NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-358 (2026)

Disposition of property forbidden

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 1 CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The court or judge may, by order, forbid a transfer or other disposition of, or any interference with, the property of the judgment debtor not exempt from execution. (C.C.P., s. 264; 1868-9, c. 95, s. 2; Code, ss. 488 [subsec. 6], 494; Rev., s. 673; C.S., s. 717.)

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1948–2023 · leading case: Songwooyarn Trading Co. v. Sox Eleven, Inc., 723 S.E.2d 569 (N.C. Ct. App. 2012).
Songwooyarn Trading Co. v. Sox Eleven, Inc., 723 S.E.2d 569 (N.C. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 8× “Also, because the trial court’s order prohibiting defendant from transferring, disposing, or removing property in which he had an interest was authorized under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-358 , we affirm the trial court’s 17 February 2011 supplemental order.”
Motor Fin. Co. v. Putnam, 50 S.E.2d 670 (N.C. 1948). “The order uvas entered in a proceeding supplemental to execution against a third person, and was predicated upon sections 1-358 and 1-360 of the General Statutes.”
S & D Land Clearing Ex Rel. Mitchell v. D'Elegance Mgmt. Ltd., 34 F. App'x 885 (4th Cir. 2002). “” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-358 (1999). At the outset, we must address the interaction of Rule 69, which authorizes supplemental proceedings in accordance with the practice of the relevant state, and Rule 65 and related requirements for the entry of injunctive relief by the district…”
Radiance Capital Receivables Twenty One (N.C. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 16× “N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 1-358 , 1-360 (2021). Defendant claims the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to grant this supplemental proceeding prior to any unsuccessful attempt by plaintiff to satisfy the writ of execution in whole or in part.”
Radiance Capital Receivables Twenty One (N.C. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 16× “N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 1-358 , 1-360 (2021). Defendant claims the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to grant this supplemental proceeding prior to any unsuccessful attempt by plaintiff to satisfy the writ of execution in whole or in part.”
Universal Life Ins. Co. v. Lindberg (N.C. Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 16× “§ 1-358. Here, the trial court issued the Injunction under “Rule 65 of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure and the equitable powers of this Court to issue the injunctive equitable relief.”
In Re Se. Eye Ctr. (Ebw Judgment), 2017 NCBC 41 (N.C. Bus. Ct. 2017). · cites it 7× “N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-358 Ex. C.) 14. On May 13, 2014, Ms.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.