New York Consolidated Laws
N.Y. Town Law § 155 (2026)
Discipline and charges
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NY-LEGnysenate.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 155. Discipline and charges. Except as otherwise provided by law, a member of such police department shall continue in office unless suspended or dismissed in the manner hereinafter provided. The town board shall have the power and authority to adopt and make rules and regulations for the examination, hearing, investigation and determination of charges, made or preferred against any member or members of such police department. Except as otherwise provided by law, no member or members of such police department shall be fined, reprimanded, removed or dismissed until written charges shall have been examined, heard and investigated in such manner or by such procedure, practice, examination and investigation as the board, by rules and regulations from time to time, may prescribe. Such charges shall not be brought more than sixty days after the time when the facts upon which such charges are based are known to the town board. Any member of such police department at the time of the hearing or trial of such charges shall have the right to a public hearing and trial and to be represented by counsel; no person who shall have preferred such charges or any part of the same shall sit as judge upon such hearing or trial. Witnesses upon the trial of such charges shall testify thereto under oath. No member of such department who shall have been dismissed shall be reinstated unless he shall, within twelve months of his dismissal, file with such board a written application for a rehearing of the charges upon which he was dismissed. Such board shall have the power to rehear such charges and, in its discretion, may reinstate a member of the force after he has filed such written application therefor. Any member of such department found guilty upon charges, after five days' notice and an opportunity to be heard in his defense, of neglect or dereliction in the performance of official duty, or of violation of rules or regulations or disobedience, or of incompetency to perform official duty, or of an act of delinquency seriously affecting his general character or fitness for office, may be punished by the town board having jurisdiction, by reprimand, by forfeiture and withholding of salary or compensation for a specified time not exceeding twenty days, by extra tours or hours of duty during a specified period not exceeding twenty days, by suspension from duty for a specified time not exceeding twenty days and the withholding of salary or compensation during such suspension, or by dismissal from the department. Notwithstanding chapters one hundred four and five hundred twenty-four of the laws of nineteen hundred thirty-six, such board shall have the power to suspend, without pay, pending the trial of charges, any member of such police department in accordance with subdivision three of section seventy-five of the civil service law. If any member of such police department so suspended shall not be convicted of the charges so preferred, he shall be entitled to full pay from the date of suspension. The conviction of a member of such police department by the town board shall be subject to review by the supreme court in the judicial district in which such town is located in the manner provided by article seventy-eight of the civil practice law and rules, provided that the proceeding is commenced within thirty days from the determination of such conviction by the town board.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1986–2022 · leading case: Rounds v. Town of Vestal, 15 A.D.3d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005).
Rounds v. Town of Vestal, 15 A.D.3d 819 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005). “On April 30, 2003, after petitioner commenced a CPLR article 78 proceeding compelling respondent to proceed under Town Law § 155, respondent served petitioner with a statement of “alternative or supplementary” charges pursuant to Town Law § 155, the substance of which was…”
Town of Wallkill v. Civil Serv. Employees Ass'n, 84 A.D.3d 968 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). “The Town of Wallkill asserts that, pursuant to Town Law § 155, it is vested with the authority “to adopt and make rules and regulations for the examination, hearing, investigation and determination of charges, made or preferred against any member or members” of the Town Police…”
Matter of Hunstein v. Town of Southold, 2022 NY Slip Op 02413 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022). “The determination adopted, with modifications, the findings of a hearing officer dated July 17, 2017, made after a hearing pursuant to Town Law § 155 and Civil Service Law § 75, that the petitioner was guilty of incompetence, and terminated the petitioner's employment as a…”
Algarin v. Town of Wallkill, 313 F. Supp. 2d 257 (S.D.N.Y. 2004). “for the physical examination of any or all members of the police department by a duly qualified physician,” Town Law § 154-a; (4) to “adopt and make rules and regulations for the examination, hearing, investigation and determination of charges, made or preferred against any…”
O'Donnell v. Ferguson, 23 A.D.3d 1005 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005). “ntiff appeals from an order that, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint based on the collateral estoppel effect of a prior judgment in a prior CPLR article 78 proceeding commenced by plaintiff (the petitioner therein) to…”
Coscette v. Town of Wallkill, 281 A.D.2d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001). “The appellants opposed, arguing that, pursuant to Town Law § 155, the petitioner could be suspended without pay for the entire period that disciplinary charges were pending.”
O'donnell, John v. Ferguson, Robert, 100 A.D.3d 1534 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012). “seeking, inter alia, reinstatement to his position and, on a prior appeal, we modified the judgment by dismissing the petition in its entirety on the ground that plaintiff “was a ‘special’ police officer appointed pursuant to Town Law § 158 (1) who served at the pleasure of the…”
Town of Wallkill v. Civil Serv. Employees Ass'n, 19 N.Y.3d 1066 (N.Y. 2012). “Town Law § 155, a general law enacted prior to Civil Service Law §§ 75 and 76, commits to the Town “the power and authority to adopt and make rules and regulations for the examination, hearing, investigation and determination of charges, made or preferred against any member or…”
O'Donnell v. Ferguson, 273 A.D.2d 905 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000). “—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the petition in part by reinstating petitioner to the position of part-time police officer in the Town of Evans,…”
Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of City of New York, Inc. v. New York State Pub. Emp. Relations Bd., 848 N.E.2d 448 (N.Y. 2006). “Section 7 of the Rockland County Police Act (L 1936, ch 526), similar in its wording to more general statutes, Town Law § 155 and Village Law § 8-804, provides in part: “The town board shall have the power and authority to adopt and make rules and regulations for the…”
Colao v. Vill. of Ellenville, 223 A.D.2d 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996). “, 97 AD2d 500, 501 [construing Town Law § 155, a statute comparable to Village Law § 8-804]).”
DiBattista v. McDonough, 80 A.D.3d 936 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011). “Petitioner further contends that, as a member of the Town of Rosendale Police Department, he had the right to a pretermination hearing under Town Law § 155, which affords a public hearing before imposition of discipline upon a member.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.