All judges of the superior court and judges of the district court authorized to hear in-chambers matters have jurisdiction to grant injunctions and issue restraining orders in all civil actions and proceedings pending in their respective divisions. (1876-7, c. 223, ss. 1, 2; 1879, c. 63, ss. 1, 3; Code, s. 335; Rev., s. 814; C.S., s. 851; 1971, c. 381, s. 12; 1973, c. 66, s. 2.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
3
cases, 1947–1969 · leading case:
Baker v. Varser, 79 S.E.2d 757 (N.C. 1954).
Baker v. Varser, 79 S.E.2d 757 (N.C. 1954).
“It is contended, however, that under the provisions of G.S. 1-493 judges of the Superior Court have jurisdiction to grant injunctions and restraining orders in all civil actions and proceedings.”
Boston v. Freeman, 171 S.E.2d 206 (N.C. Ct. App. 1969).
· cites it 2× “1-485 and G.S. 1-493, judges of the superior court division retain the jurisdiction to grant injunctive relief.”
Massengill v. . Lee, 44 S.E.2d 356 (N.C. 1947).
“Whether the restraining order was properly issued or not, it could not be ignored by plaintiff Massengill.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.