N.C. Gen. Stat. » Chapter 113A
NC General Statutes

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 113A-1 (2026)

Title

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NCLEGncleg.gov (official) JustiaChapter 113A CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This Article shall be known as the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act of 1971. (1971, c. 1203, s. 1; 1991, c. 431, s. 1.)

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases, 1981–2010 · leading case: Goldston v. State, 637 S.E.2d 876 (N.C. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Goldston v. State, 637 S.E.2d 876 (N.C. 2006). · cites it 4× “2d 134, 146-47 (1975) (holding that citizens could bring an action to prevent the construction of a "Cultural Complex" with tax funds appropriated solely for the purpose of building an art museum), superseded on other grounds by statute, North Carolina Environmental Policy Act…”
Dep't of Transp. v. Blue, 556 S.E.2d 609 (N.C. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 4× “Then, on 1 December 1995, NCDOT prepared and published a Final Environmental Impact Statement (“FEIS”), as required by the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (“NCEPA”), G.S. § 113A-1 et seq., approving the selection of “Alternative A.”
Ncatr v. Ncdot, 645 S.E.2d 105 (N.C. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 3× “Petitioners alleged that respondent acted in violation of the North Carolina Environmental Protection Act, N.C.G.S. § 113A-1 et seq. NCDOT moved to dismiss the petition based, inter alia, on North Carolina Civil Procedure Rule 12(b)(1), (2), and (6); the North Carolina…”
North Carolina All. for Transp. Reform, Inc. v. North Carolina Dep't of Transp., 183 N.C. App. 466 (N.C. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 3× “Petitioners alleged that respondent acted in violation of the North Carolina Environmental Protection Act, N.C.G.S. § 113A-1 el seq. NCDOT moved to dismiss the petition based, inter alia, on North Carolina Civil Procedure Rule 12(b)(1), (2), and (6); the North Carolina…”
Mullin v. Skinner, 756 F. Supp. 904 (E.D.N.C. 1990). · cites it 6× “, the North Carolina State Environmental Policy Act (“SEPA”), N.C.Gen.Stat. §§ 113A-1 et seq., and Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966, 49 U.”
Warren Cnty. v. North Carolina, 528 F. Supp. 276 (E.D.N.C. 1981). · cites it 4× “Having satisfied the four requirements of NCAPA, plaintiff has standing to litigate its fourth cause of action.”
North Carolina All. for Transp. Reform, Inc. v. United States Dep't of Transp., 151 F. Supp. 2d 661 (M.D.N.C. 2001). · cites it 2× “and the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (“NCE-PA”), N.C. Gen.Stat. § 113A-1 et seq. On June 21, 1999, the parties filed a joint motion for an order of dismissal.”
Marriott v. Chatham Cnty., 654 S.E.2d 13 (N.C. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “2 was enacted pursuant to authority set forth in the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 113A-1 et. seq. (“SEPA”).”
North Carolina All. for Transp. Reform, Inc. v. United States Dep't of Transp., 713 F. Supp. 2d 491 (M.D.N.C. 2010). · cites it 2× “, and the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (“NCE-PA”), N.C. Gen.Stat. § 113A-1, et seq. Defendants oppose Plaintiffs’ motion and seek summary judgment themselves on the grounds that the alleged omissions do not violate federal law.”
Empire Power Co. v. N.C. Dep't of Env't, Health & Nat. Resources, 436 S.E.2d 594 (N.C. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “Mouberry also determined that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was not required under N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 113A-1 to -10 (1989) prior to the issuance of the final permit.”
Hunt v. North Carolina Dep't of Transp., 299 F. Supp. 2d 529 (E.D.N.C. 2004). · cites it 3× “, the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NCEPA), N.C.G.S. § 113A-1, et seq. and Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966, 49 U.”
In re the Appeal from the Env't Mgmt. Comm'n, 280 S.E.2d 520 (N.C. Ct. App. 1981). “The requirement that State agencies prepare environmental impact statements of proposed projects is contained in the provisions of North Carolina’s Environmental Policy Act, G.S. 113A-1 et seq. An analysis of the question posed in the case sub judice must, therefore, begin with…”
Show all 15 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.