Pataky v. Pataky, 602 S.E.2d 360 (N.C. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Pataky v. Pataky, 602 S.E.2d 360 (N.C. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Malone v. Hutchinson-Malone (ncctapp, 2016-04-05)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Malone v. Hutchinson-Malone
N.C. Ct. App. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
A supporting parent may enter into an enforceable agreement to pay more than would be required under the child support guidelines or to pay for *548 a longer period of time than required by North Carolina General Statute § 50-13.4(c) (2), but if the contractual child support amount or duration is less than required by statute, the child support obligee may still recover child support up to the amount and duration required under the statute. 3 See, e.g., Smith v. Smith, 121 N.C.App. 334 , 340, 465 S.E.2d 52 , 56 (1996) ("The law of this State establishes that a parent can assume contractual ob…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DIANA MAE PATAKY
v.
KENNETH PATAKY
No. 571A03.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Oct 7, 2004.
602 S.E.2d 360
2004 N.C. LEXIS 1120
Nix & Cecil, by Lee M. Cecil, for plaintiff-appellant. , Joyce L. Terres for defendant-appellee.
Cited by 17 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

As to the appeal of right based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to an additional issue was improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED; DISCRETIONARY .REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.