New York Consolidated Laws

N.Y. Workers' Compensation Law § 35 (2026)

Safety net

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NY-LEGnysenate.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
§ 35. Safety net. 1. Return to work. (a) The commissioner of labor
will issue a report to the governor, the speaker of the assembly, the
majority leader of the senate, and the chairs of the labor, ways and
means and finance committees of the assembly and senate on or before
December first, two thousand seven, making recommendations as to how to
assure that workers categorized by the board as permanently partially
disabled return to gainful employment to the greatest extent
practicable. Such commissioner will consider administrative and
legislative remedies, and shall include estimates of cost in the report.
The report shall examine best practices and the laws of other
jurisdictions, as well as any relevant programs authorized by New York
law. The report shall additionally examine return to work practices as
implemented by carriers, the state insurance fund, employers, and the
board. It shall also examine the relationship of vocational
rehabilitation to ultimate return to work.
  (b) The commissioner of labor will be assisted by an advisory council
constituted of six persons appointed by the governor as follows:
  (i) a representative of organized labor appointed upon recommendation
of the New York State American Federation of Labor-Congress of
Industrial Organizations;
  (ii) a representative of the business community appointed upon
recommendation of the Business Council of New York State, Incorporated;
  (iii) one person upon recommendation of the majority leader of the
senate;
  (iv) one person upon recommendation of the speaker of the assembly;
and
  (v) two other persons in the governor's discretion.
  2. Total industrial disability. No provision of this article shall in
any way be read to derogate or impair current or future claimants'
existing rights to apply at any time to obtain the status of total
industrial disability under current case law.
  3. Extreme hardship redetermination. In cases where the loss of
wage-earning capacity is greater than seventy-five percent, a claimant
may request, within the year prior to the scheduled exhaustion of
indemnity benefits under paragraph w of subdivision three of section
fifteen of this article, that the board reclassify the claimant to
permanent total disability or total industrial disability due to factors
reflecting extreme hardship.
  4. Annual safety net reporting. The board, in conjunction with the
commissioner of labor and the superintendent of financial services,
shall track all claimants who have been awarded permanent partial
disability status and report annually on December first, beginning in
two thousand eight, to the governor, the speaker of the assembly, the
majority leader of the senate, and the chairs of the labor, ways and
means and finance committees of the assembly and senate:
  (i) The number of said claimants who have:
  (1) returned to gainful employment;
  (2) been recategorized as being totally industrially disabled;
  (3) remain subject to duration limitations set forth in paragraph w of
subdivision three of section fifteen of this article; and
  (4) not returned to work, and whose indemnity payments have expired.
  (ii) The additional steps the commissioner contemplates are necessary
to minimize the number of workers who have neither returned to work nor
been recategorized from permanent partial disability.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (11 in the last 5 years), 2020–2026 · leading case: Matter of Minichiello v. New York City Dept. of Homeless Servs., 2020 NY Slip Op 06433 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020).
Matter of Minichiello v. New York City Dept. of Homeless Servs., 2020 NY Slip Op 06433 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020). · cites it 8× “Appeal from an amended decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed June 27, 2019, which ruled that the total disability provision in Workers' Compensation Law § 35 (2) does not apply to claimant.”
Matter of Phillips v. Milbrook Distrib. Servs., 2021 NY Slip Op 06402 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021). · cites it 6× “Appeals (1) from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed May 17, 2019, which denied claimant's request for an extreme hardship redetermination pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 35 (3), (2) from a decision of said Board, filed June 4, 2019, which denied…”
Matter of Vicente (Finger Lakes DDSO), 2022 NY Slip Op 05567 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022). · cites it 3× “Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed March 16, 2021, which ruled that claimant met the requirements for extreme hardship reclassification pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 35 (3). In May 2007, claimant was involved in a work-related accident and…”
Matter of Davis v. Hutchings Child. Servs., 2023 NY Slip Op 00906 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023). · cites it 3× “Appeals from two decisions of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed September 16, 2021, which, among other things, denied claimant's requests for an extreme hardship redetermination pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 35 (3). In 2010, claimant was injured in two…”
Matter of Yi Sun v. State Ins. Fund, 2022 NY Slip Op 00226 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022). · cites it 3× “The Board found, among other things, that there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate a change in condition warranting reclassification and that she is not entitled to an extreme hardship redetermination pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 35 (3).”
Matter of Rapaglia v. New York City Tr. Auth., 2020 NY Slip Op 194 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020). “Claimant also argues that he should have been classified as having a total industrial disability, and that the Board erred in finding that this request was premature ( see Workers' Compensation Law § 35 [2]). "[A] claimant who has a permanent partial disability may nonetheless…”
Matter of Martin v. D'Agostino Supermarkets Inc., 2025 NY Slip Op 04059 (N.Y. App. Div. 2025). · cites it 8× “Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed October 10, 2023, which denied claimant's request for an extreme hardship redetermination pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 35 (3). In 2010, claimant sustained injuries at work, and her subsequent claim for…”
Matter of Brown v. Plans Plus Ltd., 2024 NY Slip Op 05006 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024). · cites it 3× “Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed January 11, 2023, which denied claimant's request for an extreme hardship redetermination pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 35 (3). In 2010, claimant was injured in a work-related accident while working as an…”
Matter of Epstein v. Waldbaums, 2025 NY Slip Op 02633 (N.Y. App. Div. 2025). · cites it 3× “Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed October 4, 2023, which, among other things, granted claimant's request for an extreme hardship redetermination pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 35 (3). Claimant, who worked as a meat wrapper for the employer…”
Matter of Jackson v. New York Foundling Hosp., 2026 NY Slip Op 00642 (N.Y. App. Div. 2026). · cites it 3× “Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed October 4, 2023, which, among other things, denied claimant's request for an extreme hardship redetermination pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 35 (3). Claimant, a case planner and social worker for the…”
Matter of Mystkowski v. Monpat Constr. Inc., 2025 NY Slip Op 01843 (N.Y. App. Div. 2025). · cites it 2× “Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed April 28, 2024, which denied claimant's request for an extreme hardship redetermination pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 35 (3). In 2011, claimant, a roofer, injured his back at work and established a claim…”
Matter of Ackerler v. Asplundh, 2025 NY Slip Op 01848 (N.Y. App. Div. 2025). · cites it 2× “Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed November 14, 2023, which denied claimant's request for an extreme hardship redetermination pursuant to Workers' Compensation Law § 35 (3). In 2012, claimant suffered a work-related injury to his back and his claim…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.