(a) Civil Penalties. -
(1) Any person who violates any of the provisions of this Article or any ordinance, rule, or order adopted or issued pursuant to this Article by the Commission or by a local government, or who initiates or continues a land-disturbing activity for which an erosion and sedimentation control plan is required except in accordance with the terms, conditions, and provisions of an approved plan, is subject to a civil penalty. The maximum civil penalty for a violation is five thousand dollars ($5,000). A civil penalty may be assessed from the date of the violation. Each day of a continuing violation shall constitute a separate violation. When the person has not been assessed any civil penalty under this subsection for any previous violation and that person abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the violation within 180 days from the date of the notice of violation, the maximum cumulative total civil penalty assessed under this subsection for all violations associated with the land-disturbing activity for which the erosion and sedimentation control plan is required is twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000).
(2) The Secretary or a local government that administers an erosion and sedimentation control program approved under G.S. 113A-60 shall determine the amount of the civil penalty and shall notify the person who is assessed the civil penalty of the amount of the penalty, the reason for assessing the penalty, the option available to that person to request a remission of the civil penalty under G.S. 113A-64.2, the date of the deadline for that person to make the remission request regarding this particular penalty, and, when that person has not been assessed any civil penalty under this section for any previous violation, the date of the deadline for that person to abate continuing environmental damage resulting from the violation in order to be subject to the maximum cumulative total civil penalty under subdivision (1) of this subsection. The notice of assessment shall be served by any means authorized under G.S. 1A-1. A notice of assessment by the Secretary shall direct the violator to either pay the assessment or contest the assessment within 30 days by filing a petition for a contested case under Article 3 of Chapter 150B of the General Statutes. If a violator does not pay a civil penalty assessed by the Secretary within 30 days after it is due, the Department shall request the Attorney General to institute a civil action to recover the amount of the assessment. A notice of assessment by a local government shall direct the violator to either pay the assessment or contest the assessment within 30 days by filing a petition for hearing with the local government as directed by procedures within the local ordinances or regulations adopted to establish and enforce the erosion and sedimentation control program. If a violator does not pay a civil penalty assessed by a local government within 30 days after it is due, the local government may institute a civil action to recover the amount of the assessment. The civil action may be brought in the superior court of any county where the violation occurred or the violator's residence or principal place of business is located. A civil action must be filed within three years of the date the assessment was due. An assessment that is not contested is due when the violator is served with a notice of assessment. An assessment that is contested is due at the conclusion of the administrative and judicial review of the assessment.
(3) In determining the amount of the penalty, the Secretary or a local government shall consider the degree and extent of harm caused by the violation, the cost of rectifying the damage, the amount of money the violator saved by noncompliance, whether the violation was committed willfully and the prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with this Article, or any ordinance, rule, or order adopted or issued pursuant to this Article by the Commission or by a local government.
(4) Repealed by Session Laws 1993 (Reg. Sess., 1994), c. 776, s. 11.
(5) The clear proceeds of civil penalties collected by the Department or other State agency or a local government under this subsection shall be remitted to the Civil Penalty and Forfeiture Fund in accordance with G.S. 115C-457.2.
(b) Criminal Penalties. - Any person who knowingly or willfully violates any provision of this Article or any ordinance, rule, regulation, or order duly adopted or issued by the Commission or a local government, or who knowingly or willfully initiates or continues a land-disturbing activity for which an erosion and sedimentation control plan is required, except in accordance with the terms, conditions, and provisions of an approved plan, shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor that may include a fine not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5,000). (1973, c. 392, s. 15; 1977, c. 852; 1987, c. 246, s. 3; 1987 (Reg. Sess., 1988), c. 1000, s. 5; 1989, c. 676, s. 6; 1991, c. 412, s. 2; c. 725, s. 5; 1993, c. 539, s. 873; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14(c); 1993 (Reg. Sess., 1994), c. 776, s. 11; 1998-215, s. 52; 1999-379, s. 4; 2002-165, s. 2.12; 2013-413, s. 33; 2015-241, s. 14.26(b).)
Notes of Decisions
In Re the Appeal From the Civil Penalty, 379 S.E.2d 30 (N.C. 1989).
· cites it 41× “The trial court concluded that although the assessment was “not ef *376 fected [sic] by error of law,” the authority conferred pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 113A-64 allowed the Secretary of NRCD to assess civil penalties in his “absolute discretion,” and thus the statute constituted a…”
State ex rel. Cobey v. Cook, 453 S.E.2d 553 (N.C. Ct. App. 1995).
· cites it 22× “The verified complaint alleges that on or about 24 August 1992, DEHNR, pursuant to its authority under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 113A-64, assessed civil penalties totalling $5,040.”
Walker v. North Carolina Coastal Resources Comm'n, 476 S.E.2d 138 (N.C. Ct. App. 1996).
· cites it 3× “2d at 277 (citation omitted) (assessment of civil penalty pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 113A-64(a) of Pollution and Sedimentation Control Act not an “action or proceeding” under N.”
McHugh v. North Carolina Dep't of Env't, Health & Nat. Resources, 485 S.E.2d 861 (N.C. Ct. App. 1997).
· cites it 2× “Therefore, substantial evidence existed in the record to find petitioner violated BMPs while conducting logging operations on his property. Petitioner next argues the agency erred as a matter of law in assessing the amount of the civil penalties.”
Allied Env't v. Dept. of Env., 653 S.E.2d 11 (N.C. Ct. App. 2007).
· cites it 2× “§ 1-54(2) does not apply to administrative assessment of civil penalties pursuant to N.C. Gen.Stat. § 113A-64(a) because the statute of limitations applies only to an "action or proceeding" in the general court of justice), noted in the majority opinion, the definition of…”
Walker v. Nc Coastal Resources Com'n, 476 S.E.2d 138 (N.C. Ct. App. 1996).
· cites it 3× “2d at 277 (citation omitted)(assessment of civil penalty pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 113A-64(a) of Pollution and Sedimentation Control Act not an "action or proceeding" under N.”
State ex rel. Lee v. Williams, 284 S.E.2d 572 (N.C. Ct. App. 1981).
· cites it 2× “Pursuant to G.S. 113A-64(a)(2), the Secretary referred the matter to the Attorney General for institution of a civil action to recover the civil penalty and compel compliance with the Act.”
State Ex Rel. Grimsley v. Buchanan, 307 S.E.2d 385 (N.C. Ct. App. 1983).
“Pursuant to G.S. 113A-64(a)(2), plaintiff referred the matter to the Attorney General for institution of a civil action to recover the penalty and compel compliance with the Act.”
— N.C. Gen. Stat. § 113A-64(a) — 8 cases
In Re the Appeal From the Civil Penalty, 379 S.E.2d 30 (N.C. 1989).
“The trial court concluded that although the assessment was “not ef *376 fected [sic] by error of law,” the authority conferred pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 113A-64 allowed the Secretary of NRCD to assess civil penalties in his “absolute discretion,” and thus the statute constituted a…”
Walker v. North Carolina Coastal Resources Comm'n, 476 S.E.2d 138 (N.C. Ct. App. 1996).
“2d at 277 (citation omitted) (assessment of civil penalty pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 113A-64(a) of Pollution and Sedimentation Control Act not an “action or proceeding” under N.”
McHugh v. North Carolina Dep't of Env't, Health & Nat. Resources, 485 S.E.2d 861 (N.C. Ct. App. 1997).
“Therefore, substantial evidence existed in the record to find petitioner violated BMPs while conducting logging operations on his property. Petitioner next argues the agency erred as a matter of law in assessing the amount of the civil penalties.”
State ex rel. Cobey v. Cook, 453 S.E.2d 553 (N.C. Ct. App. 1995).
“The verified complaint alleges that on or about 24 August 1992, DEHNR, pursuant to its authority under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 113A-64, assessed civil penalties totalling $5,040.”
— N.C. Gen. Stat. § 113A-64(a)(1) — 2 cases
In Re the Appeal From the Civil Penalty, 379 S.E.2d 30 (N.C. 1989).
“The trial court concluded that although the assessment was “not ef *376 fected [sic] by error of law,” the authority conferred pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 113A-64 allowed the Secretary of NRCD to assess civil penalties in his “absolute discretion,” and thus the statute constituted a…”
— N.C. Gen. Stat. § 113A-64(a)(2) — 5 cases
State ex rel. Cobey v. Cook, 453 S.E.2d 553 (N.C. Ct. App. 1995).
“The verified complaint alleges that on or about 24 August 1992, DEHNR, pursuant to its authority under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 113A-64, assessed civil penalties totalling $5,040.”
State ex rel. Lee v. Williams, 284 S.E.2d 572 (N.C. Ct. App. 1981).
“Pursuant to G.S. 113A-64(a)(2), the Secretary referred the matter to the Attorney General for institution of a civil action to recover the civil penalty and compel compliance with the Act.”
State Ex Rel. Grimsley v. Buchanan, 307 S.E.2d 385 (N.C. Ct. App. 1983).
“Pursuant to G.S. 113A-64(a)(2), plaintiff referred the matter to the Attorney General for institution of a civil action to recover the penalty and compel compliance with the Act.”
— N.C. Gen. Stat. § 113A-64(a)(3) — 1 case
In Re the Appeal From the Civil Penalty, 379 S.E.2d 30 (N.C. 1989).
“The trial court concluded that although the assessment was “not ef *376 fected [sic] by error of law,” the authority conferred pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 113A-64 allowed the Secretary of NRCD to assess civil penalties in his “absolute discretion,” and thus the statute constituted a…”
— N.C. Gen. Stat. § 113A-64(a)(5) — 1 case
— N.C. Gen. Stat. § 113A-64(a)(l) — 5 cases
State ex rel. Cobey v. Cook, 453 S.E.2d 553 (N.C. Ct. App. 1995).
“The verified complaint alleges that on or about 24 August 1992, DEHNR, pursuant to its authority under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 113A-64, assessed civil penalties totalling $5,040.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.