] [3]; Social Services Law § 34 [3] [d]; § 20 [3] [e])” (Matter of Thomasel v…”
Slade v. Koch, 135 Misc. 2d 283 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1987). “Moreover, the Commissioner must "enforce * * * the regulations of the department within the state and in the local governmental units” (Social Services Law § 34 [3] [e]). The State must also require "corrective action” when it discovers a failure to comply with valid and binding…”
Wilkins v. Perales, 128 Misc. 2d 265 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1985). “Concomitant with this the Commissioner of DSS is authorized to promulgate rules and regulations for the administration of all public assistance programs (Social Services Law § 34 [3] [f ]). The Commissioner has also been given the responsibility for the inspection and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.